Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the story is like this my r33 gts-t s-2 orignaly had a problem of mis fireing at 5000 rpm i gapped the plugs down and eliminated the problem. irecently baught a single stage boost controller and upped the boost to approx 10 psi the orignal problem is back with slight stammering at 5000rpm onwards if i gapp the plugs in more will this solve the problem or is this a cause of the fuel thining out to much and need to decrese the boost

i need some constructive imput guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50463-uppped-boost-problems/
Share on other sites

if youve now got your plugs at a smaller gap my only conclusion is that you are hitting boost cut. this leaves you with a few options

1. buy a fuel cut defender

2. buy and aftermarket ecu

3. put the thing on a dyno and find out whats wrong and then go from there

if youve now got your plugs at a smaller gap my only conclusion is that you are hitting boost cut. this leaves you with a few options

1. buy a fuel cut defender

2. buy and aftermarket ecu

3. put the thing on a dyno and find out whats wrong and then go from there

:werd:

Definitely the boost cut. Piggy back ECU is probably the best option.

PLUGS!! at these pressures (8-13 psi), everything should still be able to cope well!!

Mine is stock, accept for what I've posted on avatar.

Mine went to over 12psi for 3 months with no issues. Now back to 10.5psi and safer.

My point is those bloody spark plug gaps should never be taken for granted!!!

Mine had to go down to .7mm before those embarrassing 'shudders and spits' left the building. Been going for 3 months at that .7 setting now, ...still ace. (Miss my boost control though!!) PLUGS!!!

Sounds like its overfueling when you increase boost which is a typical problem. Get a cheap SAFC and that will fix it all and give you some nice extra power.

:werd:

I have read "it's probably boost cut" about 1,000,000 times, but have never read 1 case where that WAS the problem....

I once tuned my boost controller too far and got boost cut, or my AFM maxing out.. whatever you wanna call it, but it was off the guage (over 1.5 bar! (> 21 psi) How much over, I have no idea b/c that's all my guage goes up to)

If a SAFC doesn't fix the problem, (it will definately make it much better), then you have faulty and/or cracked coils.

If the coils are cracked, but not faulty (which it sounds to be the case, otherwise it would run like a dog constantly), then it's an easy fix, just get the cracks plastic welded.

Once your coils are sorted and your A/F ratio's are sorted, then you could re-gap them to 0.8mm (bigger gap, bigger spark / smaller gap, stronger spark - but there has to be a tradeoff)

I got a SAFC and it cured my problem....

then it came back....

So I taped my coils up as described in another thread, but the tape shrunk, and the cracks appeared again....

SO

I used a soldering iron to melt some plastic over the cracks in my coils and it runs soooo smooth now.... I don't know how long it will last, but I'm guessing not that long as melting plastic like that does not fuse the 2 together properly. Plastic welding the cracks would be a much better alternative.

Good luck sorting it all out. The scenarios I have listed are the most common causes of these symptoms as discovered by people when they sorted it out. Boost cut is the most common answer you will get from keyboard tuners.

Zahos

Zahos, I think the terms "boost cut" and "over boost protection" are being confused. You are right. The term is not "boost cut", its "over boost protection". Also, how could users of this, or any other performance forum be anything but "keyboard tuners"?

My car had the same problem. Anything over about 10psi would cause misfire around 5000rpm. It was previously worse (miss @ stock psi) before the plugs were regapped to 0.8. I got a hold of a chipped ECU and this solved the problem. Now I'm running 13psi without any dramas.

Where on your coil packs did you find the cracks? were they easy to spot?

crack

:werd:

 

 I have read "it's probably boost cut" about 1,000,000 times, but have never read 1 case where that WAS the problem....

I once tuned my boost controller too far and got boost cut, or my AFM maxing out.. whatever you wanna call it, but it was off the guage (over 1.5 bar! (> 21 psi) How much over, I have no idea b/c that's all my guage goes up to)

 

 If a SAFC doesn't fix the problem, (it will definately make it much better), then you have faulty and/or cracked coils.

If the coils are cracked, but not faulty (which it sounds to be the case, otherwise it would run like a dog constantly), then it's an easy fix, just get the cracks plastic welded.

 

Once your coils are sorted and your A/F ratio's are sorted, then you could re-gap them to 0.8mm (bigger gap, bigger spark / smaller gap, stronger spark - but there has to be a tradeoff)

 

 I got a SAFC and it cured my problem....

 then it came back....

 So I taped my coils up as described in another thread, but the tape shrunk, and the cracks appeared again....

 

 SO

 

I used a soldering iron to melt some plastic over the cracks in my coils and it runs soooo smooth now.... I don't know how long it will last, but I'm guessing not that long as melting plastic like that does not fuse the 2 together properly. Plastic welding the cracks would be a much better alternative.

 

Good luck sorting it all out. The scenarios I have listed are the most common causes of these symptoms as discovered by people when they sorted it out. Boost cut is the most common answer you will get from keyboard tuners.

 

 Zahos

meh! where can i get a chipped ecu? also how much is a chipped ecu? would u be better off getting a SAFC anyway?

Not really worth getting the stock ECU chipped. You could get a PFC for a little bit more now. I got mine 2nd hand for $150 :rofl: An AFC would be your best bet.

Where on your coil packs did you find the cracks? were they easy to spot?

 crack

Check this picture out. It shows where they crack.

On 4 of my coil packs, i had to hold them a certain angle in the sunlight to see the crack b/c it was so thin. On most of the ones I bought, I could see it quite easily.

I would be getting all 6 plastic welded, even the ones that aren't cracked. They crack because of fatigue in the plastic. A cracked cover on a coil does not mean that the coil has anything else wrong... it usually still functions, but poorly.

The ones that aren't cracked are almost certain to do so, whether it be in the near or distant future....

Zahos

Hi XR8eater, "Over boost protection" is what it is know as, but it is really "excessive airflow protection". The ecu makes this decision based on what the AFM is telling it. So boost really has nothing to do with it. The fix is an SAFC, voltage clamp, Boost Cut Defeater or better still replace the std ecu with a Power FC. Full fuel cut is the next step in engine protection programming in the ECU, but you get "retard" and "rich" first.

Here is a post I prepared earlier that may help

.................................................. .................................................. ...

Hi guys, a quick, simplistic explanation of how an SAFC works might help...

As the airflow into the engine increase, the AFM records this as increased voltage that the ECU sees. What an SAFC does is sit in between the AFM and the ECU and take the voltages from the AFM and either increase or decrease them depending on what you have programmed the SAFC to do. By increasing the voltage, this tricks the ecu into pumping in more fuel, you do this when the engine is running lean. By decreasing the voltage, this tricks the ecu into pumping in less fuel, you do this when the engine is running rich.

The next bit is hard to understand unless you remember that the standard ecu does not supply fuel in direct proportion to the afm voltage ie; 4 volts is not twice as much fuel as 2 volts. Engine rpm, boost and throttle position also help the ecu determine how much fuel to add.

It has been my experience that RB25's run a little lean down low in the rpm range (Nissan do this for fuel economy and emissions) and a lot rich up high (Nissan do this to protect the engine). So I have to increase the voltage (using the SAFC) up to around 3,000 rpm and decrease the voltage over 5,000 rpm.

The real problem is in the 3,000 to 5,000 rpm range as the engine comes on boost. They really need lots of fuel very quickly in this area. This can mean that you need to increase the voltage (that the ecu sees) over 5.1 volts to get the right A/F ratios. The ecu then goes into engine protection mode, rich and retarded (sounds like a girl I knew once). Past that rpm you can start leaning it out as it runs too rich, so the voltage needs to be turned down under 5.1 volts. The ecu sees this as the engine not needing protection mode any more, no more rich and retarded.

So you get good performance up to 3,000 rpm, then sluggish from 3,000 rpm to 5,000 rpm and then good performance from 5,000 rpm and over. The SAFC may not help this, in fact as explained above, it can in fact make it worse if the tuner is not switched on to this stuff.

With bent afm voltages, the ecu (tricked by the SAFC) also fires the ignition to suite the airflow it THINKS the engine is getting. This is not a good thing as you generally end up with ignition that is too far advanced in some rpm ranges.

The poor tuner has to juggle the SAFC settings, so that the A/F ratios are OK, the ecu doesn't get into rich and retard (engine protection) mode and the ignition timing is not too far advanced so as to cause detonation. My experience (I am not a good tuner) has been that this is full of compromises, sometimes you just can't win and have to reduce the boost level a bit to get even a reasonable compromise.

Keep in mind that this explanation is very simplified to make it fit in a reasonable space, the rpm's used are rough guides only and every car is different.

Hope it helps (and makes some sense). :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...