Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Turbo’s - Mapping It Out

What are you spinning

Turbochargers compress air. Everyone knows this. Everyone also knows different turbo’s do it differently.

The way in which a particular turbo or, more specifically , the compressor comprising one end of it , compresses air is shown on a compressor efficiency map. Everyone knows about these too, however not everyone knows how to read them properly. In times past, the most difficult aspect of understanding compressor efficiency maps was actually finding one. Most manufacturers didn’t make them available to the general public because it was felt that they’d do more harm than good in the hands of inexperienced users. Turbonetics always include maps in their catalogue but it was about the only company that did. This is changing and more companies are letting people take a look.

Garrett, for instance, has decided that releasing technical information is a good thing and their website is heavily geared toward helping amateurs to understand what turbocharging is all about. They even have an electronic newsletter called Garrett Gearhead to which anyone can subscribe free of charge. Also with the release of the GT range of turbo’s, Garrett has published compressor and turbine performance specifications that are accurate enough to use for selecting a turbo suited to your needs. This is a most welcome change of policy.

So how is it done

Really, a compressor map is just a graph that’s been drawn to represent experimental data obtained by bench testing a particular turbo under laboratory conditions. On such a graph ( pic 1 ) the X-axis (horizontal) represents airflow through the compressor. The Y-axis (vertical) shows the degree of compression that will be achieved for a given amount of air when the rotating assemble of the turbo in question is turning at a certain speed.

On the experimental test bench, the output of the turbo being tested is restricted until a condition called ‘surge’ sets in. In basic terms, this is when the outlet fills up with compressed air that can’t get away quickly enough. When this occurs, flow through the compressor reverses releasing the excessive pressure. ( It’s actually considerably more complex than this but I wont go into details in this post ). Once vented in this way, flow from the compressor resumes in the normal direction until the outlet once again fill’s, at which time flow reverses yet again.

This process of flow reversal continues at high speed until the conditions causing the restriction are removed. In the test laboratory the restriction is caused by a valve that prevents full flow from the turbo. In service, the condition is caused by selecting and fitting a turbo that’s too big for the engine in question. If the engine can’t take the output of the turbo, surge occurs and, if the condition is continuous, damage to the turbo bearings will occur. The various combinations of speed and airflow at which surge occurs are noted and plotted resulting in the surge line.

In the previous paragraphs I touched on a few things, one of them being the Y-axis, or Pressure Ratio. Given that the number is a ratio, its not surprising that it’s obtained by dividing one value by another. In this case it’s Total Pressure divided by Ambient Pressure. In turn, Total Pressure is Ambient Pressure plus Boost Pressure. Therefore, Pressure Ratio is calculated by:

Pressure Ratio = ( ambient pressure + boost pressure ) ÷ Ambient Pressure

To be entirely accurate, Ambient Pressure is pressure before the inlet to the compressor so any losses through the air filter should be subtracted from it. Additionally, Boost Pressure is the pressure going into the engine, so loses through the intercooler should be added to determine the boost back at the compressor outlet. Including the figures gives the more accurate formula:

Pressure Ratio = ( ambient pressure + intercooler loss + boost pressure ) ÷ ( ambient pressure – air filter loss )

The X-axis represents airflow through the turbo. There are different ways of expressing this but for the most part, the figures along this axis will represent pounds of air per minute. This is certainly the case for Garrett and Turbonetics turbo’s. We’re stuck with this state of affairs because most compressor maps that are available come from the U. S which steadfastly refuses to adopt the metric system. So, using imperial figures, we measure engine air consumption in Cubic Feet Per Minute ( CFM ) and this has to be converted to Pounds Per Minute to be of any use in plotting the suitability of a particular turbo /engine combination. Under the conditions at which most compressor efficiency maps are made, one cubic foot of air weighs close enough to 0.070lbs. Therefore, multiplying your flow requirements ( in CFM ) by 0.070lbs will give flow in lbs/min.One formula for determining the flow of a turbocharged engine is:

(engine displacement x volumetric efficiency x pressure ratio x revs) ÷ 2

Dividing by two is necessary because we’re talking about four-stroke engines here and each cylinder is filled with mixture on only every second revolution. As an example, a 2.0-litre engine that’s 90% efficient, turbocharged at a pressure ratio of 1.8, turning 7000rpm would work out to be:

(2 litres x 0.9 x 1.8 x 7000) ÷ 2 = 11340

To convert litres to cubic feet you multiply by 0.0353 and doing so in this case gives:

11340 litres x 0.0353 = 400 cubic feet per minute

Now that we’ve gone from litres to cubic feet we just have to multiply the result by the weight of the air to end up with lbs/min as shown here:

400 cubic feet per minute x 0.07 = 28 pounds

This figure you’d use in finding a suitable turbo for such an engine. You’ll note that 0.9 was transposed for 90% in the example shown. Doing so simplifies this, and many other equations. Also, 90% is a bad efficiency figure for a modern four valve engine.

Air passing through a turbo takes a decent pounding by the time it’s forced to make a 90° turn across the spinning impeller and then fight its way out through the diffuser. Inevitably the speed at which all this occurs causes it to become heated. Efficiency in a turbo really means the degree to which the air emerging from the outlet has been heated. More heat, less efficiency; less heat; more efficiency.

The strange ‘island’ type lines on a compressor map represents regions of efficiency. The central island always represents the region of highest efficiency and the figure for this area is usually around 70 – 80%. Moving further out into the larger islands represents reduced efficiency and higher temperatures. Obviously, the aim is to find a turbo with operating characteristics that see your maximum flow rate firmly in the middle of the region of highest efficiency.

The other lines on a compressor efficiency map represent the rotational speed of the impeller (and rotating assembly as a whole). From the surge line you can see that the lines stay relatively flat and level for a bit but then starts to take a downward slope. The downward slope indicates that the impeller is reaching a point at which it can’t pass anymore air. The flow rate at which the speed line slopes downward so sharply it can be considered vertical is the maximum flow for the particular turbocharger in question. At this point, it doesn’t matter how fast you turn the impeller, no more air can get through the cover. This condition is called ‘choke’ and, like surge, it’s a condition to be avoided.

When a turbo is operating well into conditions of choke the rotating assembly will spin very fast and the aerodynamic efficiency with which the blades interact with the air will be virtually nonexistent. Not surprisingly, this will lead to very hot outlet temperatures. Garrett points out that a turbocharger operated in this way will suffer durability problems.

Selecting That Turbo

So in selecting a turbo, you want to keep your operating point to the right of the surge line, to the left of the choke lines, and in the region of maximum efficiency. To determine if a particular turbo will be suited to your needs you need to work out the airflow requirements as shown above. Then, you need to find the point on the airflow axis (horizontal X-axis) and take a vertical line from that point straight upwards (line 1 on the map figure 1). Then, you should select the pressure ratio you’ve decided to use from the vertical (Y-axis) and extend a horizontal line (line 2) across the graph at that level until it reaches the line representing your airflow. The point at which these lines meet is your maximum operating point. If it’s in the correct region of operation as described above, your half way there. Because the surge line slopes to the right, its closer to the X-axis at lower flow rates. Turbo’s are usually on substantial boost by the time they hit half maximum revs so this point must also be plotted on the map to ensure that its safely positioned in relation to the surge line. Half revs can be considered to correspond to about half the maximum flow rate for this purpose.

Therefore, locate the point of half maximum flow on the X-axis and extend a vertical line upwards (line 3) until it meets your nominated pressure ratio. If it falls to the right of the surge line things are looking even better. The last thing to do is plot a point at 20% of maximum flow and at a pressure ratio of one, and join this line (line 4). If this last line is also to the right of the surge line, the turbocharger represented by the map could be the one for you. We say that a turbocharger that seems to match your requirements in the way described to this point may be the one for you because it may not be exactly what you need. Using a compressor map is just the first step in finding out what turbo is best for you. After you’ve narrowed the field down using the maps, the next step is to get the turbo, bolt it on, strap the whole assembly onto a engine dyno and begin testing.

Remember that if you get lost reading though this and don’t understand compressor maps properly the best solution is to call a turbo specialist. Most of them have years of experience and will generally know what combinations go well with what engines and can guide you from there.

All info was gathered from various performance car magazine articles as well as Garrett turbochargers website. I am aware that if I’m mistaken in publishing this data I will in due course withdraw the submission.

Nuffin_werks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59279-selecting-the-right-turbo/
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...