Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently a mate of mine got done by the EPA. He has a mirage which has been turbocharged and now he needs to get it back to NA... dunno exact details. However, he will go thru alot of money and anguish over this.

Planning on having my GTR worked, though the visual impact will be much less.. almost stock looking. and obviously this is very different to the mirages case but....

wat do i need to do in order to avoid any problems with the epa? is it worth getting engineers cert?

i am getting HKS GT-SS turbs... obviously hard to see and PowerFC. should i take any precautions or will it most likely be ok?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/
Share on other sites

Recently a mate of mine got done by the EPA. He has a mirage which has been turbocharged and now he needs to get it back to NA... dunno exact details. However, he will go thru alot of money and anguish over this.

Planning on having my GTR worked, though the visual impact will be much less.. almost stock looking. and obviously this is very different to the mirages case but....

wat do i need to do in order to avoid any problems with the epa? is it worth getting engineers cert?

i am getting HKS GT-SS turbs... obviously hard to see and PowerFC. should i take any precautions or will it most likely be ok?

PowerFC would be a mistake... My understanding is that the EPA looks for any changes to emmissions control devices, so the ECU is out. The fines can be quite substantial ($10K+), so it's not worth it. Now, using an R32 computer and getting it re-programmed would be a lot harder for the EPA to pick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192682
Share on other sites

Engineers wont fix it.

you need a full EPA test if you change anything that alters your emissions.

Its your gamble  :(

True, the EPA can still get you even with an engineer's certificate.

However, I would've thought, though, that programmable engine management (i.e PowerFC) would be advisable as you can lean the mixtures out so that the emissions are not too high. Wouldn't stock ecu's run the car rich, therefore have higher emissions??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192920
Share on other sites

Damn HKS34R, nice avatar ;)

While its true about programable engine management having the posibility of a cleaner tune, i think the epa's issue would be that anyone using such ECU's have other mods and thats what they dont like, let alone the fact that the ECU is a mod in itself, and dont most of them say somewhere "for race or offroad use"?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1192996
Share on other sites

is this all the same for nsw ? or is it restricted to per state ....

should we worry about ANY mods being picked up on by the epa .. wouldnt then all those ricers with hyundai excels and 4" exhausts get kicked off the roads all the time ?

being somewhat new the country, this is all of great interest to me ...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1193020
Share on other sites

You could show them your car having better emissions than standard ecu but there is nothing to stop you programming later on to be worse than standard.

But you can reprogram the stock ecu as well in many cars...

I think what Ash is saying.. is you can get a full (expensive) emissions test just for your vehicle, no matter what the mods, as long as it is below the standard levels. I guess after that, any tune would invalidate that (I think I remember hearing some people that did have the full test were required to get their ECU "locked" to the tune it was tested with). This would vary by state though.

The reason why they instantly dismiss any aftermarket ECU is that there is no standard yardstick soon as you start tampering with the factory setup. A "S-AFC" could be under, or it could be over depending on the tune.. there is no way of telling without doing the full comprehensive test.

It's :bs!: and there would be ways to come up with much quicker verification of mods vs emissions, but obviously there are reasons not to do that from higher up in government.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63371-epa/#findComment-1193601
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • You can set hard reserves on your battery system, and it can't be discharged past that.  
    • That sounds like an excellent idea. But total self-sufficiency means exactly that. You have no-one else to blame when your system faults out and you have no power for a week or two while it gets fixed. You'd have to go the whole hog and get a diesel genny and all the switchover gear, to get you through such times. And, despite the fact that over 20 years, my system has been pretty reliable**, I have seen so many inverter explosions (or less dramatic deaths), panel and roof JB fires, and so on, over that time, to know that the stuff is the same as any other bulk Chinese manufactured stuff. The failure rate is well above zero - both on the equipment and on behalf of the meth addled installation labour force. And then..... warranty and means of redress against the supplier you bought the gear from. Best I can tell is that only a handful of solar companies are still around within 5 years of starting their advertising pitch. They disappear and phoenix like crazy. So, as per 1st paragraph, I suspect the only way to is go balls deep and spend maybe 2-3 times as much as you might think, so that you have every base covered. Plus, know and understand your gear intimately, so you can diagnose problems, sort them out yourself, etc, etc. Plus, probably have to consider upgrading various parts as the years pass, to maintain compatibility with newer stuff, performance and reliability, etc, etc. Whereas, remaining attached to the grid has an ongoing cost that keeps going up even if you use bugger all power from it. But it does provide the fallback in case of the worst case with your own gear. You either pay up front or as you go, I suspect.
    • Add more solar panels to the array. Call the electricity company and tell them you're moving out... Live off grid electric wise
    • Hi Jasmine. How's the war going?
    • I'm extremely suspicious of the VPP stuff. Best I can tell, you surrender any and all control of your panels and battery to the VPP, because there's no way that anyone could write a sufficiently useful set of "rules" as to how much you would be willing to let out of your export meter at any given time. If one of your main interests is to have enough in your battery every evening to get you through the night without having to import, you could easily find yourself with nothing in your battery at the end of the day, or part way through the night, and then be paying import pricing instead of paying nothing. I cannot see how this cannot come to pass.
×
×
  • Create New...