Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been all over the shop getting quotes for fitting my intercooler (gtr on gts-t)

The mob ive just talked to said, the gtr cooler will work awesomely, but he wants to mod the plenum and move the throttle body to reduce piping

is this a good idea? the guy said he would use a curved section up to the front of the plenum

i like the sound of reduce piping, but have heard stories about custom plenums being dodgy and not flowing air to all cylinders

whats the go with that?

is there anyway we can test that all cylinders do get a propper air flow with the custom plenum?

is this the best way to install an intercooler?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55371-intercooler-install-modifying-plenum/
Share on other sites

Need a little more information on the "curved section up to the front of the plenum" bit. I know a few guys who have seen good numbers from fabricating a custom can on top of the standard RB25 bottom runners. G-Reddy of course make a plenum, plus a heap of major places here in Oz.

Do they flow evenly to all cylinders? A flow bench is used to check this often when being thought about, but I could imagine a lot of ones wouldn’t ... otherwise I guess the detonation threshold of the lowest common dominator, would be the point where the "limit" is reached.

If you were going to hang onto the car and start making serious power, the custom top half would be a good start for me I reckon!

... but just ma pinion.. =)

Think had about how much pipe length you will save, is it really woth it. There is a pressure loss of about 25 Pa (N/m2) (0.0036 Psi OR 0.00025 Bar) in 1m length of 65mm (2.5inch pipe) really, is it worth all the effort. The maths to work out that pressure loss is at the bottom of the post.

Also,

The factory plenum and inet runners were designed that way for a reason, very close to symmetrical flow with equal length runners, ie equal air flow to all cylinders so fuel trimming is not required.

Personally, I do not like the design of most aftermarket inlet manifolds, sure some flow better but pressure drop between cylinders can be significantly different resulting in different air flow and screwed up fuel trimming (some cylinders running rich, some lean - makes it very hard to tune). If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

My advice, leave the factory manifold unless you want really big power numbers, save the money,

Here is the maths to work that pressure loss;

Air at 60 oC flowing in a 1 m galvanized duct - 65 mm diameter - with velocity 15 m/s. (All guesses at a typical operating condition)

Reynolds number Re = dh v ρ / μ

where

v = velocity

ρ = density

μ = dynamic or absolute viscosity

Re = ( 1 kg/m3 15 m/s 0.065 m ) / 2 x 10-5 Ns/m2 = 48750 (kgm/s2)/N ~ Turbulent flow

Using Moody Diagram - the friction coefficient - λ - is:

λ = 0,015

The major loss - Darcy-Weisbach Equation

hloss = λ ( l / dh ) ( ρ v^2 / 2 )

= 0,015 (1 m / 0,065 m) ( 1 kg/m3 (15 m/s)^2 / 2 )

= 25 Pa (N/m2)

= 0.0036 Psi

= 0.00025 Bar

So with a whole extra meter of intercooler piping you would see 6.9964 Psi instead of 7 Psi at the manifold.

That formula is for a "straight" piece of pipe yeah?

Not taking into account the extra bends involved or the fact your still running over

the top of the motor(heatsoak).

What about how long it takes to fill that extra volume.

Not knocking you just asking a question.

the plenum i have on mine is a custom top half.

i leaned out the a/f ratio on my rb25 and held it flat and finally blew at 260km/hr

interestingly enough the cylinders that went were 3 and 4 not the end ones like everyone thinks

"Just" is right the calc is for straight pipe, I was more just pointing out that there is dick all pressure loss in uniform pipe with that diameter at that velocity. You can work out the minor losses (ie losses from bends, valves (throttle) etc..) with the eqn below.

All just an excuse to use those old uni books.

ploss = ξ 1/2 ρ v^2

where

ξ = minor loss coefficient

ploss = pressure loss (Pa (N/m^2)

ρ = density (kg/m^3)

v = flow velocity (m/s)

hloss = head loss (m)

g = acceleration of gravity (m/s^2)

Typical values of minor loss coefficient

Flanged Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.3

Threaded Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 1.5

Threaded Regular 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.4

Flanged Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

Threaded Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.7

Flanged Long Radius 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

I pulled most of this stuff off http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com - really usefull sight.

If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

Power FC's have individual cylinder trim for the injectors.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
    • Bit of a similar question, apprently with epoxy primer you can just sand the panel to 240 grit then apply it and put body filler on top. So does that basically mean you almost never have to go to bare metal for simple dents?
    • Good to hear. Hopefully you're happy enough not to notice when driving and just enjoy yourself.
    • I mean, most of us just love cars. Doesnt necessarily have to be a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...