Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I really feel for you r32gts as you know myself and a few othrer forum members were the victoms of GDTNO the scamming little bastardo.

Like we did you should talk to his parants about the whole thing and see if they can pay you back.

Prank needs a ip address identifyer for his server so that anyone who registers for sau,and are on a banned list are instanly found oout..

If only there was such a thing.Still there are other ways of getting on here.Like a new computer with a new ip address,friends computer etc.

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really feel for you r32gts as you know myself and a few othrer forum members were the victoms of GDTNO the scamming little bastardo.

Like we did you should talk to his parants about the whole thing and see if they can pay you back.

Prank needs a ip address identifyer for his server so that anyone who registers for sau,and are on a banned list are instanly found oout..

If only there was such a thing.Still there are other ways of getting on here.Like a new computer with a new ip address,friends computer etc.

Fatgtsr has a point.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

hope so.

he's just making it easier for everyone :)

By giving us more detail to put into the bad traders list so no-one with SAU has to deal with him again

He could have just provided false information, so that next time he signs up to rip people off, the details don't match with what's in the bad trader warning.

FATGTS-R,

I recently bought an AP PowerFC via COD.

Prior to purchase I spoke to the Post office box people who allowed me to inspect the item before paying.

After all 1k+ is a lot of money to be throwing around when you really don't know if it is indeed the correct item.

Hey there Alex...aka " doridori32" and other crap.

its Roger here aka " nismo33"...purchased the fuel pump from you not long ago...had no idea you sent me the wrong pump...so now i would like a refund.

you can have your fuel pump back and otherwise i will give your info to the police and file a report againts you.

that was a rip off mate...wasn't impress.

i just want my money back..you can have your fuel pump as that wasn't the fuel pump i paid for.

personally....i wouldn't mind dropping around to alex's joint and beating $200 worth of sard fuel regulator out of him....we'll say $1 each punch?

Seriously guys, insist of COD when purchasing. Its dead simple - just get the guy to go to the post office, and with the COD, this can be paid by the sender, or the recipient. Its not expensive either - $15-20?? very little money but piece of mind in knowing that you wont get jibbed. The post office is reasonable too - allowing you to open the package first to make sure the part you requested is in there.

maybe you could post him back a C4 mailbomb as a personal thanks for the rip off.

better yet - why doesn't everyone repost their junk mail and any other shit to alex's joint? perhaps even print outs of the forum thread in hope that his dad reads it and breaks his fkn neck for us?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...