Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Sydneykid for the late reply, as you asked i have been gathering infomation to back up my claim. From what i understand you work for a race car team, use motec in your race cars and are very knowlagable in you area. I am prepared for your critcism and happy to reply, as you keep the thread positive. unlike like the other dicks here.

The wolf is a better computer because

1. Price, compared to the motec of simliair features the motec would cost over $7000

2. Idle speed control

3. it is a true plug and play

4. from exprience the fuel delivery

5. does not need CDI modules to run the coils properly.

6. the wolf has 2048map points, motec 1048

-----------

RNS11Z, i do have cams in the head, 256 in 264 ex, i will confirm mph on wednesday.

-----------

TIMMMAYYY, (acutual Pimp) give me a break you ****ing retard, i will answer your questions when you are polite enough to answer mine.

----------

ronin6 your opinion is well founded, the wolf has very basic data logging, an apsolute must for racing.

----------

rev210 :D

----------

raist60, smoke the coils, i will keep reading, ???????? no idea im not running at over 90% duty cycle.

----------

dnb i would love to , my car is open for inspection, changing injectors not easy, lots to remove.

---------

IMACUL8, i will talk it up, do you have a motec?, if so talk it up. clown

---------

INASNT yes im a wolf salesman, lol. did that take you long to think up.

---------

R32-GTS :D

--------

INASNT another quality installment, do you think before or after you dribble.

--------

BU5TER calling my self not the best drag racer would be to oposite of arrogant.?

--------

RB20LagWagon cry cry cry, yet again.

--------

my car is for real, sydneykid hope this is enough.

tristan

And what do we all expect to happen when he does, he's never been to the drags before ... hell it took me 6 months to get times that were 1/2 respectable out of a 400+hp car, it is not easy at all in a RWD how about we pressure him less and let him enjoy his car and after a few months of racing we have a look at his mph and judge it then :D

I for one don't want to see a nice skyline end up in the wall

there has been way to much pressure placed on tristan

none of this is his fault

his car makes that power full stop. it hasnt done a time full stop. he wont drive it to a time full stop. those are facts, **** the excuses and the arguing, what happens happens.

its a shame tristan is being used as a pawn by others to create arguments or to show off about how good their products are.

Good luck racing it, mate. Post your progress. I will suggest that the mph will be a better indicator of the cars' hp and potential ET's for the first while until you get a handle on the beast.

Adrian

A close friend of mine is one of the directors(owner) of AEM (advanced engine management) the manufacturer of WOLF ecu's.....I will have to commend him on his work next time i see him :)

Maybe he can hook magic1 up with a part time job :)

Magic good luck at the strip, what tyres and suspension setup will you be running?

raist60, smoke the coils, i will keep reading, ???????? no idea im not running at over 90% duty cycle.

Now I definitely think you aint running 370cc injectors dude. Wow! Less than 90% duty cycle on a 370cc injector (which makes 333cc best case) with 300+ rwkws.

CAWWWW!!!!

Ok so i got bored enough to actually do the maths and this is what i got...

Inj CC/Min Inj lb/hour Hp/Inj BHP

370 35.23809524 70.47619048 422.8571429

550 52.38095238 104.7619048 628.5714286

I got the formulas from http://www.rceng.com/technical.htm

Im no mathemagician just wanna show you what the maths says.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...