Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey DRIFFT.

This may seem like a stupid question but if I were to install an SAFCII into my car along with a bigger intercooler would I be able to change the settings to the same as yours? Save having it tuned professionally. All our mods would be the same. Kinda works in theory doesn't it?

My view everything is down to the tuner so always get it professionaly tuned on a Dyno that has a good reference, I have seen one customer turn up and blow his motor up because they leaned it out and said tuff shit.

I would say I had the car standard for compliance and then put everything back on, Pod, Intercooler, Exhaust and Boost controler, then had the SAFC tuned which was the inportant part.

The Blitz boost controler is say $1,000 and you always want something else.

A friend brought in a R33 and put an exhaust and pod on it and thought what next, he went out and had a Wolf fitted for $2,000 drive in and drive out and got 250 hp at the wheels. He figured by the time I bought the boost controler, SAFC, fuel cut and speed cut and tuned it all it would cost the same as the Wolf and he was more than happy.

My car was 8 pounds at 180 hp but from 211 to 231 it was the same boost just a bit of tuning, if we spent a bit more time i know we would of got more but I was happy as I mainly wanted fuel economy and over 200 hp.

  • 6 months later...

Thought I'd better add my graph to the collection.

100% stock except on 'high-boost' mode all the time.

This run was performed in 2nd gear, snow mode & with the centre-diff synchroniser active.

The second run (blue) was after we'd advanced the timing a touch (~2deg).

  • 1 month later...

I noticed some people had there dyno's done in 2nd gear. Is there much difference doing the dyno in 2nd or 3rd gear? When they did mine I know they where having trouble as it keep on changing back to second when they were doing the dyno but after a few goes they got it to stay in 3rd.

If thats standerd then my mods are not making much difference, I've never had it tuned before and need to put those Jcar kits in before I get it tuned to get the fuel/air ratio right and boost right.

;)

post-17478-1123022666.gif

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi to all you Stagea drivers,

Finally got my car back (well, getting it tonight) after a week in the dyno shop. Had the 80000km service but needed to replace the timing belt and associated parts, etc. Damn!

Anyway, would like to find out if my power figure is good for the work thats been done to the 1997 Series 1 Dayz edition Stagea auto rb25det.....

had 120kw at 4 wheels with 3inch cat-back Dayz(?) mild steel exhaust and K&N pod filter in custom enclosure, at about 9psi with a turbosmart boost controller.

Installed new Oxygen sensor, R34GTT intercooler, 3inch stainless steel single dump pipe, 3inch small body cat converter, Hybrid electronic boost controller, and a Apexi SAFC. After dyno tune the car has just over 142kw at the 4 wheels.

Is that a decent figure?

Also, what next? Hiflow the current standard turbo or install a Neo turbo (hiflowed?) How much more 4wkw would this give me?

Cheers all, Brendan :(

Pretty much Ive had exactly a 19% increase in power, for an overall outlay of around $1300 on parts plus labour...

Hey SydneyKid, your'e definately an expert in the field of Stageas, is that a decent increase in power for the modifications made to the car?

Also, what would you recommend in terms of the turbo.... hiflow it or upgrade to what??? (the Stagea is driven 3x per week, and is the family car as such).

Thanks,

Brendan Wilkeson

Hi to all you Stagea drivers,

Finally got my car back (well, getting it tonight) after a week in the dyno shop. Had the 80000km service but needed to replace the timing belt and associated parts, etc. Damn!

Anyway, would like to find out if my power figure is good for the work thats been done to the 1997 Series 1 Dayz edition Stagea auto rb25det.....

had 120kw at 4 wheels with 3inch cat-back Dayz(?) mild steel exhaust and K&N pod filter in custom enclosure, at about 9psi with a turbosmart boost controller.

Installed new Oxygen sensor, R34GTT intercooler, 3inch stainless steel single dump pipe, 3inch small body cat converter, Hybrid electronic boost controller, and a Apexi SAFC. After dyno tune the car has just over 142kw at the 4 wheels.

Is that a decent figure?

Also, what next? Hiflow the current standard turbo or install a Neo turbo (hiflowed?) How much more 4wkw would this give me?

Cheers all, Brendan :(

That's a pretty good result, ours ended up at 133 rwkw with just the DFA (11 to 1 A/F ratios) and the IEBC (10 psi), zero mechanical mods. Do you have the dyno graphs for boost and A/F ratio? That's the best way to judge a tune.

Next step, I would go for a split dump, with BOS or CES being the best value for money. Personally I am going to use a GCG ball bearing hi flow turbo, keeping in mind my power target of 200 4wkw. So that turbo will do it easily at around 1 bar, or maybe even less.

Why 200 4wkw? Well I don't really want to change the injectors, or the fuel pump and I figure the auto will handle that power output without killing it. Plus it isn't a race car, it TOWS the race car, so it has to be reliable. Plus I don't want to spend all of my time (and money) modifying it beyond it use. Past experience with RB25's tells me 200 4wkw with an auto (about 215 rwkw with a manual) is a nice reliable and tractible power output.

:D cheers :D

Thanks heaps for the info SK, your feedbak is highly appreiated, cheers straight back to you!! :lol:

I'll edit my post and put in the dyno graph I have, just got to scan it one day at work. See if I can do it this week....

The AFR starts off at just over 13.0 and then dips under 12.0 at 3750rpm, and corrects back up to 12.0 from 4370rpm onwards. The dyno was done in second gear, but from the graphs I have I cant tell the boost. It should be 10psi, as I asked the dual stage ebc to run 7psi for low setting (wife) :( and 10psi for high setting (me). :D

Max power is actually stated as 141.3kw at 110kmph, and max torque is 629.8 NM at 50kmph

Reasonably happy with that, not happy that the damn timing belt and idler needed to be replaced = $500 I didnt budget for!

Bought a single stainless 3inch dump pipe for $225 off ebay from Just Jap, as I wasnt prepard to spend $495 for the Bos Imports split dump pipe - maybe next year when I do more mods I'll upgrade then whilst working on the turbo.....

At the end of the day I reckon around 180kw at the 4 wheels is just fine for this car, so want to find that extra 4wheel 40kw.

Also, a query, the service report states that the air flow meter & the standard injectors are all nearing maximum output - does this sound normal? (doesnt to me!!). What air flow meter and injectors would you recommend replacing them with (when I do turbo work next year)?

Again, your feedback is greatly appreicated, cheers to you. And thank you....

Brendan :D

Thanks heaps for the info SK, your feedbak is highly appreiated, cheers straight back to you!! :lol:

I'll edit my post and put in the dyno graph I have, just got to scan it one day at work. See if I can do it this week....

The AFR starts off at just over 13.0 and then dips under 12.0 at 3750rpm, and corrects back up to 12.0 from 4370rpm onwards. The dyno was done in second gear, but from the graphs I have I cant tell the boost. It should be 10psi, as I asked the dual stage ebc to run 7psi for low setting (wife)  :P  and 10psi for high setting (me).  :D

Max power is actually stated as 141.3kw at 110kmph, and max torque is 629.8 NM at 50kmph

Reasonably happy with that, not happy that the damn timing belt and idler needed to be replaced = $500 I didnt budget for!

Bought a single stainless 3inch dump pipe for $225 off ebay from Just Jap, as I wasnt prepard to spend $495 for the Bos Imports split dump pipe - maybe next year when I do more mods I'll upgrade then whilst working on the turbo.....

At the end of the day I reckon around 180kw at the 4 wheels is just fine for this car, so want to find that extra 4wheel 40kw.

Also, a query, the service report states that the air flow meter & the standard injectors are all nearing maximum output - does this sound normal? (doesnt to me!!). What air flow meter and injectors would you recommend replacing them with (when I do turbo work next year)?

Again, your feedback is greatly appreicated, cheers to you. And thank you....

Brendan :(

Hi Brendan, relying on past experience with RB25's (about 20 of them), the AFM is OK for ~220 rwkw before it starts to max out the voltage too early in the rpm range for the ECU to handle. So I don't think the standard AFM is going to be a problem.

The standard injectors are 370cc's, in a 6 cylinder that's around 370 bhp (276 kw). Our Stagea lost around 70 kw (170 kw = 100 4wkw) on our 4wd dyno, so the injectors are going to be close to running out at 200 4wkw. If they are not quite there, I will simply stick a Nismo adjustable fuel pressure regulator on it ($150) and raise the rail pressure by a few psi (standard is 36-38 psi). I would like 200 4wkw (it starts with a "2"), but if it ends up at 190 4wkw, then that will have to do. I am not changing the injectors, it simply isn't worth it for a handfull of kw's.

:) cheers :)

Hi SK,

Cheers staright back to you.!! Thanks for your info.

I cant upload my dyno graph, tried 3 times today and it just aint working. Oh well, I'll try again later.

Talked to the workshop today, they said the AFM was running 4.95 volts, with just over 5 volts being max, and said if I want that extra 40kw when I do more mods in a years time then a Z32 AFM is needed (oh, and your reputation preceeds you, the fellas at Graham West Workshop read your posts!!).

Also, they said the injectors are currently at 76%, so there is room to move and they 'might' be all ok to get that power figure, but warned me against running them at 100%. Obviously.

They also said the GTT intercooler was running near max with the standard ecu, but said if I did an aftermarket ecu it should be all ok, although they didnt reckon 200kw at the 4wheels is possible with the R34 'cooler.

If I find a cheap afm off ebay I'll grab one, but injectors on ebay seem quiet expensive, around $500+ odd dollars for a used set of 550cc items.

Anyway, regards to you and everyone else,

Brendan ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...