Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been all over the shop getting quotes for fitting my intercooler (gtr on gts-t)

The mob ive just talked to said, the gtr cooler will work awesomely, but he wants to mod the plenum and move the throttle body to reduce piping

is this a good idea? the guy said he would use a curved section up to the front of the plenum

i like the sound of reduce piping, but have heard stories about custom plenums being dodgy and not flowing air to all cylinders

whats the go with that?

is there anyway we can test that all cylinders do get a propper air flow with the custom plenum?

is this the best way to install an intercooler?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55371-intercooler-install-modifying-plenum/
Share on other sites

Need a little more information on the "curved section up to the front of the plenum" bit. I know a few guys who have seen good numbers from fabricating a custom can on top of the standard RB25 bottom runners. G-Reddy of course make a plenum, plus a heap of major places here in Oz.

Do they flow evenly to all cylinders? A flow bench is used to check this often when being thought about, but I could imagine a lot of ones wouldn’t ... otherwise I guess the detonation threshold of the lowest common dominator, would be the point where the "limit" is reached.

If you were going to hang onto the car and start making serious power, the custom top half would be a good start for me I reckon!

... but just ma pinion.. =)

Think had about how much pipe length you will save, is it really woth it. There is a pressure loss of about 25 Pa (N/m2) (0.0036 Psi OR 0.00025 Bar) in 1m length of 65mm (2.5inch pipe) really, is it worth all the effort. The maths to work out that pressure loss is at the bottom of the post.

Also,

The factory plenum and inet runners were designed that way for a reason, very close to symmetrical flow with equal length runners, ie equal air flow to all cylinders so fuel trimming is not required.

Personally, I do not like the design of most aftermarket inlet manifolds, sure some flow better but pressure drop between cylinders can be significantly different resulting in different air flow and screwed up fuel trimming (some cylinders running rich, some lean - makes it very hard to tune). If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

My advice, leave the factory manifold unless you want really big power numbers, save the money,

Here is the maths to work that pressure loss;

Air at 60 oC flowing in a 1 m galvanized duct - 65 mm diameter - with velocity 15 m/s. (All guesses at a typical operating condition)

Reynolds number Re = dh v ρ / μ

where

v = velocity

ρ = density

μ = dynamic or absolute viscosity

Re = ( 1 kg/m3 15 m/s 0.065 m ) / 2 x 10-5 Ns/m2 = 48750 (kgm/s2)/N ~ Turbulent flow

Using Moody Diagram - the friction coefficient - λ - is:

λ = 0,015

The major loss - Darcy-Weisbach Equation

hloss = λ ( l / dh ) ( ρ v^2 / 2 )

= 0,015 (1 m / 0,065 m) ( 1 kg/m3 (15 m/s)^2 / 2 )

= 25 Pa (N/m2)

= 0.0036 Psi

= 0.00025 Bar

So with a whole extra meter of intercooler piping you would see 6.9964 Psi instead of 7 Psi at the manifold.

That formula is for a "straight" piece of pipe yeah?

Not taking into account the extra bends involved or the fact your still running over

the top of the motor(heatsoak).

What about how long it takes to fill that extra volume.

Not knocking you just asking a question.

the plenum i have on mine is a custom top half.

i leaned out the a/f ratio on my rb25 and held it flat and finally blew at 260km/hr

interestingly enough the cylinders that went were 3 and 4 not the end ones like everyone thinks

"Just" is right the calc is for straight pipe, I was more just pointing out that there is dick all pressure loss in uniform pipe with that diameter at that velocity. You can work out the minor losses (ie losses from bends, valves (throttle) etc..) with the eqn below.

All just an excuse to use those old uni books.

ploss = ξ 1/2 ρ v^2

where

ξ = minor loss coefficient

ploss = pressure loss (Pa (N/m^2)

ρ = density (kg/m^3)

v = flow velocity (m/s)

hloss = head loss (m)

g = acceleration of gravity (m/s^2)

Typical values of minor loss coefficient

Flanged Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.3

Threaded Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 1.5

Threaded Regular 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.4

Flanged Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

Threaded Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.7

Flanged Long Radius 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

I pulled most of this stuff off http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com - really usefull sight.

If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

Power FC's have individual cylinder trim for the injectors.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...