Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys! I'm new here but I've been reading quite a lot before I registered as a member and learnt so many things. (Well considering that I know nothing at the beginning...)

Anyways, here's my questions. I often hear people talking about transplanting a RB26DETT into their GTS-T. But can you actually replace a RB26DETT in a GTR with a RB25DET engine. I know this sounds a bit weird but really I have no idea about this. Just curious. Can anyone help me here? Thanks!

wow good idea........... you should really do it no do it... bacardi and cola do it doit

why would you bother wondering about this! why not put a twin spark ca20 in there or a diesel hilux motor!

do it do it

sorry man just in shiat mood, but yeh prolly would go in easily, but no one will ever know!

yes it can be done, there is a race built r32 gtr in perth running a rb25 block and rb26 head (i belived he damage his block and swap to the 25 after that happen)

the reason why people dont do it cuz the rb26dett is a much better and suited engine for the gtr

Anything is possible, but.....

The 4WD blocks are different to RWD blocks. The 4WD has the front diff mounted in the sump, and the sump and oil pan rails are further apart and quite different on the 4WD blocks.

If you really want to fit an RB25DET it would have to be from a Stagea 4WD. Or you could use a non turbo RB25DE block from an R33 GTS-4 which is also 4WD.

While you can put an RB26DETT into a GTST, by butchering the sump a bit, it would be pretty difficult to go the other way. There is a company somewhere in NZ which makes an adapter plate to fit the 4WD sump to "normal" rear wheel drive RB engines. Guys that fit RB30 blocks to GTRs use this plate, or have to make up something similar themselves.

Apart from the oil pan rails the RB25 and RB26 blocks are pretty much identical. Cranks, rods and pistons can be swapped either way, and drop right in.

You can build up an RB26DETT using an RB25 block for a GTST and all the GTR bits. This keeps the old RB25 engine number (hint) and the original skinny sump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...