Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could someone please explain what the differences are between the two..

Do you mean Bosch D-Jetronic vs L-Jetronic injection systems ??

D-Jetronic uses a MAP sensor to detect engine load and injectors are batch fired once per engine cycle (ie once per 2 engine revs) to give the fuel required for the next combustion cycle. Flow rate of injectors are therefore quite large. This system is found mainly on European cars of the early 70's (eg Volvo, Mercedes). Probably the first mass produced EFI system....but all analogue.

L-Jetronic uses an air flow metre (AFM), almost invariably the flap type. Injectors are batch fired twice per engine cycle (ie once per engine rev) each firing giving half the amount of fuel for the next combustion cycle. The L-Jet system is much more common than the D-Jet and pretty much the main stay of EFI systems up until the mid 80's or so when full digital systems started to take off (L-Jet is still analogue). Later versions used oxy sensors and had a form of error code read out.

A bit of trivia - 'D' is the first letter of the German word for pressure, while 'L' is the first letter of the German word for air (I think).

Hope that helps and was what you were after (there are other detail differences) - if not, sorry to waste your time :)

just a couple of questions...

Whats the map sensor, and engine mapping eg how does it work... etc etc (i know it's a noob question but I haven't read about it anywhere):

Injectors are batch fired twice per engine cycle (ie once per engine rev) each firing giving half the amount of fuel for the next combustion cycle.

what do you mean by batch fired? I guess it dosn't have anything to do with the individual cylinders firing because if cylinders fire twice per engine cycle that would make them 2stroke engines right?

Whats the map sensor, and engine mapping eg how does it work... etc etc (i know it's a noob question but I haven't read about it anywhere):

MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure sensor. In simple terms it measures vaccuum or pressure (from the turbo) in the inlet manifold - it's a measure of engine load. From this the ECU works out how long to fire the injectors to give the correct air-fuel ratio (well along with some other stuff...eg engine temp).

what do you mean by batch fired?

It means the injector are all fired together.

Basically I have heard that the HKS Fconv pro ECU can be used with either D-Jetro or L-Jetro setups. I want to know the differences between the two in detail :D

Cheers

I have never heard that terminology used together, "Jetro" is a term used by Apexi and obviously the term "FCon" is HKS. A HKS FCon can be used for AFM or MAP, most I have seen use MAP. Most cars that arrive with Fcon have them removed as they are unknown here (except for one place in Sydney). Plus they need specialist software (and interface) to tune via a laptop. They don't have a Commander like Apexi Power FC.

If you intend to get the car tuned once and never make any other mods, then you could stick with the FCon. But it is risky, what happens if its tuned on a warm day and it doesn't run right on the first cold day, or in high humidity, or in traffic with aircon on a 40 degree day. What happens if BP or Shell come out with 100 octane? What happens if you have to change something because it fails? Or want to take advantage of that cheap pairs of cam you always wanted?

:)

Bosch Automotive Electrical / Electronic systems manual (5/87) states -

Bosch K-Jetronic . Pure mechanical continuous injection system .

Bosch KE-Jetronic with electronic controls for extra functions and flexibility .

Bosch LE-Jetronic . Multi point electronic solenoid port fuel injection with vane or

flap type airflow sensing .

Bosch LU-Jetronic . As above with Lamda closed loop control (oxygen sensor) for

countries with strict emissions legislation ie USA .

Bosch L3-Jetronic . As above with ECU on air fow sensor (reduces cost of looms

and no ECU in passenger compartment) . Digital .

Bosch LH-Jetronic . Similar to last 3 but with hot wire air mass meter which

measures air mass inducted by the engine . The result of

measurement is thus independent of the air density which is

dependant upon temperature and pressure .

Bosch Motronic . this system combines both ignition and injection systems and

controls both electronically .

This covers the early Bosch injection systems .

Many feel that EFI load sensing via a hotwire mass airflow sensor gives a more accurate idea as to how much air an engine is breathing . Some prefer Manifold Absolue Pressure sensing but its a measure of pressure rather than airflow . Doing it this way requires complex temperature corrections as air temperature is directly related to air density . The way I see it to achieve a set air fuel ratio say 14.7 to 1 we need to mix 14.7 units of air by mass to one unit of fuel by mass . Another drama is competition type induction systems with one throttle per cylinder such as the GTR or GTiR etc . Getting a suitable pressure signal at low revs and not much more than small throttle openings is difficult .

To air pressure , its easy to use atmospheric pressure as a base line but lucky for us its not zero . Air pressure is generally measured in PSI-A (absolute) or PSI-G (gauge) . PSI absolute means zero is a total vacuum and anything above is positive pressure regardless of atmospheric pressure . PSI gauge assumes atmospheric pressure at sea level is ZERO , most compound boost gauges read like this . So these gauges read above and below atmospheric pressure . I find it hard to see the logic in a negative or below zero pressure but obviously once upon a time the powers that be though otherwise .

Cheers A .

Just for laughs did a search on D-Jetronic , was developed in the early 1960's and the first form of OEM EFI using some Bendix technology . The speed density system it used was very different to the Delco ones in Vomit Doors and Camiras . It had a flip flop style switching system incorporated into its soft ball sized MAP unit and fired its injectors in groups of two . The distributor had a couple of sets of points in its base as well just to confuse things . It was used in some early Mercedes Benzes Porsches and Type Three Dack Dacks (V Dubs) and other things no doubt .

I doubt very much if AP Engineering copied anything off D-Jetronic to develop D-Jetro .

Cheers A .

I doubt very much if AP Engineering copied anything off D-Jetronic to develop D-Jetro

No-one is suggesting they did.....as I said it's not relevant.

If you want to be accurate about D-Jet, it was first used on experimental cars in 1959 but didn't see line production until 1967 when it appeared on VW Type III 1600 passenger cars manufactured for the US market. It was an attempt by VW to meet ever more stringent emission standards (yes, even back then). It actually exceeded expectations plus gave improved fuel consumption and driveability.

I have a copy of the research paper by the then Chieff Engineer of automotive products at Robert Bosch describing system development, etc

FWIW I fitted the D-Jet system from a Volvo 164E to a C210 Skyline running an L28 in the late seventies. It ran reliably and well for a few years until I got an R30. Certainly a vast improvement over the carb'd crap available at the time.

This is getting waaaay OT.

Sorry to gtr90 for hijacking the thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...