Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can anyone point me to some guides on installing adjustable swaybars on a 33?

Couldn't find anything around here or on the whiteline website.

I got quoted $200 to install which I thought was a bit steep and half the price of the bars themself!

Is the rear easier to do than the front? From what I've read I should put it up on ramps (which I have)?

The bushes and 'hooks' that also came with the bars looks nothing like the factory ones.

Is it best to undo the bushes first or the bolts on the lower control arms?

Anyone in Brissie that can help, theres a slab/bottle in it for you?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55040-r33-installing-whiteline-swaybars/
Share on other sites

Stabiliser bars are sooooo easy to install, this is how I do it.

Drive car onto ramps

Chock it, handbrake on, in gear

Unbolt the links. remember where they were bolted

Unbolt the D bush brackets and remove the std bar

Put new D bushes on Whiteline bar, first smear some lubricant on the inside of the D bushes

Fit brackets ove D bushes and lift bar into and bolt up

Fit new links, first smear some lubricant on the inside of the link bushes

Check bolts

Do same for other end. Hope that helps:cheers:

Would these adjustable sway bars reduce body roll significantly on an R33 with standard springs and shocks? I am asking b/c I want to leave my car at the standard height b/c:

a) trying to keep my car looking as stock as possible

B) keep the standard ride height for comfort reasons as it is my daily driver

but I dont like the amount of body roll the R33 has when cornering sometimes.

would I be wasting my money?

thanks

Zahos

Also it's important that you have weight on the wheels as the fronts will foul on the lower wishbone so SK's advice on the ramps is critical. Jacked up it just won't fit.

Zahos, it was good for 5 seconds at Sandown so go ahead. I only had lowered springs.

I've been looking at the handling kit from white line

Comes with the blades, caster kit and rear camber kit for approx $615. do you guys reakon its worth getting all the bits or just the bars?

The codes for the kits are:

R33 gts : knis05h

R32 gts : knis14h

these swaybars in my opinion are worth every cent. i got my front and rear adjust for $320 +66 for installation cause it only took an hr but in highsight would have only cost $30 if i had of done the rears myself. the fronts were just too dificult.

as for performance with stock suss, they significantly reduce body roll. i honestly felt the difference straight away just buy driving out of the workshop when i picked the car up. the car does occasionally skip slightly over bumps but thats because i set the rear to hardest...but thats the way i like it. .....best money ever spent.

Does putting on swaybars generate more grip for the car? or does it just flatten out the corners so you can take them harder?

So if you had a choice for no swaybars but sticky tires or swaybars but not so sticky tires, which would you choose?

I guess with swaybars the car will handle better, but can the same car without the upgraded swaybars go around a corner at the same speed?

Well just about there with the rear bar, but am not sure about 2 things?

1. In the picture there are 2 nuts, which are currently all the way to the bottom, should they be in a certain position on the bolt? As central as possible?

2. There are 2 settings on the bar, which is soft and hard?

Thanks for any help?

hmmmmm...its been a while since i installed them on my 180...

with the bolts......i just did them so they are tight in conjunction with the top nut...

so the bushes are snug and dont move on the lower control arm...

if u know what i mean...just make sure that BOTH sides (of bar) are the same length overall..

where bolts, bushes, nuts are ...needs to be identical...

the stiffness...looks like its on the 'soft' setting....bolt holes - further into bar is stiffer.. so no.1 = stiffer

after installing them...i could definitely feel an improvement...not as much as i thought

though, but i already had damn stiff coil-overs...so if u are running standard shocks etc..

you will be happy...

I just made em central on the bolt and identical on each side.

Just went for a thrash, and it was noticable but not as much as I thought it would be, I'll leave it on soft for a couple of weeks then switch over to hard so I should be able to tell the difference between the two.

also....after installing uprated swaybars, do you usually have to get a wheel alignment?

nah u dont need a wheel alignment.

ideal street settings should be medium at the front and soft at the back i think. ..dont quote me on that though:D when i got mine done i set it to med front and hard back. the first time they installed the back the did it wrong, it was pre-loaded so it was supper stiff and you could really feel it and get the tail end out anytime u wanted to. i now understand the principles of those super thick/stiff dori bars in japan:D got them to reinstall it correctly and i could notice the difference in the rear end, wasnt as tight as before. all comes down to settings and how u like to drive i guess.

Well just about there with the rear bar, but am not sure about 2 things?

1. In the picture there are 2 nuts, which are currently all the way to the bottom, should they be in a certain position on the bolt? As central as possible?

2. There are 2 settings on the bar, which is soft and hard?

Thanks for any help?

Shane, 1. central on the thread or so the bar doesn't foul is good but ensure the pressure on the nolathane is firm as previously mentioned. I would recommend getting Centreline to balance them so there is no preload left or right. If there is any slight twist due to manufacture or installation the bar will preload one wheel slightly and upset the handling a little.

2. the settings are hard toward the bar and soft toward the end. I have mine set at fully soft on the rear and fully hard on the front. You may not notice a significant difference until you get the front on and both set to complement each other in a balanced way.

You have 3 settings with the 2 holes at the rear. Full hard - both toward the bar. Medium - with one each way. Full soft - with both toward the end.

On the front, if you have the 4 hole bar, you can configure similarly for greater control over setup.

These are the scriptures according to Sydneykid, guru of all things suspension.

locosam, the bars will generate more grip due to better contact of all 4 tyres, but not as much as sticky tyres. I have found that the Dunlop DO1J tyres were good foor 5 seconds a lap at PI for me, and maybe more if they were mine and I was willing to push them harder (didn't want to flat spot Roys tyres) but the bars (and a better tune/more power) gave me an improvement of 5 seconds at Sandown where the power and getting it to the ground out of 3 critical turns is more important. I would expect(hope) the combination to be worth greater than the sum of the two and provide 9-10 seconds at PI but am yet to test the theory.

Since you wouldn't drive everyday on semi-comps, do the bars as they are cheaper than the tyres and last forever. The tyres may be destroyed faster at the track by not having the bars.

Hi guys, under Stage Suspension thread, in the Stage section, I have posted a step by step picture guide for fitting front and rear Whiteline Stabiliser bars to a Stagea. The general layout on the Stagea is pretty much the same as on R33GTST, R33GTR, R34GTT and R34GTR. The sizes vary of course.

Hope it is of some help:cheers:

  • Like 1
these swaybars in my opinion are worth every cent. i got my front and rear adjust for $320 +66 for installation cause it only took an hr but in highsight would have only cost $30 if i had of done the rears myself. the fronts were just too dificult.

Hey B1, what does the $320 include?? Just the bars, or the bushes that go along with it too?

I get some squeeky noises from my front end, and it doesn't feel as rigid as it used to, so I suspect I have some worn bushes, only I dont know enough about this matter to determine which ones need replacing. Can any1 suggest what bushes I should be changing (not just from a maintanance point of view, but from a handling point of view)?

Thanks

This is how I did it on the Stagea;

And you get at the nut at the rear (14 mm socket and medium extension), it is a bit hidden up above the radius rod bush;

StdFrontBarSBracketNutcopy.jpg

For some reason code is OFF. Why?

If you can't see the picture, go the the Stagea Suspension thread, it's all there.

;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...