Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Provided it does what it says it does, that looks extremely good. It looks like a PDA version of Nissans CONSULT. I'd be curious if the Ign and Inj changes get written back to the ECU, and whether some type of daughterboard is required.

Are you meant to mount that into the dash?

I'm suprised it lists cefiro in there O_o

Considering power FC's etc are the same from R32 to Cefiro there is no reason why this should not be interchangable also.

Looks like a good idea.........bit scary to think people with minimal knowledge can play with there ECU though........confucious say: uninformed people play with management equals many engine failure

The changes to the Ignition and Injection aren't permanent. This would be more a diagnostics tool than a modification tool..

It would run off the consult port..

True it doesnt write the new settings to the ECU, but couldnt the PDA software just remember them and re-apply the settings everytime it starts up?

I emailed them. Here is the reply:

Hello Andrew

Currently we are just at the end of field trials and it all looks good.

We should have a deliverable product by Mid to End of January.

EcuXtend will be released in two packages;

* Full Package which will contain the software, interface unit with

cables and a HP Ipaq rz1710 PDA

* Interface and software ONLY package which will be the same as the full

package minus the PDA.

We anticipate the RRP for the FULL package will be $999 and $599 for the

INTERFACE ONLY package.

Due to issues in obtaining information for PDA's the only PDA's

supported will be the HP IPaq range at this point in time until we

obtain the required information to use other PDS devices.

If you have not already done so, register on the mailing list as all

people who register will be emailed when the product is released. You

can register at http://www.rationalracing.com/signup.asp

If you have any further queries please dont hesitate to contact us.

to which i replied saying sounds good, but for the $1,000 mark i think i'd prefere a PowerFC, but good luck... they replied with:

hi Andrew

we know about the powerfc and don't feel that it will impact ecuXtend due to the fact ecuXtend is a fully software driven product therefore will lend itself to be more flexible in the future in via software enhancements and the like.

Also from the feed back we have had people like the colour display and the like on the ecuXtend rather than the plain old mono LCD the powerfc unit has.

Also the powerfc unit is a complete ecu where ecuxtend is more and extension to the Nissan factory ecu.

how would u hook up to the pda? i didnt think any came with serial/usb ports (that can be used like a normal port would on a laptop/pc, i dont mean something that would only be capable of "syncing" with a computer or whatever the inbuilt connection on many pda's is for)

i was looking into whether its possible to write software for a consult interface on a pda (which essentially is what this is) but stopped cause i go zero response to how to connect up to a pda

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...