Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I got my car dynoed on friday and got 176.8kW on a DD in shootout mode.

Personally, I think that's pretty good considering my car is dead stock except for exhaust although I know dyno readings can be misleading.

Anyway, I just wanted to compare with others out there with a similarly stock car.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53774-got-my-r33-dynoed-comparisons/
Share on other sites

Hmm it does seem high, but it was in shootout mode, and on a fairly warm day.

The reason I don't doubt the integrity is because it was done purely for diagnosis of a problem rather than the installation of any performance bits so theres no reason for them make it read higher.

The other thing could be unknown mods to my car, but it looks stock as in the engine bay and interior...

That is a little high for just an exhaust.

I just got my dead stock 4door r33 tested on the dyno and it produced 135kw at the treads (which is normal 4 an r33 gtst)

If you don't see any mods in your engine bay it could be possible you have a retuned ecu such as.. Mines etc.

wow... those figures seem too good for those mods. would you know if other cars on that dyno also getting high results??

Well it was at TM autosports at Tuggerah which has done dynos of FLYBYE and also that orange autostyle 200ZR (i think it was that one, with 441rwkw). Also, my brothers car ran about the same as me and he has a worked 308...

Well I have just dynoed my R32 GTR on a DD Dyno and got 188kw @ wheels at 14psi 6000rpm. [/u] Mods for power include: Steel turbine and larger comp wheel (mild upgade) on GTR turboes, Tomei cams 260/260 and a trust intercooler. Forget all the support systems for now blah blah blah :P

I was in shootout 6 mode with atmo compensation "on" and correctly setup (thank you dick smith weather station)

At this level of mods my air flow meters are reading 5.1V at 6000rpm and I have major boost creep due to the turbine side and/or waste gate being to small. Boost although set at 14psi creeps up to 18psi by 6000rpm so I don't rev it any further than that.

I continually find it amazing, as I was the dyno operator on my own car, how people seem to get 200+ kw on near standard turboes and seem to suffer non of the above problems?>? The engine is in good condition with no air leaks and has good support systems in place.

Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I found a supplier for an arm in NZ. https://thrashgaragenz.com/products/nissan-skyline-v35-z33-350z-front-lower-straight-arm-rh-side?srsltid=AfmBOopMdfCFDc_8yVZZ9kq5nIngPHRTBzUU8v4SAptJaRO52Wjs0bC6 I looked closely at the photo of that one and the Z1 arm, and it's the same bloody arm. Scratches all match in the photo 😂 How hard is it to change that joint? Also they seem to be listing two options https://thrashgaragenz.com/products/nissan-skyline-v35-z33-350z-front-lower-straight-arm-balljoint-rh-side?_pos=1&_sid=229acde44&_ss=r And now I have no idea what size I'd need yay
    • Ill review it again, from memory when I first saw some of Trailer Park Boys I wasn't a huge fan. I ended up at Letter Kenny after watching Shoresy, which is a bit ass backward, ha ha
    • "lol dunno" either But like you, I can't see any reason they would need to be different LHD to RHD
    • I agree with you WRT the hard top. MX5's may be one of the better looking soft tops but I cannot think of ANY car, EVER that looks better with a soft top vs a hard top (or a designed roof). At all, ever. I also feel this way about the C5 Vette, the Z06 looks horrible compared to it's original form, it has an exaggerated version of the differences you're talking about.  
    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
×
×
  • Create New...