Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

Today i got my car re dyno tuned after running BP Ultimate into it for 3 weeks. The car was previously tuned on Optimax and made 218 rwkw @12psi which was still pretty impressive.

Here is the Original Thread http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=50725

The cars performance mods are as followed:

r33 GTS25T 95' Series 1.5

T3/T4 HighFlow VL Turbo

GTR Front Mount Intercooler

GTR Fuel Pump

Apexi S-AFCII

GReddy Profec B Boost Controller

3" Exhaust Turbo Back

HighFlow Cat

MegaFlow Muffler Twin 2" Tip

K & N Pod Filter

Irodium Spark Plugs

Blitz Open-Atmosphere BOV

Brass Button Clutch

Locked Diff

9.5" Wide Rear Works Rims

BP Ultimate 98 Octane Fuel

Stock RB25DET engine.

Stock Headgasket, Injectors, Cams etc.

Here are the new results :cheers:

dyno_7.10.04.jpg

I was extremely impressed with these results with the fuel being leaned out even more in this tune. A 12 rwkw gain from simply a different fuel & leaner tune.

Boost maxed out @ 12psi as you can see & was down to 10psi @ 230 rwkw due to the boost controller & internal wastegate.

The next step will be Power FC & some injectors, up the boost to say 18psi - 20psi & i should then be up for some for some f*** off power :P heheh

Cheers,

It was 29

The Optimax Dyno sheet is here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=50725

Yep, that makes sense.

Optimax, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 29 degrees

Ultimate, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 56 degrees

genor80r what does pulse do for u or is this first reading u have ever had - dont get me wrong that is a top power figure even if it was , just wanna know more about pulse and where u been with your skyer , to be so proud-newcastle

:thumbsup:mobil senergy8000 fuel nothing but guys-tested and proven

Be very carefull with 12 to 1 a/f ratios. If you get a dirty injector or your full pump starts to ware you could lean out to far. 12 to 1 does not allow any room for a buffer. I have mine just under 12 to 1...

Correct me if I am wrong guys, if so then I am back to the dyno to lean out...

You betcha.  Read mods @ start of thread, SAFCII is the piggy back ECU.

Here's the other Dyno graph too.

dyno_7.10.04_afr.jpg

Yep, that makes sense.  

Optimax, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 29 degrees

Ultimate, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 56 degrees

LOL well that just proves that there really ISENT a difference between the fuels.

Next comparision?

LOL well that just proves that there really ISENT a difference between the fuels.

Well with Optimax the car couldnt be tuned any more than 218 rwkw with 12psi due to pinging, the tune was maxed out for 12psi. The new tune with the better fuel allowed for a leaner tune which resulted in 230 rwkw. The temperate was hotter on 230rwkw yet still putting out more power with a leaner tune. If the IT was even cooler *ie, was 29* i cant see why i wouldnt get an even larger rwkw. Please correct me if i am wrong.

Cheers,

No, if the IT on the 230 run was set at 29 like the other run you would have got a lower power reading. Shootout compensates for differences in ambient temperatures, so if on the 230 run the IT was chaged to 76 degrees you would have got a higher reading than 230 coz its compensating for the apparent higher intake temperature, coz the hotter the air the less dense it is and the less power you will make in the real world

Ok fair enoughs INSTANT. The difference in IT temperature was 29 degree's, to how much rwkw difference that would make i dont know, but i might talk to the tuner today & see what he says.

This IT business is a learning experience for me, now you say the higher IT temp will give a higher rwkw on the dyno spit out.

Now just so i have this right, lets say the AT was 25 & the IT was 150 degrees & the car was making 200 rwkw on dyno rollers. The dyno then makes the final readout for rwkw much higher than 200 rwkw because 150 degrees is very hot & a cooler temperate would give more power rwkw. To what temperature does the computer work out it to be to get the final Max power reading? I'd love to know how this all works exactly.

This is a PM from Sydneykid to me.

Hi, the A/F ratios are great, good results from the SAFC and the tuner obviously knows his stuff.

The temperature comment refers to the differences in the inlet temperature when the ambient temperature is the same. Maybe you should ask the tuner, it may be something simple like the Optimax run was done with the bonnet open and the Ultimate run was done with the bonnet closed. Or maybe he had the dyno fan in a slightly different position.

What I am trying to do is to get the guys on the forum to really analyse the results. ALL of the information on a dyno printout is important and you must look at ALL of it so you get a valid comparison. You can not simply look at the power result and say wow that's better.

Hope that help

Cheers,

Ok fair enoughs INSTANT. The difference in IT temperature was 29 degree's, to how much rwkw difference that would make i dont know, but i might talk to the tuner today & see what he says.

This IT business is a learning experience for me, now you say the higher IT temp will give a higher rwkw on the dyno spit out.  

Now just so i have this right, lets say the AT was 25 & the IT was 150 degrees & the car was making 200 rwkw on dyno rollers.  The dyno then makes the final readout for rwkw much higher than 200 rwkw because 150 degrees is very hot & a cooler temperate would give more power rwkw.  To what temperature does the computer work out it to be to get the final Max power reading?  I'd love to know how this all works exactly.

This is a PM from Sydneykid to me.

Cheers,

Look at it this way, if the tuner did some work on ur car and wanted to show you how much power you have gained from his work, when i reality he didnt do didly squat, he can place the temp probe for the IT on the exhaust manifold and do the dyno run. So the actual intake air going into the engine could be 30 degrees but since the IT probe is reading 150 degrees the computer will give you a higher reading to compensate for the apparent higher intake temp it thinks there is.

Shootout is meant to used so that you can compare the power a car makes in the desert to another car in antartica, but its very easy to bs results 2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...