Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'm only talking of my experiences here, but ..

a. you dont need a fuel reg

You don't need a fuel regulator probably because you've got bigger injectors

He said he doesnt have the funds for them so he's going to need the FPR to bump up the fuel pressure to make 250rwKw.

Im also going down this route very soon with a 2535, standard injectors and HKS 256 EX cam

Probably would have been better with the inlet cam as well but hey, this is as far as I can go right now...

Not really interested in the injectors at the moment guys, I know you can get 240-250 out of the stock ones and i dont have a spare $700 to spend on something I dont really need.

 

So far it sound like i should go for:

 Z32 AFM, Fuel Reg & hi-flow tuned by Dave...

 

Is there anything that I have left out that I may need (excluding injectors :rofl:)

That’s the biggest understatement of the century... Theirs no point trying to up fuel pressure if your injectors can only flow stock amount.

No matter how much you change it via a FPR, It’s still only going to pump 380cc into the motor, and if you think you can get 240 - 250kw out of stock injectors go for it.

Because for the cost of $700 for an upgrade set, or for the cost of a re-build which you will be doing if you don't upgrade your injectors. I sure know which option I would go.

Theirs no cheap way when you get to that point. You can't expect to bolt on a bigger turbo, and not upgrade your fuel system. Because it just doesn't work like that.

No matter how much you change it via a FPR, It’s still only going to pump 380cc into the motor, and if you think you can get 240 - 250kw out of stock injectors go for it.

You can increase the flow of the injectors by increasing the preasure, although I wouldn't go more than 10-15% more than stock preasure. This amount might just give you what your after without having to go to 550cc's.

lol bbq melted piston 6 :) (ages ago)

as long as people don’t do wat he did.. (run mass boost for to long) in a hot climate with almost stock everything cept avcr fmic n zorst

If you call 10psi Mass boost, when then I think you’re in trouble running 14psi. As that’s the biggest contradiction, Considering your running a stock Cooler, stock fuel system, stock computer, with a rb25turbo, (On a rb20) Running 14psi....... Ohh yer did I mention the Heat that your running it in !!!

Your setting a good example, just like your comment.

With a stock internal motor you can't expect to bolt on a bigger turbo, run more boost and keep the fuel system stock, it just not reliable. Bigger turbo = More Air, More Air, Needs more Fuel.

If you keep your injectors stock gunmetal 33, and you do the turbo upgrade.

I would like to see how long your car lasts until you are up for a re-build.

Hi guys, I need to clarify a few things here;

GCG ball bearing hi flow, no problems for 250 rwkw, best I have seen is 265 rwkw at 1.5 bar.

Upping the fuel pressure at the rail increases the fuel flow through the injector, but is isn't one for one. For a 10% increase in flow you need around a 25% increase in pressure. That's a lot more pressure (48 psi compared to 38 psi) so you need to make sure your fuel fittings, hoses, filter and clamps are capable.

Personally I would never aim for more than a 10% increase in flow, so 410 cc's is about the limit. Using the rule of thumb for a 6 cylinder, that's 410 bhp (306 kw) or ~ 240 rwkw. Best I have seen was 235 rwkw. That's using cleaned injectors with the highest flowing one in #6, the next in #5 etc. In a GTST this is due to #6 being at the rear, furthest from the radiator, not much air flow, radiated heat etc. Nothing to do with differential flow in the inlet system (like a GTR).

So you need to do the numbers, 1.5 bar = 22 psi + rail pressure 48 psi = 70 psi. Minimum you need a fuel pump that can supply 410 cc X 6 X 60 = 148 litres per hour at 70 psi. An R32 GTR fuel pump (used for the 265 rwkw) will do 190 litres per hour easily, as will a Z32, at that pressure. With reference to the attached tests on the Supra pump (make sure the part number actually agrees with yours) you can see that they are extremely voltage sensitive.......

1903flowtest-supra-med.gif

At 12 volts they are below what I would consider a safe margin (155 litres per hour at 70 psi rail pressure). So if you haven't already done it, I would strongly suggest you run a dedicated supply to the pump from the battery via a relay. Use the standard wiring to switch the relay. That will get the voltage at the pump up to 13.8 volts (alternator output) and give you around 210 litres per hour, which should be more than enough.

OK on the Z32 AFM, although you might just get away with the standard R33 GTST AFM at ~240 rwkw. The Nismo "bolt on to the fuel rail" style of fuel pressure regulator will do the job for 70 psi ($149 from Nengun).

Bottom line GunMetalR33, the injectors will be the limiting factor in your plan, with around 240 rwkw being the most likely limit.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

AAHHHGGMMM knowledge flexing....

Na just jokes, thanks for the great info. What happened to the attachment???

Hi guys, I need to clarify a few things here;

GCG ball bearing hi flow, no problems for 250 rwkw, best I have seen is 265 rwkw at 1.5 bar.

Upping the fuel pressure at the rail increases the fuel flow through the injector, but is isn't one for one. For a 10% increase in flow you need around a 25% increase in pressure. That's a lot more pressure (48 psi compared to 38 psi) so you need to make sure your fuel fittings, hoses, filter and clamps are capable.

Personally I would never aim for more than a 10% increase in flow, so 410 cc's is about the limit. Using the rule of thumb for a 6 cylinder, that's 410 bhp (306 kw) or ~ 240 rwkw. Best I have seen was 235 rwkw. That's using cleaned injectors with the highest flowing one in #6, the next in #5 etc. In a GTST this is due to #6 being at the rear, furthest from the radiator, not much air flow, radiated heat etc. Nothing to do with differential flow in the inlet system (like a GTR).

So you need to do the numbers, 1.5 bar = 22 psi + rail pressure 48 psi = 70 psi. Minimum you need a fuel pump that can supply 410 cc X 6 X 60 = 148 litres per hour at 70 psi. An R32 GTR fuel pump (used for the 265 rwkw) will do 190 litres per hour easily, as will a Z32, at that pressure. With reference to the attached tests on the Supra pump (make sure the part number actually agrees with yours) you can see that they are extremely voltage sensitive.......

flowtest-supra.gif

At 12 volts they are below what I would consider a safe margin (155 litres per hour at 70 psi rail pressure). So if you haven't already done it, I would strongly suggest you run a dedicated supply to the pump from the battery via a relay. Use the standard wiring to switch the relay. That will get the voltage at the pump up to 13.8 volts (alternator output) and give you around 210 litres per hour, which should be more than enough.

OK on the Z32 AFM, although you might just get away with the standard R33 GTST AFM at ~240 rwkw. The Nismo "bolt on to the fuel rail" style of fuel pressure regulator will do the job for 70 psi ($149 from Nengun).

Bottom line GunMetalR33, the injectors will be the limiting factor in your plan, with around 240 rwkw being the most likely limit.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

I personally would not bother with the highflow. go a jap brand, when it comes to it the price difference is not that much. I bought a gt-rs for $2800 from nengun, and sold my standard turbo for $450. which ends up costing me $2350 for my new turbo. GCG have them for like $2000 and its your standard one re-done so u save few humdred $$ for what? a highflow? i just personally dont think they are as good as a jap unit, but oppinions differ.

I personally would not bother with the highflow. go a jap brand, when it comes to it the price difference is not that much. I bought a gt-rs for $2800 from nengun, and sold my standard turbo for $450. which ends up costing me $2350 for my new turbo. GCG have them for like $2000 and its your standard one re-done so u save few humdred $$ for what? a highflow? i just personally dont think they are as good as a jap unit, but oppinions differ.

I'd agree that for the few extra $$$ it is worth going the Jap brand. in the case above $350 is very little!

I personally would not bother with the highflow. go a jap brand, when it comes to it the price difference is not that much. I bought a gt-rs for $2800 from nengun, and sold my standard turbo for $450. which ends up costing me $2350 for my new turbo. GCG have them for like $2000 and its your standard one re-done so u save few humdred $$ for what? a highflow? i just personally dont think they are as good as a jap unit, but oppinions differ.
I'd agree that for the few extra $$$ it is worth going the Jap brand. in the case above $350 is very little!

So you guys just bolted the GTRS straight on, you didn't have to modify anything, buy anything extra or fabricate stuff? The GTRS fitted up exactly the same as the standard turbo? And it took you half a day to remove and replace, no special knowledge or tools required?

Then it made more power EVERYWHERE than when the engine was standard?

Then you took it out ot the drags in a full weight R34 GTT and it did an 11.9 at 120 mph?

There is more to a turbo than how much it costs on its own and the maximum power it makes at one RPM point. Personally, I take it all into consideration, look at what I expect from the car and then make a choice.

What sort of PSI are we talking to get the GCG hiFlow to produce the 240 mark you mentioned SK?

I have seen 240 rwkw at 1.2 bar, but remember boost is irrelevant, it is simply a measure of resistance to airflow. An example, the R34 GTT has cams and headwork. It makes 15 rwkw more at similar boost because the cams and headwork have removed the restriction, so it flows more air (to make more power) but the resistance (boost) is lower. I am sure the GCG ball bearing hi flow would make more than 1.5 bar if you stuck it on a restrictive/choked engine.

Guys, don't get me wrong, I am not picking on anybody or saying you have done it badly. There are more ways than one to skin this cat, I simply post up my way. That way readers can make their own choices.:)

PS; I don't place any importance in having a certain "name" brand product on my cars, I only care about how nice they drive and how fast they go. I can understand that some people want to have a "name" brand to impress people, but it's just not my thing.

lol bbq melted piston 6 :P (ages ago)

as long as people dont do wat he did.. (run mass boost for to long) in a hot climate with almost stock everything cept avcr fmic n zorst

You don't even know what boost he was running and how can you call,

Frontmount, full exhaust, pod all the usual stuff... STOCK ?

GunmetalR33,

I'd personally go bigger injector's for reliability, although you can push them to 250rwkw's as SK mentioned you have to change fuel lines and fittings etc to run that sort of pressure. You don't want a fire to break out in you'r engine bay!

I know what i'd do but its you'r decision , all i can say is you will notice the car will run, rev smoother with bigger injectors, same with bigger fuel pump.

;)

Jun

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...