Jump to content
SAU Community

Power vs torque


Recommended Posts

Guest mightymax

I cannot figure this out maybe some fellow forum members can help me out.... :)

What influences power and torque?

1.)For example running increases stamina/endurance while wieght lifting increases strength for human...

For cars what mods increase power or torque???

OR

2.)Is it dependent on the nature and characteristics of the ECU?e.g.power fc vs possumlink

OR

3.)Can the tuner trade off power and torque?

Foe example:car A: 100kw(power) and 50nm(torque)

car B: 50kw and 100nm(torque)

Which car would have a advantage on a flat surface and a steep slope?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/
Share on other sites

Torque is a twisting force, just the same as you would apply with a spanner to do up a nut.

Fifty foot pounds of torque is like a fifty pound weight on the end of a one foot spanner. Or five pounds of force on the end of a ten foot spanner.

This is simply a force pushing, pulling or twisting on something.

Power is the rate of work being done, or force times speed. If you do something twice as fast, it requires twice the power.

So, power equals torque times speed. expressed Ft-lb x RPM.

A long time ago a guy calld James Watt got himself a genuine hairy horse, and did some measurements to see how much weight his horse could lift or drag in a certain time.

He decided that his horse could lift a 550 pound weight one foot each second, and this has now become the standard unit of horsepower. True !

We now have the formula , Horsepower = Ft-lb x RPM / 5252

Getting back to internal combustion engines, torque is twisting force only. The main factor deciding torque for a non supercharged engine, is the size of the engine, that is the bore, stroke, and number of cylinders.

Power for a heat engine is the rate at which air and fuel can be burnt in a given time. So power has more to do with airflow through the engine than the size of the engine.

I small high reving motorcycle engine can make a lot of power because it can spin so fast, but will not have a lot of torque because it is small.

A huge truck engine will make a lot of torque because it is big. But because it cannot spin fast the power will be relatively low.

A gearbox can reduce the speed of a shaft and increase the torque at the same time, but the power remains almost exactly the same.

So a one hundred horsepower motorcycle engine fed through a reduction gearbox can produce the same torque and RPM as you would get straight from the one hundred horsepower truck engine.

Does that help ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84273
Share on other sites

Okay - easiest way to get more torque is to increase capacity. Now how do you do that on a motor? Increase the boost.

If you want more power, you play with your mixtures, let the motor breathe better, etc etc...

matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84666
Share on other sites

Power=Torque*RPM*a constant

If you make good torque at high RPM you make good power, and can take better advantage of gearing.

My last car was a Civic VTiR, which had bugger all torque, but peak torque was over 6000RPM, leading to peak power of 118kw at 7200rpm.

I am driving a 3L diesel lowlux hire car at the moment, which has heaps of low torque but this drops off well below the 4500 redline:uh-huh: . It can accel up a steep hill in fourth at 1700 rpm, but would do a 0-100 in 15 seconds.

Power is all about where your torque is in the RPM range.

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84709
Share on other sites

Originally posted by b2barker

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Exactly! I'm glad someone pointed this out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-85260
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Warpspeed

Torque = acceleration, power = speed.

You got that around the wrong way. With a lot of power you can gear it down for very quick acceleration, but without the torque your top speed will suffer. So on a simplistic basis, you could say that power=acceleration and torque=top speed. Of course gearing affects this, but that's the basics.

A lot of people talk about fast drag cars which have a lot of torque, but these also have a shitload of power. Take a look at a Mack truck. It has mammoth amounts of torque but not too much power (on a relative scale). They accelerate like slugs but can still get up to well beyond highway speeds. You're not going to run a 9s quarter mile on a normal truck engine no matter what your gearing is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86801
Share on other sites

Well jim your half right.

I still say torque = acceleration. Which gear gives the greatest rate of acceleration, first gear or top gear ? Why ?

Tractive effort is what accelerates the vehicle.

Now if you want to talk about the fastest way to cover a certain distance, that is different thing altogether. What you need is the HIGHEST AVERAGE SPEED to cover a given distance in the shortest possible time.

For this you need high power, because time becomes an important part of the problem. So yes, high power is the most significant factor in getting a low ET, or high terminal speed.

So power = speed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86848
Share on other sites

Warpspeed,

Torque is the only thing acting on your wheels, so you're splitting hairs here. The simple reason why your car accelerates slower in a taller gear is because you are reducing the power to your wheels. Have you ever seen a dyno chart? The torque curve stays fairly flat all the way along, but the power goes up with the speed and eventually tapers off. If what you were saying was true it'd be the other way around.

What I'm saying is if you have a high powered engine with not a lot of torque, you can compensate for a lack of torque with gearing, which will improve your acceleration but won't improve your top speed unless you had a really short ratio, and you lengthen it to the point of finding the engine's torque limits.

Once you're past the threshold of your maximum torque, no amount of gearing will increase your top speed. Even if you're not redlining, eventually there will be a gear ratio that will limit the vehicle's top speed. It is a lack of torque here that's stopping you going any faster, not power. Therefore you could say that the amount of torque governs your top speed.

Your example actually illustrates this. You're talking about a high terminal speed. You're using power to accelerate to this speed, not maintain it. So yes, you need a high powered engine to get to that point as quickly as possible, but the actual speed you can reach is a reflection of your torque.

Even most normal cars have enough power and torque to keep accelerating way beyond the standing quarter mile so it's not a very good example. I have ridden 250cc motorcycles that can accelerate quite quickly to about 130kph, but the top speed is like 150 and the acceleration from 130-150 is much less than from 0-130. When at 150 in top gear, the engine is way below redline but it just won't go any faster even if you drop it back a gear. These bikes have high powered engines (40hp or so) but very little torque, which is why they can't go any faster.

I maintain that I am entirely correct, and even your example proves this. If I'm half correct then that means you're also half correct, which means we're both correct? That doesn't make any sense :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86857
Share on other sites

I have read through what you said a few times, and cannot disagree, I think we are looking at the same problem from a different angle.

For instance you say when you go up a gear the power to the wheels drops because engine RPM drop. Quite true, I had never really thought of it quite like that.

And as you say if the torque curve is (almost) flat, then the torque at the wheels will drop because the reduction ratio through the gearbox is less in the higher gear. It is really saying the same thing but looking at it from a different perspective.

When gearing a competition car for maximum performance it is the power curve that is most important. Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear.

The torque multiplication through the gearbox will be maximum under these conditions in each gear, giving greatest acceleration.

If you only rev it to the engine torque peak at the same road speed, you will be in a much higher gear, and actual acceleration will be less.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86869
Share on other sites

Warp u sumed it up with this statement, I was wondering who would get it right first 10 points.

"Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear. "

totaly true. thats how i geared my car

my car only uses a 1500 rpm rev range

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86944
Share on other sites

Guest (_W.4.S.P._)

this is a great topic ,,

For cars what mods increase power or torque??? c'n'paste

so torque will get increased by a longer stroking engine or by a larger cubic capacity

and

power will increase by getting more revolutions per minute onto the rear wheels ?( motor, g box , diff ? )

umm ,, side Q? ... what stops a cummins turbo deisel from reving to 9000 per min? roller bearing the thing and put it in a gemini and bombs away ????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86968
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...