Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone has information on tests done to determine the flow benifits of various 'hard pipe' upgrades. Cusco ,HKS and others have kits going so perhaps there

I have started to notice that the factory R32 gtr piping is less than perfect. As an example the metal pipe in the guard that connects to the rubber one with the plenum on the otherside. Just inside this metal pipe is the connecting pipe to the BOV's and it has a nice big lip of metal protruding into the airflow. Not to mention the cast metal pipe that joins the two turbo outlets with the "twin turbo" badge on it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57204-gtr-hard-pipe-upgrade-improvements/
Share on other sites

One word.....plugs.

I had a dinner cancellation and I thought " I'll just nick off to the drags, my plugs are a bit sick but surely a few runs will clean them out....."

I ran 3 times and went home. Each time it got worse. The first run was a terrible 13.2 (spark giving out under load above 4500rpm) and the second and third were a joke. The Tomei cams rough idle mixtures pretty much killed the plugs in a few weeks of everyday around town driving.

I ripped the stupid irridium plugs out (the previous owner put them in) last night and put some old NGK coppers in, good as new (for now). The Power FC goes in on thursday and Lumpy is giving it a tune so the mixture issue will be resolved. I'll go down again when I can, knocking a second and a bit off that time will be very easy.

For the $$$ they fetch or the pain they cause to manufacture, I don't see them as a cost effective mod.

Big hp is being had with stock GTR piping, as imperfect as they look. That's another reason I wasn't quite interested in the aftermarket piping.

Would love to see some test results if anyone has done it though.

For the $$$ they fetch or the pain they cause to manufacture, I don't see them as a cost effective mod.

Big hp is being had with stock GTR piping, as imperfect as they look. That's another reason I wasn't quite interested in the aftermarket piping.

Would love to see some test results if anyone has done it though.

People have been mucking around with them for some time. Here's an example with a modification of the 'twin turbo' pipe that yeilds a very good result on track cars worth 20ps on a N1 equiped gtr apparently.

Guest two.06l
Just wondering if anyone has information on tests done to determine the flow benifits of various 'hard pipe' upgrades. Cusco ,HKS and others have kits going so perhaps there  

I have started to notice that the factory R32 gtr piping is less than perfect. As an example the metal pipe in the guard that connects to the rubber one with the plenum on the otherside. Just inside this metal pipe is the connecting pipe to the BOV's and it has a nice big lip of metal protruding into the airflow. Not to mention the cast metal pipe that joins the two turbo outlets with the "twin turbo" badge on it.

it might surprise you but the HKS kit uses the pipe with the "nice big lip of metal".

People have been mucking around with them for some time. Here's an example with a modification of the 'twin turbo' pipe that yeilds a very good result on track cars worth 20ps on a N1 equiped gtr apparently.

you know, rev210, a big single would fix that problem right up :)

it might surprise you but the HKS kit uses the pipe with the "nice big lip of metal".

It doesn't suprise me. What you mean is they don't replace that pipe right? I can't really understand why you would re-make what seems like a mistake in design.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...