Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

doenst really matter about the plates...but if you claim it to be "the toughest" u'd expect it to be fast....hence it would be nice to see what time its run and whats actually done to the car? Meh who cares...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1186122
Share on other sites

the owner martin had william and rob from 101 do all the performance work on the car the car does have nos but hasn't been used as the car has standard internals which is about to change as of last night when the motor deseased it self after a photo shoot down the coast. The car has all the bits for speed but was tuned on low boost when at jam 04 the car was only on the road for a week or so before that. It will be back on the street this year sometime as funds permit and will have the power to back up the plates. It did have 380hp at 10 pound prior to this without nos. Like someone said don't rubbish him unless you know him because thats the way he his, look on boostcruisin and see what he responds when people bag him. Its a fat car and thats that admire it and get over it, AND HOW CAN THE CAR BE THE FASTEST IN REDLANDS WHEN HE LIVES ON THE NORTHSIDE, TO MY KNOWLEDGE THE CAR ONLY DOES NEAR REDLANDS WHEN HE'S TRAVELLING DOWN THE GATEWAY MOTORWAY ON THE WAY TO THE COAST

JC aka sed8

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1187977
Share on other sites

yea thats the only thread there is...so i dont really see what rbs13 is talking about, he barely says anything.....meh the car sounds alright but i dont think its as good as what some ppl might talk it up to be.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1188329
Share on other sites

Lets just say that i was one on the road one saturday nite and saw a Black R33 GTR (basically stock running stock boost = 215kw @ all 4s) chop DRAGME pretty easy. And when the GTR went for a 2nd run, DRAGME didnt want anything of it....

IWIN would bEAT DRAGME for dinner...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1188333
Share on other sites

look on boostcruisin and see what he responds when people bag him.

His whole 8 posts ever you mean...and half of them describe how he's lost a total of $60K by giving someone $30K...which they ran off with...then the other "workshop" stripped his whole car of $30K's worth of gear?

As if you'd even admit to such stupid shite...if it actually ever happened.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1188426
Share on other sites

For all those of you who reckons they got the toughest car, Well damn i might just have the right tree, right here in my front yard for you to prove me wrong!!!! The tree can nevar lose.

Also some ppls like to drive gtst , they give more of a sleepr appeal than a in ya face gtr,

It's been said, "It's hurts more when you are beaten by a lesser opOnent, than a greater one" umm i just made that up. HAHA.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62432-dragme/page/2/#findComment-1188456
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...