Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK guys after a bit of searching around I've found that when converting an auto to manual...you can retain the auto ECU as it has no issues running without the auto trans attached.

The only thing to note is a slightly different fuel curve, timing advance at lower rpm..and the annoying side effect that it can hold high revs for about 5 secs when stopping (auto choke)

Looking at the ECU schematics, it has a communication port built in that TX and RX with the computer on the transmission.

Does this mean an ECU from a manual car would still run in the auto...as the transmission ECU is still receiving the data from the port on the ECU. The only difference being the lack of timing adjustment and fuelling differences?

I'm trying to organise a manual ECU to put in an auto car for the final test...but if anyone out there has actually tried this I'd be interested to hear.

Basically what I'm getting at is...I can't for the life of me get an ECU from an auto R34...but a manual one is available :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53453-the-manual-auto-ecu-mythis-it-true/
Share on other sites

Does this mean an ECU from a manual car would still run in the auto...as the transmission ECU is still receiving the data from the port on the ECU. The only difference being the lack of timing adjustment and fuelling differences?

It will run the engine OK, but the manual ECU has no programming for retarding the ignition on gearchanges. So you will get jerky shifts, flaring on gearchanges and premature gearbox wear.

I drove a manual with an auto ecu last week. It's actually quite a funny sensation. The auto ecu retards the ignition when it thinks there is a gearchange, but in the manual there wasn't a gear change. So the power would drop off everytime the ecu thought there was going to be a gearchange. Really weird feeling, after a while you find yourself trying to match the manual gearchanges with when the ecu thinks they should be.

:P

It will run the engine OK, but the manual ECU has no programming for retarding the ignition on gearchanges. So you will get jerky shifts, flaring on gearchanges and premature gearbox wear.

So nothing I'm worried about then :P I was looking at getting a shift kit and from what I've heard that'll give jerky shifts anyway and should cover the wear issue too.

I drove a manual with an auto ecu last week.  It's actually quite a funny sensation.  The auto ecu retards the ignition when it thinks there is a gearchange, but in the manual there wasn't a gear change.  So the power would drop off everytime the ecu thought there was going to be a gearchange.  Really weird feeling, after a while you find yourself trying to match the manual gearchanges with when the ecu thinks they should be.

:D

My R34 runs an auto ECU (out of a Stagea) but is a manual and I have not noticed this. :confused:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...