Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Please don't let this turn into a shit fight of what plenum is better. I am purely buying this plenum for simplicity in intercooler piping and to make it easier to get to my spark plugs/coil packs etc. This thread is for discussion of what is needed to be done to install the Greddy plenum.

Cheers fellas

hey gtst89,

i am having no luck with neugun looks like no-group buy from there, Mod You cars' is getting back to me on a price and my other supply is out for the night so i will get incontact with him 2morrow.

Like i said i have a price of $1300 if we get alest 5 people this inc everything shipping,tax, custum etc

Att: SK! I want one because it makes my eyes hurt looking at the standard Rb25 inlet! Honestly its that bad I'm considering switching over to a GTR head because I have a GTR inlet.

If I run the Greddy plenum I will have like a metre less inlet length won't I? My main preference with the car is to have minimal lag. You mentioned using a U-turn right in front of the throttle body. it look kinda rough, what are your experiences with that? What about that fugly throttle body relocation to the front of the plenum?

Hi Guys, I'll keep this brief as there are plenty of threads on this exact subject.

I have tested the standard RB25DET inlet (inc throttle body) and it shows ZERO resistance at airflows equivalent to 450 bhp on the flow bench. Since 450 bhp is my rule of thumb limit for standard internals, my suggestion is always to spend your money on something else (other than a plenum) until you have upgraded the internals. Simply because it is a waste of money, not to mention time.

Don't get me wrong I am not saying that Greddy plenums are crap, although the airflow distribution is not perfect. What I am saying is you will get a better result from spending your $1K plus on other things.

An example, for around the same money I will get a much larger power increase from a set of camshafts. Porting the cylinder head, polishing amnd matching the combustion chambers will give a larger power increase. A better turbo will give a larger power increase. A better intercooler will give a larger power increase. A Power FC will give a larger power increase. A decent exhaust manifold will give a larger power increase. Hi flow cat, cat back exhaust etc etc. There are plenty of better ways to spend your money.

As for response, I have compared the amount of air held in the standard manifold and 120 degree style pipework to a Greddy plenum and its pipework. The difference is less than 1.5 litres. So do the numbers;

2500 cc X 5000 rpm / 2 (4 stroke) = 104 litres per second

So saving 1.5 litres represents 1.4 hundredths of a second

That's not a lot of lag to save with reduced pipework

A set of cams, a port and polish, Power FC, exhaust manifold, will all reduce lag much better than that.

Bottom line, after you upgrade the internals is the time to THINK about upgrading the plenum.

Hope that helps:cheers:

that does make sense actually, we dont all have the deepest pockets so what SK is saying that there are much better 'bang for your buck' upgrades out there...

i wouldnt know what you guys have on your cars and what sorta power levels ure chasing btw

very good points skid.... yeah i was 99.5 percent sure that the subzero plenum was not a full replacement unit i pretty sure some did a flow bench test on the two hmmmz must search the forums

adrian :)

subzero can do the short runner ones too ... I believe they simply cut the standard runners and attach the plenum to it.

I would have to say the topic of plenums is rather opinionated. If you don't want to spend a big amount of cash on your car simply leave this area alone and make do with the mods in other areas. RB25 Aftermarkets plenums have very little power increase for those still running the stock turbos as the stock plenum will out flow the standard turbo. The standard plenum from what i have read starts to run out of breath once you get up around the 350rwhp. The general rule of thumb is for every PSI of boost increase your meant to see approx 7-9 hp (providing all other areas of the engine are efficent, obviously differs from turbo to turbo too.). But once you start to make over this hp mark the power increase as to each PSI of boost pressure added decreases.

Runner length also plays a big part in engine response and behavour. The longer the runner (providing the runner has decent flow properties), the slightly less engine response (read:lag). The shorter the runner the quicker the engine responses. The longer runners however increase capacity of the plenum system so to speak which inturns gives the affect of a much larger plenum that what is actually there which means higher HP support.

In my opinion cast plenums are always much stronger than the sheet metal fabricated ones. While some sheet metal ones can give no problems at all they still have the potential to split and fail. I have heard of a story of a sheet metal fabricated plenum blowing apart while on a dyno and doing damage to a vehicle. This is almost a worse case scenario though. Usually if anything do go wrong the plenum would crack around the welds if at all.

Another issue with aftermarket plenums is the positioning of the bell mouths (if any) and even air distrubition. This has the potentional to cause more problems than its worth. Personally when i see a standard rb25 plenum with the throttle body cut and moved to the front of the plenum i shudder. The standard plenum was not designed to have air enter from this point so air distribution inside plenum would not do ideal and could cause one or a number of cylinders to recieve a vastly different amount of air to others, which in turns causes leaning.

I'm not going to say which plenum I think is best as they all have their good and bad points. I have a Greddy plenum on my R33, it was on there when i bought the car so I'm kind of biased, but that doesn't necessary mean its the best plenum.

ookami, you say longer runners give more lag? I thought the factory runners are long to provide good off boost response and better drivability, i dont think it has a lag issue. Especially since SK has said that the extra length of cooler piping on a standard set up only has 1.5litres of extra air, the extra air a std plenum will hold compared to a Greddy one would be a sparrows fart.

great post SK, i like the idea of doing the plenum to improve the look and convenience of accessing plugs etc, but like you say its sure not worth over a grand just for that! how often do people need to pull plugs?! the factory setup can look very neat when the right parts are detailed.

sorry author this thread is off track.

ookami, you say longer runners give more lag? I thought the factory runners are long to provide good off boost response and better drivability, i dont think it has a lag issue. Especially since SK has said that the extra length of cooler piping on a standard set up only has 1.5litres of extra air, the extra air a std plenum will hold compared to a Greddy one would be a sparrows fart.

great post SK, i like the idea of doing the plenum to improve the look and convenience of accessing plugs etc, but like you say its sure not worth over a grand just for that! how often do people need to pull plugs?!  the factory setup can look very neat when the right parts are detailed.

sorry author this thread is off track.

Be careful, there is a lot of difference between the air before the throttle body (as in the pipework & the intercooler) and the air between the throttle body and the inlet valve.:)

YEah,

"The longer the runner (providing the runner has decent flow properties), the slightly less engine response (read:lag) "

Mmm was of the thinking, longer runner length, purely equated to better cylinder filling at lower engine speeds, ( that 15” column of pressurized air, stored in the runner able to quickly vent into the chamber on inlet valve open ) causing Better response. Course at higher air speeds the longer runner becomes a bottle neck, where the shorter option does not.

Lets maybe not get into the relationship of runner length and harmonics, with positive pulse tuneing.

… I thought

What was the topic again?... sorry gtst89

just check the wiring for your idle controll valve ect. you might have to lengthen them. mine have been lengthened, but a mate fitted one and recons you dont have to.

hi boganrice and i just finnished fitting his Greddy plennum, you do have to lengthen the idle cont valve wiring. my other mate forgot that the vehicle he fitted the plennum to had previously had an aftermarket plennum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...