Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a turbo back exhaust will give you a couple of psi but the filter does nothing .im running a pod with stock exhaust and no boost increase is noticable

the wastegate is not "active" . it is set to a mechanical level which equals a certain amount of boost . if you remove the restriction the turbo will produce more boost at the original set actuator level . if you had an active electronic boost controller which was constantly monitoring the actual manifold pressure and adjusting accordingly then it would stop the boost going over a certain level , which is what hey do to stop spiking .

i probably didnt explain that well but hopefully you get the idea

i read about 0.7-0.8kg/cm2 with pod & exhaust on a 32gtst

(which is about 10-11psi). No other engine mods.

If wastegate is fully open, on a stock system this equals 7psi. So if you remove restriction, the turbo produces more boost, so the amount of boost you'll read with wastegate fully open will be more.

I think that's right... someone correct me if im wrong.

I still find this hard to understand as the pressure the actuator sees is tapped into compressor outlet (Or on most turbos anyway). If it's configured to hold boost at 7psi...then it should do this no matter what - that's what it is there for. Obviously the turbo will be more efficeint with less back pressure but really if you have a 5psi actuator thats what it should be fully open at - and open before to maintain that as a maximum.

This is the first turbo car I've had and I haven't played with boost so I don't know the practical side of what happens when you free up the exhaust. I would have thought that the wastegate should just open earlier with a better exhaust to maintain the same psi. It just may get to peak boost earlier.

the wastegate cant vent any more exhaust , the actuator is set to certain point . if that was 7psi and now the turbo is more efficient and producing 10 the wastegate can not do anything about it , its already at its set level . If you had an adjustable actuator you could open it more assuming it wasnt all the way open already and vent more gas out the wastegate producing less boost .

thats my understanding of it anyway .

This is fantastic!

I asked the same question about 1 yr ago and i don't thik i got a very satisfactory explanation.

But the 'mechanical' bit makes alot of sense to me.

I can get my head around that.

I would love someone to get a camera under the hood wacthing the actuator arm with another camera watching the revs/boost, put the images side by side and watch a full dyno run and actually see it work and what really happens.

pretty much on the money.

the restirction causes un-due backpressure.

Backpressure is the enemy of boost

I can understand how backpressure is the enemy of response and gas flow.

But you explain to us how it can effect the spring tension in the actuator.

Which after all is acted on directly by the inlet manifold pressure.

A lot of magazines and on forums people say - fit bigger exhaust and you

will gain a psi or 2 but I still can't understand based on what I wrote

above. Most factory actuators will open slightly before the 5psi or

whatever boost they are designed to hold boost at. This is so that there

will be no boost spikes etc.

....Ok listen to this:

The wastegate will always dump enough boost before it gets to the desired

level so that it vever exceeds this figure.

With the new exhaust it may make the boost easier and with greater flow.

however the peak boost should be the sameI think if the actuator is left

unchanged.

with the backpressure posing a restriction with the stocko exhaust on, the most the turbo can produce will be 7 psi but when you remove the backpressure the actuator won't have changed, truth be known the actuator is prolly set for 10psi but due the restrctive exhaust etc... it only flow 7 psi

I don't believe that. a 5psi actuator is a 5psi actuator. They are tapped into the inlet pressure to control the wastegate flap to maintain this level of boost. The difference that an exhaust would make would be similar to the differnece between eg. High load and low revs in 4th…this allows boost to grow quicker, compared with say flooring it in 1st from low revs…there is less load so boost doesn't reach its maximum till a little later in the rev range. The actuator still maanages to maintain boost at the predetermined level no matter what the scenario.

mine doesnt , its spike city . Theres about a 3psi varience using the stock actuator depending on the conditions , ie gear load etc . the stock boost guage doesnt show these but good aftermarket guage will.

You do realise that the stock actuator on an RB25 is 5psi. If you're getting spiking

it would be more to do with the 7psi factory boost control solenoid.

I can understand how backpressure is the enemy of response and gas flow.

But you explain to us how it can effect the spring tension in the actuator.

Which after all is acted on directly by the inlet manifold pressure.

i dont know.

Same happened in a few turbo cars ive had.

My stock RB20... went from 7psi to 9psi with a 3" exhaust.

backpressure was less, car was more responsive, boost came on earlier.

Its in the practice that it works.

You do realise that the stock actuator on an RB25 is 5psi. If you're getting spiking

it would be more to do with the 7psi factory boost control solenoid.

hmm

the factory boost control solenoid is not plummed in . An ebc solenoid is in its place but that it switched off cause the ebc is not working so it just passes thru . so the only thing controlling boost should be the stock actuator

  • 10 months later...

disbelieve it all you want but the facts are bigger exhaust means slight boost increase

not sure why...

i have a R32 GTR 3" dumps and 3" straight thu exhaust (and apexi pods) after removing boost restrictor

i am running 14 psi NO ebc or bleed valves or anything of that nature

but i am installing EBC this week to stop boost spiking (luckly never had, would destroy my stockers)

RellikZephyr

im the same. i got a 3" exhaust, fmic and solenoid mod (so it's always in high boost mode) and in a R33, i get 11psi from my gauge. does fmic and exhaust make 3 psi?

i'm a bit hesitant as i don't have the cash to replace the turbo if it blows, and i hear it here all the time about overboosting the stock turbs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
    • The factory oil pressure sender is no longer in the car that's what is confusing me. In the Taarks adapter I have an aftermarket Bosch style pressure/temp sender and the factory temp sender only. Oil pressure is perfect. Where does the factory oil temp sender go to if there were never any gauges? Why was it there from the factory?
×
×
  • Create New...