Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:) CAUTION LONG RANT FOLLOWS... :)

Let me start by saying the STTF (State Traffic Task Force) are ghey... As ghey as they come actually... I got my first defect... Well Trina did actually... Story goes like this:

Friday night, Trina is driving along the M1 at the speed limit minding her own business... A marked car on the side of the road doing LIDAR sees her go past, get in their car, speed along the highway to catch her, and pull her over... They approach the car and inform her that she has been pulled over for a "Random" Breath Test... Which she passes fine... They then ask her where she is going and where she has been... And then let her on her way... At no point do they ask to see her license, or ask if she is the owner of the vehicle (which she isn't)... Doesn't seem very random to me... :( Actually sounds like discrimination against Skyline owners...

Sunday arvo, Trina is driving along the M1 at the speed limit minding her own business... She notices a late model Falcon station wagon pull in behind her... Falcon decides to tailgate her for a few k's.. She pays no attention to them assuming that they are tailgating because they want to overtake but cant because the RHL is full... After a few minutes of tailgating, said Falcon turns on the blues and directs Trina to pull over...

They defected her for the following... In their words:

- Ensure windscreen complies with ADRs ie replace windscreen.

- Ensure rear wing complies ie shorten width so fits within boot line and has rounded edges on all surfaces.

They didn't defect her for the following:

EDIT: Many other possible defects...

So they lose and I win :D

They missed booking people for the following unsafe acts on the roads today:

- A 4WD with a large trailer performing a 3 point U-Turn over double lines on a blind corner...

- A 75yr old pop driving at 60kph on the freeway in the middle lane with his right indicator on - for many, many kilometres...

- A VN Commodore swerving across 3 lanes of 110kph traffic and then over a traffic island to get to his exit...

- Numerous drivers using mobile phones...

But I did see a brand new Mercedes Benz with many airbags and a bucketload of active and passive safety features get flashed by a speed camera for doing 125 odd in a 110 zone... So they are "trying" to keep us safe :)

Anyway, it's a self clearance defect so basically all I have to do is sign the form and send it away saying the defects have been cleared... Nobody has to look at it... Weird huh?

I was already going to replace the windscreen due to the smallish crack that happened a few weeks ago... But it's on the passenger side, and not visible from the drivers seat (due to the rear view mirror) and all I can find on windscreens and ADR's says:

No material or other object is to be located on the windscreen or windows which will interfere with the driver’s vision.
If I can't see it when I'm driving how is it interfering with my vision :confused:

But the wing is a different story...

Side skirts, flares, front and rear spoilers may be fitted, provided road clearance and air flow for brake cooling is not adversely affected. All exposed edges must have a radius of at least 5 mm.

Radiused edges, fine... Stupid rule but whatever... But nowhere there does it say wings must fit within boot lines... WTF are boot lines anyway? The wing is well within the boundarys of the car (IE it doesn't hang out over the edge of the body) so I have NFI what they are on about... Sounds like a "quick make something up" rule to me... But that couldn't be right could it?

The other thing I don't understand is that they told Trina that after I sign the form and send it away, if I get caught with the same defects again, it's a $275 fine... Which is dumb... Cause if I get a new windscreen, and then it gets cracked by some rock thrown up by an unregistered, rusted out, no brakes, sigma, driving through a massive pothole on an unmaintained, poorly signed, backroad... And then the cops see me immediately afterwards, I'm screwed... Same goes for the wing... I take it off, sign the form, send it away, and put on a "different" wing, how can they tell?

So there you have it... My first defect, my first defect thread... Can a mod please move this to the VIC section? :rofl:

PS: STTF are teh ghey...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess I got off lightly all things considered, and it won't be a hassle to clear it...

It just gives me the irrits when all they bloody do is target import driver's when there are much more serious traffic offences out there, as well as plenty of DANGEROUSLY unroadworthy cars on the roads...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162929
Share on other sites

I hate STTF, and too the clown who got me! Get me agian, and you wont be working for Qld police agian. (don't ask)

I found they also love to free rev your motor, and when the BOV still doesnt go off at 4000rpm, they'll find somthing else to bitch about.

discrimination against Skyline owners...

I tried that one in court... It doesn't work, as much as it's true.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162934
Share on other sites

bahahaha i love it :(

"The other thing I don't understand is that they told Trina that after I sign the form and send it away, if I get caught with the same defects again, it's a $275 fine... Which is dumb... Cause if I get a new windscreen, and then it gets cracked by some rock thrown up by an unregistered, rusted out, no brakes, sigma, driving through a massive pothole on an unmaintained, poorly signed, backroad... And then the cops see me immediately afterwards, I'm screwed... Same goes for the wing... I take it off, sign the form, send it away, and put on a "different" wing, how can they tell?"

classic

bloody cops, what the hell is going on, is george bush running our police now too?!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162936
Share on other sites

Also.. I duno if you have to take your car to the nearest station to be "cleared", if you do just put the car in Tina's name.. And the defect clears. As soon as the car is in another name it no longer counts, and you no longer legally have to show them the car to clear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162943
Share on other sites

Also.. I duno if you have to take your car to the nearest station to be "cleared", if you do just put the car in Tina's name.. And the defect clears. As soon as the car is in another name it no longer counts, and you no longer legally have to show them the car to clear.

haha

ahh the justice of loopholes :kick:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162948
Share on other sites

Also.. I duno if you have to take your car to the nearest station to be "cleared", if you do just put the car in Tina's name.. And the defect clears. As soon as the car is in another name it no longer counts, and you no longer legally have to show them the car to clear.

Nah all I have to do is send the form away with my signature on it, and it's cleared...

But thanks for the hot tip! I'm sure it'll come in handy :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162955
Share on other sites

In some case’s you might be better off just getting the car cleared, eg; minor defect. In my case I was selling the car anyway, and getting my defects fixed out weighed the cost of the fine - $75 and 1 point (which you cant get out of if you change names).

Lucky you only got away with just signing the paper work!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162962
Share on other sites

can you take these ones to court?

I've always thought having a tape recorder would get you off any defect if it went to court.

"ok officer, so you are defecting me for xxx"

"yes, that is correct"

"under what Australian design rule are you defecting me for, and/or which roadworthy requirement are you defecting me for under the laws of Queensland?"

"um, er.. << b.s. answer >> "

* I'd imagine that would probably get you off in any court case right away. Unless they can state a valid statue, down to the finest letter then its not a valid defect I'd imagine.

"how have you come to the determination that this vehicle is in breach of this requirement?"

Now that is most likely where they'll fall in a heap, with no accurate measure how can they even legally defect you. The more questions you asked here the better you'd be off later on.

As an example, maybe for height if they say "well I have this fancy measuring doovy".. but then you start drilling them on the angle of the road, sprung weight and all sorts of other crap :(

Court case comes, sounds like cop doesn't even know the laws he is enforcing.. you're off the hook.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162975
Share on other sites

Also.. I duno if you have to take your car to the nearest station to be "cleared", if you do just put the car in Tina's name.. And the defect clears. As soon as the car is in another name it no longer counts, and you no longer legally have to show them the car to clear.

wont it cost money to transfer the rego :confused: or can you bannana benders get away with that too - J/K :)

Yeh its good to see the my taxed income being put to bad use!! :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162976
Share on other sites

can you take these ones to court?  

I've always thought having a tape recorder would get you off any defect if it went to court.  

"ok officer, so you are defecting me for xxx"

"yes, that is correct"

"under what Australian design rule are you defecting me for, and/or which roadworthy requirement are you defecting me for under the laws of Queensland?"

"um, er..  << b.s. answer >> "

* I'd imagine that would probably get you off in any court case right away. Unless they can state a valid statue, down to the finest letter then its not a valid defect I'd imagine.  

"how have you come to the determination that this vehicle is in breach of this requirement?"

Now that is most likely where they'll fall in a heap, with no accurate measure how can they even legally defect you.  

Maybe for height if they say "well I have this fancy measuring doovy".. but then you start drilling them on the angle of the road, sprung weight and all sorts of other crap :(  

Court case comes, sounds like cop doesn't even know the laws he is enforcing.. you're off the hook.

Nah - theyd just pull you out of your ride and bash you for bein a smart ass - specially in Vic!! :wassup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162980
Share on other sites

wont it cost money to transfer the rego :confused: or can you bannana benders get away with that too - J/K :)  

Yeh its good to see the my taxed income being put to bad use!!  :(

In my case.. it worked out well. as I was selling the car. Yes it would cost money in transfer fee's, but as I said above, in some case's it works out cheaper then clearing major defects. You wouldn't do this if it was somthing minor.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162985
Share on other sites

can you take these ones to court?  

I've always thought having a tape recorder would get you off any defect if it went to court.  

"ok officer, so you are defecting me for xxx"

"yes, that is correct"

"under what Australian design rule are you defecting me for, and/or which roadworthy requirement are you defecting me for under the laws of Queensland?"

"um, er..  << b.s. answer >> "

* I'd imagine that would probably get you off in any court case right away. Unless they can state a valid statue, down to the finest letter then its not a valid defect I'd imagine.  

"how have you come to the determination that this vehicle is in breach of this requirement?"

Now that is most likely where they'll fall in a heap, with no accurate measure how can they even legally defect you. The more questions you asked here the better you'd be off later on.  

As an example, maybe for height if they say "well I have this fancy measuring doovy".. but then you start drilling them on the angle of the road, sprung weight and all sorts of other crap :)  

Court case comes, sounds like cop doesn't even know the laws he is enforcing.. you're off the hook.

exactly, even better get a hold of the book mechanics get when they go through training which states the only "legal" way to test exhasuts, height etc. It's well, pretty much impossible to test anything legally. They are supposed to test the device against something impartial every second test, be in a clear 1km area or something, take into account wind, road angle etc etc...list goes on. In short contest everything, sometimes you just never here back :(, however sometimes it goes to court and costs you money, because the judge thinks your a hoon in a car that goes pssht.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1162992
Share on other sites

As for discrimination thats a big YES. Coz im yet to see a force dedicated to getting rid of the old sh*ttas on the road. Or maybe one dedicated to instead of monitoring young drivers, monitor old ones. Even better again a force dedicated to monitoring all the police that do the wrong thing whilst driving???? The amount of times ive seen them break the road laws for no apparent reason, eg stopping on a street for no reason, reversing up a street to talk to a young person who was minding his own business :( (looks to josh), talk on their mobiles.....I thought it was learn by example, clearly im wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61591-discrimination/#findComment-1163001
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...