Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

are the rims polished Nismo LM GT4's?? I WANT these rims, not polished, just the normal silver ones, so if anyone has any 17" ones or knows where to get em, 1st or 2nd hand, lemme know! :D

if they're not GT4's, they are VERY similar.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63933-d-spec-drift-rims/
Share on other sites

i'm sorry Adz, i may just have to get these LM rip offs :( - I'm not too keen on the brand new idea, and finding second hand 17" Silver LM GT4's is VERY VERY VERY hard. Of course i'd love the real thing, but i don't think it's possible.

thanks for the info Rezz, and i apologies in advance if i buy a set! :D Unless you can find me some 2nd hand 17" silver LM GT4's? :D :D :D

what company makes these? is it Taiyaya? All up they are about $1,100 AUD for a set. Which is pretty good considering 18" real LM GT4's are about $1k a wheel? Was it more than that adz?

how much you reckon a good condition set of Advan Model 5's would go for?

Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurn Them Alllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ahahahahhaahah - ok then, give me $1,500 x4 or whatever you paid, and i'll go down to Evo-R (??) and pick myself up a set of real ones :D

daniel, I might beat you to it, I'm keen on gettin a set of LM ripoffs as well :D

dude, hook us up! :D Gareth there is a container arriving or leaving early november, i think it might be arriving. I'm not sure. So yeah, if you could hook us up with a set of silver ones (non-chrome) i'd be very interested. Would they fit an R34?

dear me, they are shiny http://page11.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n7192839 - too shiny if you ask me. Damn it, why does no one have any 2nd hand silver ones, or even real LM GT4's!!!! :D

gtr1.jpg

oooooo baby..... :D

different finish. It's a bad pic, but maybe you could get it finished a little different. i think there are some places that do it.

I'm pretty sure I saw that black GTR the other day - funnily enough it was when i was down at the dock visiting my own black GTR. It was a bit of a spin out.

He had silver LMGT4s and number plate was AWB.

I am going to get LMGT4s for mine. I love the stock wheels but on the GTR the offset isnt very aggressive and hence they sort of sit back in from the edge of the guards too far.

I just dont know which colour yet, all of them would look good on a black R34. White, bronze or silver????

D-Spec wheels (if you've seen them in real life) have a very special spoke design that, even though they have moderate offset (+30), they look like the spokes are dished right into the center of the wheel, almost like they have +0 offset (a la Volk TE37s for AE86).

The LM GT4s only look "+0 offset deep spoke" style when they are for GT-R offsets/widths. Usually for GTS-ts and GTS25-ts the GT4s look fairly ordinary. Don't bag me for that comment, I see GT4s ALOT and I don't fancy them so much anymore.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...