Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently a mate of mine got done by the EPA. He has a mirage which has been turbocharged and now he needs to get it back to NA... dunno exact details. However, he will go thru alot of money and anguish over this.

Planning on having my GTR worked, though the visual impact will be much less.. almost stock looking. and obviously this is very different to the mirages case but....

wat do i need to do in order to avoid any problems with the epa? is it worth getting engineers cert?

i am getting HKS GT-SS turbs... obviously hard to see and PowerFC. should i take any precautions or will it most likely be ok?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/
Share on other sites

Recently a mate of mine got done by the EPA. He has a mirage which has been turbocharged and now he needs to get it back to NA... dunno exact details. However, he will go thru alot of money and anguish over this.

Planning on having my GTR worked, though the visual impact will be much less.. almost stock looking. and obviously this is very different to the mirages case but....

wat do i need to do in order to avoid any problems with the epa? is it worth getting engineers cert?

i am getting HKS GT-SS turbs... obviously hard to see and PowerFC. should i take any precautions or will it most likely be ok?

PowerFC would be a mistake... My understanding is that the EPA looks for any changes to emmissions control devices, so the ECU is out. The fines can be quite substantial ($10K+), so it's not worth it. Now, using an R32 computer and getting it re-programmed would be a lot harder for the EPA to pick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192682
Share on other sites

Engineers wont fix it.

you need a full EPA test if you change anything that alters your emissions.

Its your gamble  :(

True, the EPA can still get you even with an engineer's certificate.

However, I would've thought, though, that programmable engine management (i.e PowerFC) would be advisable as you can lean the mixtures out so that the emissions are not too high. Wouldn't stock ecu's run the car rich, therefore have higher emissions??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192920
Share on other sites

Damn HKS34R, nice avatar ;)

While its true about programable engine management having the posibility of a cleaner tune, i think the epa's issue would be that anyone using such ECU's have other mods and thats what they dont like, let alone the fact that the ECU is a mod in itself, and dont most of them say somewhere "for race or offroad use"?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192996
Share on other sites

is this all the same for nsw ? or is it restricted to per state ....

should we worry about ANY mods being picked up on by the epa .. wouldnt then all those ricers with hyundai excels and 4" exhausts get kicked off the roads all the time ?

being somewhat new the country, this is all of great interest to me ...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1193020
Share on other sites

You could show them your car having better emissions than standard ecu but there is nothing to stop you programming later on to be worse than standard.

But you can reprogram the stock ecu as well in many cars...

I think what Ash is saying.. is you can get a full (expensive) emissions test just for your vehicle, no matter what the mods, as long as it is below the standard levels. I guess after that, any tune would invalidate that (I think I remember hearing some people that did have the full test were required to get their ECU "locked" to the tune it was tested with). This would vary by state though.

The reason why they instantly dismiss any aftermarket ECU is that there is no standard yardstick soon as you start tampering with the factory setup. A "S-AFC" could be under, or it could be over depending on the tune.. there is no way of telling without doing the full comprehensive test.

It's :bs!: and there would be ways to come up with much quicker verification of mods vs emissions, but obviously there are reasons not to do that from higher up in government.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1193601
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry I meant that we are building the EH for a client.
    • LOL, when one "money pit" is never enough Noice, and excellent work mate
    • I have more than enough digging, laying blocks, moving gravel, airrating, feeding and top soiling the grass, and setting up the veggie gardens growing some seedlings,  and then removing all the unused rock to keep me busy for the next few months at least,  hopefully the rain stops soon so I can get a few hours in this arvo, but, before that Sunday is washing day, is every body happy, you bet your life we are Nice country road day drives are a day off whenever I'm muscle sore from all the landscaping at the moment, but, more epic multiple day drives will start once the majority of the big jobs outside are completed
    • I hear that would involve some nice country road drives into the hills for Mark...
    • I thought I'd come back and add something I JUST learned. A Toyota LandCruiser with a 1HZ, mates perfectly with a bottle of Nulon brake fluid. As in, it perfectly screws in. Great make shift funnel when you cut the bottom of it off. This may work for your Corolla.   Unfortunately, tipping a 10L drum is much harder than a 4 to 6L bottle, and they no longer include the easy pour tap which was just perfection to use previously.  
×
×
  • Create New...