Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to see if my afr's are still ok.  The higher lines are with more boost added.  Is that 12.7:1 too lean for that RPM...i believe that spike is around the 4500-5000rpm mark.

Car runs great.

It's an RB20DET.

Regards,

Scott

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear). I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy. So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm. Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear).  I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy.  So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm.  Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

So you're saying that the lean spike is at 4000rpm? OK then... (the dyno was done in 3rd as you can tell).

Cameron,

A bit of background info: I have a remapped Toshi (guy off the forums) std ECU and was last remapped for 1 bar. Then i have had it back on the dyno and boost turned up to 1.3 bar.

What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?

It's a bit confusing to me.

Cheers,

Scott

The dyno printout was all done with the same ECU.

I just added more boost.

Red line = 1.0 bar

Blue line = 1.3 bar

Green line = 1.4 bar

I thought it would have been making more topend power at higher boost. A few months ago i had the car on the same dyno and made 194 rwkw at around 1 bar i believe, but did not match the midrange of my latest dyno (pic) with the 1.3 & 1.4 bar runs (20 rwkw less through midrange but about the same up top).

It's an R32 GTS-T w/ GT2530, FMIC, 3 inch full exhaust, pod filter, and remapped ECU. Everything else standard.

Let me know what you think.

Cheers,

Scott

Sh!te thats very good power for a RB20 i'd be happy with it,

The more boost you run the more air is being forced into the enigne which means more exhaust gasses. The HKS 2530 turbo is good for about 250kw's maby more on a RB25. so maby your top end power you are refering too maby somthing else not the turbo.

The mid range power has increased and some with the top end aswel. mid range is about 25kw's more and top end is about 15kw's more - Which is good.

Are you still running standard fuel pump and injectors ? - They'll need upgrading soon aswel.

Your leaning out spike(little one) isn't too much of a worrie as were it goes up you dont have much speed and rpm up their. For daily driving on hot days dont thrash it on too high of a boost level but at night when its cold high boost (1.4bar) should be fine.

Other than that its a nice smooth power curve.

:D

Jun

"What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?"

Anyone???

And Cameron, i've got upgraded pump but still standard injectors.

Scott

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
    • Thanks @jtha7 I will have a look around tomorrow but it is a prick of a spot. These are some photos i tried taking 
    • I take it that the knock retard is from bearings tapping a little tune? Thicker oil is a fragile bandaid. You need a much bigger oil cooler and probably the bigger pump being discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...