Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My guess, in the "after tuning" A/F ratios the lean running at high rpm is nothing to do with the DFA. The sudden upwards flick is generally a sign of a failing fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator on the way out, blocked fuel filter or dirty injectors. I would have those potential issues eliminated before trying any further tuning.

The lumpy power graph is a dead give away for the standard ECU rich and retard mapping. So is the random black smoke (rich). R&R is triggered by AFM readings outside what the ECU expects, so any unexpected deviation from normal causes the ECU to adopt R&R mapping.

The 0.2 volts difference between input and output voltage is unacceptable, that is more than many of the correction factors you will input. It really needs to be trimmed out. If it is consistent (eg; always 0.2 volts higher at all input voltages) then it doesn't matter if you are tuning on the dyno, because the mapping will compensate for the input/output difference. It certainly matters if it is not consistent (eg; 4.6 volts in doesn't always = 4.8 volts out) or if you want to compare settings with others. Yours will always be several load points different to compensate for the 0.2 volts error.

If it is a consistent 0.2 volts out at all input voltages, my first check would be the resistor values. An incorrectly placed resistor will most certainly cause that sort of issue.

:) cheers ;)

All the resistor values should be correct I double checked with a multimeter all there values.

I did find with the calibration that when I had the multimeter on the input side as soon as I took the multimeter off it the load point would change by about 3 points. i.e. would go from 100 to 103 or something similar. I thought the multimeter was zapping some of the voltage as I was only using the silly trimpot that would fluctuate quite a bit

For the boost restricting thingie majig :(

is this basically what u need to do even tho i realise the 'tubing' is different lengths? (swaping the inner 'restricter')

also do Stagea's have a solenoid? (RB25DET from R34)

post-12759-1133840369.jpg

Edited by illusiVe
For the boost restricting thingie majig :(

is this basically what u need to do even tho i realise the 'tubing' is different lengths? (swaping the inner 'restricter')

also do Stagea's have a solenoid? (RB25DET from R34)

Yes, zakkery the same as R33GTST

:) cheers :D

another noob question.

IF i installed the EBC without any changes... are all settings programed to 0? if so that would mean the wastegate = COMPLETELY CLOSED (i think) = u dont want to hit boost.

so do i need to enter any settings before i kill my turbo being the noob i am :(

another noob question.

IF i installed the EBC without any changes... are all settings programed to 0? if so that would mean the wastegate = COMPLETELY CLOSED (i think) = u dont want to hit boost.

so do i need to enter any settings before i kill my turbo being the noob i am :(

Takes about 1 minute to change them all to 0. Then low boost, if any boost at all.

:) cheers :D

so when i install the IEBC that it will take the current settings i have, then i can adjust the curve from that, defult on the IEBC is NOT 'locking' the wastegate closed (god im stupid).. and i am soo buying that book... that'll learn me

Thanks SydneyKid, I was thinking there was a problem with one of those things too

I'm doing the fuel filter this weekend and cleaning out the injectors.

For testing the injectors is looking at injector duty cycle % enough to determine if it is faulty/clogged or not?

Thanks SydneyKid, I was thinking there was a problem with one of those things too

I'm doing the fuel filter this weekend and cleaning out the injectors.

For testing the injectors is looking at injector duty cycle % enough to determine if it is faulty/clogged or not?

Nope, injector duty is what the ECU is telling the injector, not what the injector is actually doing. Unfortunately it is an injector out, clean and flow test job.

:P cheers :D

Hey All,

I went to the dyno yesterday and got my DFA tuned. It took an hour and a half. This is what we did,

-Adjusted the fuel trim.

Some one will have to explan this to me but he added in more fuel down low. I've seen this on SAFC graphs and I dont get why you increase the voltage at cruise levels.

Power run - low boost.

Suprisingly, my fuel ratios were 12.5\1 with out any adjustments. I put this dwn to a slight BIAS of about -0.03 volts at the top end.

-tuned the IEBC to about 11 PSI.

-High boost run

Now for the bad news.

He found that at high revs the ECU was pulling out a heap of timing - and getting up on the knock sensor.

Timing was found to be at base 20 deg. for some reason unbeknowst to me, so he pulled base back to 18.

Still had issues. Hooked up the fuel pressure guage and foung that PSI was dropping from 51 PSI to around 40 at high revs. Looks like the fuel pump is shagged. This will also account for the 12.5\1 fuel ratios that magically happened on the low boost runs.

SO, we actually added more fuel in at the top. I'll need to go back after the fuel pump is replaced to retune the top end.

The DFA seemed to work really well in what it was suppose to do.

A couple of extra things I found was that I hooked up a Ford EL o2 sensor half a week ago and the tuner said it wouldn't work as he had a 32 that came in with the same thing and it didn't work - however, when we plugged in the laptop and checked out the sensor reading it was working. AFR's on his sensor were good too. So there's one myth busted. Mind you, It's probably different between models. Mine's a Series 1 R33.

The other was the flames that were coming out the back on high boost. Looked good, but I've no idea if it was good or bad for the car!!

All in all, it was a fun day.. No hard reving for me though until the fuel pump is replaced.

Dyno graph is attached. He says his dyno read 10% lower than normal..

Looks to be about 170rwkws.

post-19015-1134012297.jpg

Hey All,

I went to the dyno yesterday and got my DFA tuned.  It took an hour and a half. This is what we did,

-Adjusted the fuel trim.

Some one will have to explan this to me but he added in more fuel down low.  I've seen this on SAFC graphs and I dont get why you increase the voltage at cruise levels.

Power run - low boost.

Suprisingly, my fuel ratios were 12.5\1 with out any adjustments.  I put this dwn to a slight BIAS of about -0.03 volts at the top end.

-tuned the IEBC to about 11 PSI.

-High boost run

Now for the bad news.

He found that at high revs the ECU was pulling out a heap of timing - and getting up on the knock sensor.

Timing was found to be at base 20 deg. for some reason unbeknowst to me,  so he pulled base back to 18. 

Still had issues.  Hooked up the fuel pressure guage and foung that PSI was dropping from 51 PSI to around 40 at high revs.  Looks like the fuel pump is shagged.  This will also account for the 12.5\1 fuel ratios that magically happened on the low boost runs.

SO, we actually added more fuel in at the top.  I'll need to go back after the fuel pump is replaced to retune the top end.

The DFA seemed to work really well in what it was suppose to do.

A couple of extra things I found was that I hooked up a Ford EL o2 sensor half a week ago and the tuner said it wouldn't work as he had a 32 that came in with the same thing and it didn't work - however, when we plugged in the laptop and checked out the sensor reading it was working.  AFR's on his sensor were good too.  So there's one myth busted.  Mind you, It's probably different between models.  Mine's a Series 1 R33.

The other was the flames that were coming out the back on high boost.  Looked good, but I've no idea if it was good or bad for the car!!

All in all, it was a fun day..  No hard reving for me though until the fuel pump is replaced.

Dyno graph is attached.  He says his dyno read 10% lower than normal..

Looks to be about 170rwkws.

That's a pretty nice ~25 rwhp gain from 3,000 rpm up to almost 6,000 rpm. Must feel much quicker right in the meat of the commonly used rpm range.

Yep, adding some fuel low down is very common. I think it is needed because of the usual efficiency improvements, larger exhaust, air filter, freer flowing cat and intercooler etc. But I reckon the main reason is, Nissan tunes them for minimum emmisions, hence lean as possible where it is safe (off boost). When you are going for the best power, emmissions is no longer a limiting factor.

:rolleyes: cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
That's a pretty nice ~25 rwhp gain from 3,000 rpm up to almost 6,000 rpm.  Must feel much quicker right in the meat of the commonly used rpm range.

Yep, adding some fuel low down is very common.  I think it is needed because of the usual efficiency improvements, larger exhaust, air filter, freer flowing cat and intercooler etc.  But I reckon the main reason is, Nissan tunes them for minimum emmisions, hence lean as possible where it is safe (off boost).  When you are going for the best power, emmissions is no longer a limiting factor.

:D cheers :)

Yer, he had 2 dials on his software that he had to match. I think one was the ECUs target and the other was the calculation of the afr, and he said that because they didn't match, the ecu's fuel trim was adding fuel to compensate (?) (got no idea hey... :) ) Interesting though...

This is one informative thread!!

A big thank you to you Sydneykid - you have answered so many q's in heaps of depth!

Now for mine :angry: !!

If you could help me out here it would be appreciated. I am looking at using one of these IBC's but I am not applying this to a skyline - since however you (and so many others now) have such a great understanding of this device, along with the DFA, I am hoping you can help me out...

I am building a turbo 202 (yes it is a bl00dy holden!!) which has the old style k-jetronic (however you spell it) efi system on it, so the injectors all fire at the same time and it also just uses an air flow meter.

Do you think this IBC will still work ok since it is designed to sit on only one injector? From what I understand about the system I will be using the injectors will still fire at the same rate as any given injector in a multi point injection system so I am presuming it will work?

Any advice would be appreciated....

Void

This is one informative thread!!

A big thank you to you Sydneykid - you have answered so many q's in heaps of depth!

Now for mine :D !!

If you could help me out here it would be appreciated.  I am looking at using one of these IBC's but I am not applying this to a skyline - since however you (and so many others now) have such a great understanding of this device, along with the DFA, I am hoping you can help me out...

I am building a turbo 202 (yes it is a bl00dy holden!!) which has the old style k-jetronic (however you spell it) efi system on it, so the injectors all fire at the same time and it also just uses an air flow meter.

Do you think this IBC will still work ok since it is designed to sit on only one injector?  From what I understand about the system I will be using the injectors will still fire at the same rate as any given injector in a multi point injection system so I am presuming it will work?

Any advice would be appreciated....

Void

Oh my, a red motor, I owned one of those......once.......

The IEBC should work, it only needs a trigger signal that varies in length (gets longer) with engine load. Maybe stick a cro on it first, just to check what the injector signal looks like.

:( cheers :)

Oh my, a red motor, I owned one of those......once.......

The IEBC should work, it only needs a trigger signal that varies in length (gets longer) with engine load.  Maybe stick a cro on it first, just to check what the injector signal looks like.

:D cheers :D

Cheers mate - thanks.

Oh and for your information it is a BLACK motor!!! not a snotty little red :D hehe..

Just a simple question about wiring the solenoid to the IEBC - does the IEBC ground the wire connected to the solenoid, in the same way as the ECU normally does to open it? Or does the solenoid need to be rewired so the IEBC operates it via a positive signal, rather than an earth?

Takes about 1 minute to change them all to 0.  Then low boost, if any boost at all.

:D cheers :(

Isn't it the other way around? If all settings are at 0 the solenoid will stay closed, therefore the wastegate will see zero boost, therefore boost will hit maximum?

I would have thought all settings would need to be at 100%.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What 1.5 way? There's no such thing really as a 1.5 way, just different ways of explaining 2 ways with different ramp rates. HOWEVER. In any driving in a straight line your 1.5 or 2 or 1.7 way should have no clunking at all. With the clutch fully depressed the diff should be silent (unless it's welded but I'm assuming it's not). Something aint right here.
    • Clutch is a spec brand, new clutch system,( PP, flywheel, friction disc, etc. pull type) installed 100 miles ago, with no problems.
    • looking for some help and maybe some insight on others experience with a new LSD. R34 GT ran and drove beautifully, but always alot of grip loss due to the open R200 rear end, so I just installed a new 1.5 LSD way into the stock open R200 for a ER34. Simple. Everything seemed right. I test drove for the first time this weekend. as I started to back out the garage the first time slowly with tires straight it sounded and felt like I had a loose or half disconnected drive shaft...that was clucking around loose and shaking entire vehicle, and making it feel like the trans clutch was spontaneously slipping then grabbing very roughly while just letting out pedal slowly. I backed it out went to pull forward with the same noise, shake and slip grab feeling with hesitation, I turned the tires to back out more and then pulled ahead some same thing but worst because of added wheel resistance (which that I expected) puzzled … pulling it back in checking everything over and finding nothing wrong, I tried it the next day. same thing, couldn’t believe how it shook everything again making a terrible noise and making it feel like the trans clutch was slipping and grabbing, but I got it out of garage into the driveway, got it straight, drove forward and then reveres a few times in a straight line everything shaking , causing what felt like clutch slip and grab every time, sounded like right behind front driver tire and I could feel it in the floor board with my feet,... worst right when beginning to let clutch pedal out to engage slightly, shuttering and sounding terrible along the way…I managed to slowly get down the road, babying it the whole way, once I was rolling (out of 1st) seemed to be better and between shifts, then clutch felt closer to normal…not slip/ grab etc., but back down to any stop, straight road or turning, same thing. Made no difference if all tires were straight or if I was turning. All other gauge read out correct. with in 2 miles as planned I reached the empty parking lot and performed the break in procedure that came with lsd, essentially to drive in a figure 8 a bunch.  Did this, binding chattering, and shaking the car the whole way. I drove it back home seemed somewhat normal once I was in straight line and past 10 mph or so, and I know it will “bind” on corners and cause some tires squeal when turning especially from a stop, but when I begin to move it still causes what feels like the trans clutch to slip and jerk badly as well as shaking the entire car, and sounds terrible, that I didn’t expect. I used the fluid they supplied with LSD kit and did the breaking, planning to change fluid as they suggest after breaking, but wondering will it get smoother or less aggressive with use? maybe a 1.5 is just too aggressive for normal road driving?   I have a LSD that I put in my 71 cuda when I restored it, with amazing smooth , quite yet effective results. Different style LSD but that ones a joy to drive. maybe expecting too much from this R200?
    • Join SAU NSW for a flame-grilled feed & flame-spitting cruise! Sunday 17th August 2025 3:30PM Meeting Archies Flame Grille Sylvania Waters 4:45PM Cruise Departure 5:15PM Arrival at Cape Solander Kurnell Meet Location: Archies Flame Grille Final Destination: Cape Solander Kurnell *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • Yeah good luck out there! Will be good to see a mighty GTST going harder than the GTRs
×
×
  • Create New...