Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm changing my gf's coolant this weekend.

It's very rusty and sludgy so I got a bottle of radiator cleaner. You add it to the coolant, run engine for 20 min, drain the coolant and then it says to flush the system.

How do I flush the coolant system?

I've been reading that reverse flushing the system is the way to go - so do i just stick the hose up the drain plug and crank up the pressure or what?

Thanks guys

Greg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62427-changing-coolant-and-flushing-system/
Share on other sites

I saw its best to disconnect the top pipe, have the engine running at idle, and just fill the radiator with the garden hose at the same rate that it empties. When the water coming out turns clear its done. Let the radiator empty a little so theres space for the coolant.

I wonder how UAS do a flush? I read on their site that they only use demineralised water, dosent come from the tap :cheers:

On the side of the block there is a plug to drain the water from the water jackets around the cylinders, dont know if people actually do this or they just do similar to what you have mentioned. In the work shop manual it recomends to undo the plug to let the water drain from there as well as from the radiator hoses.

  • 2 months later...

Another way would be to remove the the Thermo housing (and while its out test the Thermo) and run the pressurised water into the radiator and through the engine. If you have access to an air compressor you could flush out the water after with the air, then reconnect everything (you will need to use a silicone gasket to reseal the thermo housing) and refil with appropriate water and collant.

Cheers

To remove gunk from radiator, it is obviously best to reverse the water flow through it! Normally, the water flows from top to bottom. If you remove the radiator cap, and the bottom hose, and use a garden hose from the bottom [preferably sealed as much as possible - wrap a rag or something around it.., it will remove UPWARDS that which has lodged in tubes from above.

The thermostat will stop flow to other parts, so that this will concentrate on cleaning rad. Then use other suggestions to flush out block,etc. Think about where the flow is going when you're doing these things, so that you don't dislodge rubbish from,say, block,and deposit it in radiator.

Remember that larger pieces may be dislodged than can't pass thru radiator tubes, so you can actually make it worse, if you're not thinking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...