Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just finished all the tests on GT4P the other day...I hate GT4P and GT license tests in general... but that's how desperate I was for a little GT4 action lol...

Know what you mean. It's a love/hate relationship for me. Ive got all golds up to S1 in GT3 including rally and most golds in GT4P. Considering there are twice more license tests in GT4 i'm going to be at it for a long time.

There is no such thing as ProII only Driving Force Pro. (there has been a false rumor getting around that there is a ProII)

If your sure there is, post a link to it?

Well im glad you got that sorted out. Phew!

Man give us non-geekheads a break, sorry i'm not as up to date as your are on all the hot rumors regarding the different versions of ps2 steering wheels.

deep down we are all "geekheads":D:D

we are not all geekheads......... hehe this is my setup for GT4, just got the driving force pro wheel from eb games as well as a capture card for the pc

p1613ty.jpg

i think i might go practice on prologue now....... :wassup:

depends on if you want force feedback or your happy with vibration only.  i like force feedback:D:D

It also has the 900 degree rotation (2 & 1/2 turning wheel) as well as a stick shift.

but the force feedback is definatly the highlight!! :wassup:

Yeah I went into EB the other day they had like three different wheel deals with GT4, one was the $300 one, can't remember second and the cheapest was a $100 wheel plus GT4 for $150 all up.

One looked tempting cos it was a multiformat (xbox & ps2) wheel and I just can't see springing $300 right now no matter how much I want a wheel...GT4 will rock wheel or not and I got stuff to do on the (real) car...

Hey with those wheels, what is it like to use on lap? Impossible? Impractical? If I got one I couldn't see myself making an elaborate setup for it or sitting at the dining table to play GT4

Driving Force Pro is a little bit more ergonomic than the Driving Force (the blue one) plus it has a lot more realistic feel to it in GT4P. For a bang for buck i would go for Driving Force, you get the feedback and stuff. It has a bug though that you can't switch gears while it is in the full lock.

Also,

2 DAYS TO GO BIATCHES!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...