Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Merli,

I spoke to some big name tuners before purchasing my MicroTech, Tilbrooks for the FC and RPM for the Mtech, and thru all the questions i asked them about both computers, tuning resolution was never mentioned.

I dont know why it didnt come up, but it would seem that if the microtech was at a 'significant' disadvantage over the FC in this area, i would have been told this by Tilbrooks'??

You said it doesnt matter whether WE can tell the difference in load points, but surely it does! Say the tuner prefers an FC, but the end result is the same, and WE the drivers cant tell the difference, then why spend extra money on load points you wont even notice? I like the point whatsisname made about the stereo with the functions you never use and probably dont need- very good analogy!

I dont think your particular analogy is that accurate - 8V pre outs vs 1V pre outs. In this case i think its more a case of 45Wx4 vs 50Wx4!! that works out 1 or 2 Watts RMS. You wont be able to tell the difference. :)

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

GiJO,

Cheers for posting that table!

Getting back to resolution, The table actually shows:

Microtech 500rpm Vs "480"rpm for the FC

20rpm difference, not the 100rpm difference first indicated by someone. Cmon guys, that is insignificant on a tuff streeter!!

I dont know why they use a MAP sensor!? Motec are really the kings, and they use MAP dont they?!

The MAP gives you a bit more freedom with your blow off valve, as there is no sensitive AFM to confuse... But hey, if micro tech offered an AFM option it would be great for those concerned about fuel consumption.

Someone with a LT12 please do a decent test!! as i wont be driving my car for a while! (its in Adelaide, im in Sydney at the moment)

SLY

Originally posted by Merli

Biggest reason:

LT12 = 16x16 Map = 256 Tuning/Load Points

PFC = 20x20 Map = 400 Tuning/Load Points.

That's nearly twice the tuning resolution.

'nuff said.

You don't need to program all 256 load points to get a good street tune let alone 400.

7 year old Haltech's had 512 load points, temp compensation and 250rpm incrementals if you wanted.

There are a number of excellent computer options around to increase the fueling requirements of the modified streeter. Piggy backs to full replacement it's all a case of potato / tomato.

At the end of the day the computer you end up getting will only be as good as the tune its given. On that topic the easier the interface is to understand the less time is taken to interpret and fewer mistakes are made (murphys law still applies).

Originally posted by SLY33

that dosnt sound good! but I wouldnt take that as the norm.  We had a 33 in adelaide that made 230kw at the wheels with standard turbo and just an FC and std mods, wheras most will be around the high 190's, low 200's.

-apparently that was the most power ever obtained from any 33 with the std turbo? (in adelaide at least!)

WTF???

u sayin stock non highflowed turbo, stock afm, no fuel pressure reg etc?

sly33... the power fc is 400rpm... i just checked the magazine. It must have stuffed up on the scan so it looks like 480rpm. I'll do some checking around as well. I'm in Melbourne, anyone know some good places to get PowerFC or Microtech tuned? i'd like to go have a chat to them.

Thanks

Andrew

I think the reason you will get a slight decrease in economy with the Microtech is because it dosent run closed loop, this will mean you use more fuel when you are just crusing. Other than that there is nothing bad about them that I have heard.

I spoke to some big name tuners before purchasing my MicroTech, Tilbrooks for the FC and RPM for the Mtech, and thru all the questions i asked them about both computers, tuning resolution was never mentioned.

 I dont know why it didnt come up, but it would seem that if the microtech was at a 'significant' disadvantage over the FC in this area, i would have been told this by Tilbrooks'??

Perhaps you didn't ask the right questions?

Perhaps Tillbrooks makes a larger profit selling the Microtech? (Very VERY possible)

Perhaps Tillbrooks prefers to work with Microtech?

There could be a lot of reasons.

You said it doesnt matter whether WE can tell the difference in load points, but surely it does!  Say the tuner prefers an FC, but the end result is the same, and WE the drivers cant tell the difference, then why spend extra money on load points you wont even notice?  

You seem to have completely missed my point. The main reason for having a greater number of load points is to give higher tuning resolution. Who does the tuning? Your tuner.

You may very well not notice the smoother power delivery from more accurate fuel and ignition maps... In which case, I suggest you get the cheapest ECU you can find.

For those of you who want to give your tuner the best possible tool to work with when tuning your expensive engine, I suggest buying the best ECU available. It's not rocket science to realise that giving your tuner an A4 peice of paper to work with is better than giving him an A5 peice of paper to work with.

I like the point whatsisname made about the stereo with the functions you never use and probably dont need- very good analogy!

Actually it's a very bad analogy, because a higher resolution tuning map is in use 100% of the time... It's not a function you can just "never use", like a whizz-bang stereo function.

I dont think your particular analogy is that accurate - 8V pre outs vs 1V pre outs.  In this case i think its more a case of 45Wx4 vs 50Wx4!!  that works out 1 or 2 Watts RMS.  You wont be able to tell the difference. :)

Whatever... If you don't think you'll be able to tell the difference between a $1500 Nakamichi deck, and a $300 Sansui deck, then I suggest you buy the Sansui deck.

If you *CAN* tell the difference, then the decision is already made for you.

In any case... For those arguing the effectiveness of a 20x20 map vs. 16x16 map, you have already got your mind made up that the LT12 is your solution. Fine. But know that your argument on the 256 load points being just as good as 400 load points is actually quite laughable. Seriously.

How much better is it? I'm not sure.

Is it worth the extra money? I'm not sure.

But is it better? Absolutely, without a doubt. Simple maths.

It seems to me that on a road car the two most important features are having closed loop, and also a proper airflow meter.

MAP sensors assume that the airflow through the engine is a certain amount at a certain manifold vacuum or pressure. If something changes anywhere in the engine or exhaust system, the whole thing needs to be retuned.

An airflow meter actually measures the airflow, and adds the correct amount of fuel. If something changes the airflow, then the fuel mixture remains correct.

If like me you are constantly messing about with your car an airflow meter is far more forgiving. Closed loop control at light throttle is also very good for the same reason.

In my opinion having a MAP sensor and no closed loop on an everyday road car is silly, and is going to cost heaps in poor fuel economy and performance.

Originally posted by Merli

In any case... For those arguing the effectiveness of a 20x20 map vs. 16x16 map, you have already got your mind made up that the LT12 is your solution. Fine. But know that your argument on the 256 load points being just as good as 400 load points is actually quite laughable. Seriously.

How much better is it? I'm not sure.

Is it worth the extra money? I'm not sure.

But is it better? Absolutely, without a doubt. Simple maths.

Does this mean that the Wolf V4 with 2048 load points is far superior than almost any other ecu out there??

Originally posted by Merli

Whatever... If you don't think you'll be able to tell the difference between a $1500 Nakamichi deck, and a $300 Sansui deck, then I suggest you buy the Sansui deck.  

If you *CAN* tell the difference, then the decision is already made for you.

Dude, thats taking it a bit far- thats like comparing a mandarin to an orange. Its more like a small orange (Mtech) to a slightly larger and sweeter orange that costs a bit more (FC).

If you want an orange, you will enjoy them both :)

(btw, i just ate an orange, hence my analogy. And it was a bit smaller than I usually buy ;))

Originally posted by Merli

In any case... For those arguing the effectiveness of a 20x20 map vs. 16x16 map, you have already got your mind made up that the LT12 is your solution. Fine. But know that your argument on the 256 load points being just as good as 400 load points is actually quite laughable. Seriously.

How much better is it? I'm not sure.

Is it worth the extra money? I'm not sure.

But is it better? Absolutely, without a doubt. Simple maths.  

Well im not arguing about map specifics or maths, you obviously know more than your avg consumer, including myself, about that department. Im just relaying my first hand experiences to help others make a decision on which road they'd take. I could've really used this thread when i was ECU shopping!

Originally posted by Merli

Perhaps Tillbrooks makes a larger profit selling the Microtech? (Very VERY possible)  

Perhaps Tillbrooks prefers to work with Microtech?

Just for the record, Tilbrooks push the FC. I dont think they even sell MicroTech. Even so they can obviously play with it well enough to pump out extra kw's such as in Matts 33!

-Merli, just out of curiosity, what ECU are you using? -and lets not turn this into the afforementioned ECU war!

Cheers, SLY

Originally posted by rev210

You don't need to program all 256 load points to get a good street tune let alone 400.

7 year old Haltech's had 512 load points, temp compensation and 250rpm incrementals if you wanted.

There are a number of excellent computer options around to increase the fueling requirements of the modified streeter. Piggy backs to full replacement it's all a case of potato / tomato.  

At the end of the day the computer you end up getting will only be as good as the tune its given. On that topic the easier the interface is to understand the less time is taken to interpret and fewer mistakes are made (murphys law still applies).

Interesting about the older ECU's. And yeah, the tuner thing too.

Originally posted by INASNT

WTF???  

u sayin stock non highflowed turbo, stock afm, no fuel pressure reg etc?

Yep. Stock turbo. Im not sure about the stock AFM or fuel pressure reg, but im pretty sure about 230rwkw. He had cooler, exhaust, intake, cam gears, basically all the available bolt on's and a good tune. Yes, the car was a freak.

Well wasnt there a 33 at the recent tilbrooks dyno day that did 204rwkw on a stock ecu and basic mods?

I wish i had the other details about the 230rwkw car, but i know his name was Leon, a big asian guy. Anyone from adelaide know him?? This power was made some time ago too. Think it might have been sold, i will see what else i can dig up.

SLY

Originally posted by SLY33

Dude, thats taking it a bit far- thats like comparing a mandarin to an orange. Its more like a small orange (Mtech) to a slightly larger and sweeter orange that costs a bit more (FC).  

Just for the record, Tilbrooks push the FC.  I dont think they even sell MicroTech.  Even so they can obviously play with it well enough to pump out extra kw's such as in Matts 33!

-Merli, just out of curiosity, what ECU are you using?  -and lets not turn this into the afforementioned ECU war!

Yeah, I did take the analogy too far, but that's the beauty of analogies :P:)

The thing is, when Matt says he make 250rwkw, that's just peak power... Although that's an excellent figure, it doesn't tell you what his power delivery is like, what his half throttle performance is like, what his throttle response is like, etc...

After saying that, I saw the dyno chart Meggala posted up for him, and in all honesty, it looks like an excellently tuned car, with excellent power delivery... No rough bumps...

I'm running an HKS GT3040, and making 275.8rwkw @ 1.1 bar(can't get a higher reading because my OS Giken twin plate clutch is slipping now ;) More money down the drain to get new clutch plates)... The HKS GT3040 doesn't come into it's efficiency range until 1.6-1.9 bar, so the turbo isn't even breathing hard yet... I just have to put forged internals in there, and turn up the boost... Oh... and find a spare $5000 first ;)

To make that, I'm using a PowerFC, but to be honest I need to find something else. The Z32 AFM I'm using is not going to cope with the turbo flowing 2.0 bar worth of air(which is what I'm going to run it at after the internals get done), so I need an ECU that can use a MAP sensor, and get rid of my AFM...

Maybe I'll start a thread and see what suggestions people can come up with ;)

Originally posted by Merli

I'm running an HKS GT3040, and making 275.8rwkw @ 1.1 bar(can't get a higher reading because my OS Giken twin plate clutch is slipping now :) More money down the drain to get new clutch plates)... The HKS GT3040 doesn't come into it's efficiency range until 1.6-1.9 bar, so the turbo isn't even breathing hard yet... I just have to put forged internals in there, and turn up the boost... Oh... and find a spare $5000 first ;)

To make that, I'm using a PowerFC, but to be honest I need to find something else. The Z32 AFM I'm using is not going to cope with the turbo flowing 2.0 bar worth of air(which is what I'm going to run it at after the internals get done), so I need an ECU that can use a MAP sensor, and get rid of my AFM...

Dude, that sounds like a crazy ride! you had it down the quarter?

Sounds like awesome stuff... What compression ratio are you gonna use when you pump up the boost?

What boost can be safely run with a std RB25 (forgetting the ceramic turb wheel on std turbos) I know that a simple head gasket change can drop comp down to 8.5:1, allowing more boost, but i dont like the idea of losing off boost drivability, a factor that made the 33 a more attractive buy to me than the 32.

Will 8.5:1 comp ratio on RB25 make it drive like an RB20 off boost? I'll post this one as a new thread.

SLY

Originally posted by Merli

 The thing is, when Matt says he make 250rwkw, that's just peak power... Although that's an excellent figure, it doesn't tell you what his power delivery is like, what his half throttle performance is like, what his throttle response is like, etc...  

After saying that, I saw the dyno chart Meggala posted up for him, and in all honesty, it looks like an excellently tuned car, with excellent power delivery... No rough bumps...

Merli,

You're more than welcome to hop on a plane, fly down (stay @ my house if you like, as long as you don't mind a 7wk old baby crying 1/2 the night :)) & drive my car to see how poorly the lowly 256 load points feel in terms of all round driveability. I'm dead serious too! :uh-huh:

As I said in my "257rwkw" thread, driveability is excellent. I wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t! It "was" a little off factory quality but after some further tuning by Mr HPI himself I'm a very happy camper. Tim from RPM did most of the work (on Freebaggin's tune) he then loaded the maps into mine & went from there. Martin finished it off nicely (FOC too!)

As for my analogy, let me try again.... Lets take the most expensive high end home audio (I'm talking' mega quality gear!) It probably has THD, wow & flutter, signal to noise ratio (or whatever the hell they call all that jazz) that's so good it's beyond the ability of the human ear to pick the difference from low spec equipment, sure the top notch gear is great but only your dog will appreciate it ;)

I realise 400 is better than 256 (bigger being better & all that) the question is…..how much better!? Other than a possible slight difference in economy (something I personally don't really care about) would you be able to feel a difference on the road? Or see a difference in dyno numbers?

A very skilfully & carefully tuned ECU "should" have A/FR's that make for best power & economy irrespective of closed loop. Providing there is temp correction I see no reason this won't be the case. That's not to say that CL doesn't make a difference, just it's not as much as people think. Incidentally Microtech will upgrade to include CL soon.

Andrew,

That Zoom article (penned by Martin some time ago) also shows the Microtech range doesn’t have laptop control. It certainly does now. It also 100% does have temperature correction (water/air). These functions allow the ECU to make fine adjustments in relation to air & water temp changes. Thus maintaining a perfect A/FR & idle stability. The air temp function also allows the ECU to control the timing (advancing or retarding) dependent on inlet temp, once again to ensure perfect A/FR’s & maximum safe power.

ECU choice is open to soooo many variables arguing one or the other is pointless.

Budget

Ease of installation

Ease of tuning

Knowledge of local tuners (unless you’re prepared to travel or have someone come to you)

Your set up

Required or desirable features (MAP or AFM, logging, auxiliary outputs i.e. thermo fan control / Nitrous control etc.)

Even contacts in the business!

Ability to revert to standard with ease (such as the PFC)

The list can go on!

By the way Merli, nice set up & rwkw figure!

Originally posted by whatsisname

You're more than welcome to hop on a plane, fly down (stay @ my house if you like, as long as you don't mind a 7wk old baby crying 1/2 the night :)) & drive my car to see how poorly the lowly 256 load points feel in terms of all round driveability. I'm dead serious too! :uh-huh:  

As I said in my  "257rwkw" thread, driveability is excellent. I wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t! It "was" a little off factory quality but after some further tuning by Mr HPI himself I'm a very happy camper. Tim from RPM did most of the work (on Freebaggin's tune) he then loaded the maps into mine & went from there. Martin finished it off nicely (FOC too!)          

As for my analogy, let me try again.... Lets take the most expensive high end home audio (I'm talking' mega quality gear!) It probably has THD, wow & flutter, signal to noise ratio (or whatever the hell they call all that jazz) that's so good it's beyond the ability of the human ear to pick the difference from low spec equipment, sure the top notch gear is great but only your dog will appreciate it ;)  

I realise 400 is better than 256 (bigger being better & all that) the question is…..how much better!?  Other than a possible slight difference in economy (something I personally don't really care about) would you be able to feel a difference on the road?  Or see a difference in dyno numbers?

A very skilfully & carefully tuned ECU "should" have A/FR's that make for best power & economy irrespective of closed loop. Providing there is temp correction I see no reason this won't be the case. That's not to say that CL doesn't make a difference, just it's not as much as people think. Incidentally Microtech will upgrade to include CL soon.

WOOHOO!!!! FIELD TRIP!!! ;)

I'd love to come down to Melbourne and let you take me for a fang in your car... I want to visit a few of the clubs down there too, my friends tell me they go off! :P There was talk of a "meet halfway"-type cruise between NSW/QLD or NSW/VIC a while ago, but no-one has gotten off their asses and organised it... Imagine the collective horsepower between a VIC/NSW meet ;)

Anyway, back to the matter at hand... I agree with you... I don't know how much better 400 load points would be vs. 256 points... I actually had a spare PowerFC lying around up until about 3 weeks ago... This thread should have popped up earlier... I would have been more than happy to send it down to you to play with and do back to back runs with your LT12... I guess that's the only way to see how much of a difference it makes... Same car, same dyno, same day, different ECUs.

ROFL!!! I actually burst out laughing at the dog part ;) I think I woke up my dog doing so... :lol: :lol:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...