Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cheap as in <3k

what i am trying to say is you spend 1000 doillars for example on a NA and get X kw gains

you spend the same 1000 on a turbo motor and get yourself 3 times as much gain for your buck

Get a 89 dolalr boost controller and ind it up a few PSI etc - thats NOT EXPENSIVE

good luck with the conversion mate, are you planning on doing the work yourself? i like the idea of bolting a turbo up to the RB25DE and running low boost. will still have good power off boost and be cheaper in the first place. only issue would be tuning ie what computer to use. I doubt the stock GTST ecu would work?

Do it, do it. Gatty I'm sure you'll find the tuning process a billion times better than I did, the R33 ECU just doesn't have all of the bullshit self-diagnosis the R34 has. For god sake the R34 ECU will show a fault for the stupidest reasons....it's pathetic!

After messing around with ECUs for the past year I'd say throwing the turbo ECU in and backing the timing a few degrees should be fine...looking at the diagrams for it, you should have absolutely no error codes on the thing.

Keep posting to this forum.. this is interesting.. As ive had a few friends look into converting from N/A to turbo.. one sold his car after 6 month of frustration and got a GTS-T, lost about $4000 the other mate is still looking into it..

Yeah frustration is a pain, I've had a year of it :rofl: But that's what happens when someone overseas left out loads of what they did to the car they turbocharged!!! Grrr

When the exhaust is done on my one, that's it finished :rofl:

Here are a couple of pics of what a turbo N/A look like...when I get the custom pipes done, it'll be almost impossible to tell it was N/A...only the *trained eye* will spot the variable intake, and lack of the word turbo on the engine cover ;)

engine%201.JPG

engine%202.JPG

wow - some action int he thread now :rofl:

dan your just the man i wanted to see this thread :rofl:

i will be doing the work myself - yet thats going to be a BIG challenge for me...

ECU wise probably a wolf maybe? or even another piggy back system or maybe a stock GTS-T ECU - haven't decided yet, but i'd say I will use a standard GTS-T ecu ;)

when i get all the bits i hope to get it done in a very short time frame :D

i'm liking the idea of bolt on turbo now and rb30 bottom later on...

OK some more pictures, probably helps if you stare at the engine bay to get a feel for where they are.

The first one is the oil feed, to see where this is you'll need a torch to scope around under the intake manifold.

oil%20feed.JPG

This one is looking down to where the AFM hose connects to the turbo, where the engine mount sits. The oil return was passed through the engine mount, to the turbo. The return end goes to a 90 degree tap that goes through into the sump.

oli%20return.JPG

In this picture you can see the braided oil feed hose, that goes around the back of the engine to the other side as shown in the first picture.

The water return goes to a 90 degree tap that goes into the block. The feed comes from the heater hose near the fire wall.

water%20feed-return.JPG

Hope you can make some sense of these pictures

Dan

buy a rb25det block and put it on your NA head, then buy a turbo exhaust manifold and the turbo.intercooler you will need and u can use your non turbo ecu and get it remapped. by using a det block you will be able to run normal gtst boost with out blowing your motor, the gtst block also has the oil squirters, stronger pistons and lower compression.

  • 3 weeks later...

damn, i assumed so - you get that done professionaly? you would have had to remove motor during the process?

helping a mate remove his blown turbo on his 33 the other day if the holes where there i reckon it'd be a fairly simple process and wouldn't even need to remove the motor...

Yeah had it done professionally, but they managed to leave the engine in the car, so it didn't cost as much as it was going too...don't ask me how they managed to do it though, it was in some very tight spaces!!! I was actually amazed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...