Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On a bit of a whim, I ran my car at a dyno day using a rolling road dyno (a Torque Performance one) to see how it went. All my other runs had been on a Dynapack hub dyno, but had been curious as to how the two would compare etc. The results were relatively interesting.

The only things that have changed is that when the hub dyno run happened, it was peaking at 11.3psi and it was dropping boost quite badly in the high revs - the rolling road run was peaking at 10.5psi.

During the first run on the rolling road, the rears lit up so I had to do another run with someone sitting in the boot to try and keep it stable - but the power curve looks quite different to the hub dyno curve. Could it have been been scuffing on the rollers? Tuning way out? Or just the way a different dyno reacts?

Hub dyno run:

LithDyno.jpg

And rolling road run is attached.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53208-dyno-inconsistancies/
Share on other sites

Sorry the quality of the scanning is not good enough for me to read the data.:rolleyes:

Are you talking about the rolling road dyno plot? That one for some reason seems to autoscale to the size of the window and comes out looking real crap - happens when I view it anyway. Try and maximize the window?!

And yeah - the peak power drop isn't what bothers me... its known the rolling roads can read 10-15% less at times than a hub dyno, its the shape of the curve which caught my attention.

The main bit that caught my attention was between 90 and 110kph there is a "bump" which I didn't really see the same in the hub dyno plot, maybe its just me not being used to the different scale the plots are shown on :|

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah that is not actually a lot. Just painting my GTR frontend and the little bits to make sideskirts/nismo flare pieces work correctly/fit on the sedan/mount up correctly came to about $7000. Is it a lot? Sure. None of this is economical. Economy would be shelling the car and buying a 2010 Corolla to commute in. The perspective of all of this is different.
    • I have the 2025 build re003s’ on my 06 XT Forester Turbo and I quite rate them for street wet and dry
    • I don't see any issues here. I've been saying all along this is a big job, the price reflects that.  When the car comes back perfect I'm sure it will feel like money well spent. 
    • Remember, take original quote. Double it. Then add a bit more. It's how any project goes.
    • So, I started this repair and got as far as "fixing" the holes with some fibreglass. God all those years working on boats came back quickly. I decided I'd reach out to some rust guys just to see what they would say about it. I came across a guy about 40 mins away and went to see him. He said the windscreen needs to come out, that there might be some more bits around the windscreen and he'd quote them at the time. But his quote was $300 to remove and replace windscreen and $3k for the damage he can see. He said he could respray the roof for $1200 and the bonnet for another $800 (somebody has previously rattle canned it, its horrendous). This is $5300 + any small additional bits. It's a lot, I get that and the name of one of my fave youtube channels 'Not Economically Viable' comes to mind.  I'm not being financially rational, but I've taken him up on the quote. He's opening a new shop in November with more room, so we're waiting for that. I'll leave the currently missing headliner out until then. I'm looking forward to it being fixed and having the paint looking nice again (lots of clear coat issues on the roof too). / flame suit on.
×
×
  • Create New...