Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could someone please explain what the differences are between the two..

Do you mean Bosch D-Jetronic vs L-Jetronic injection systems ??

D-Jetronic uses a MAP sensor to detect engine load and injectors are batch fired once per engine cycle (ie once per 2 engine revs) to give the fuel required for the next combustion cycle. Flow rate of injectors are therefore quite large. This system is found mainly on European cars of the early 70's (eg Volvo, Mercedes). Probably the first mass produced EFI system....but all analogue.

L-Jetronic uses an air flow metre (AFM), almost invariably the flap type. Injectors are batch fired twice per engine cycle (ie once per engine rev) each firing giving half the amount of fuel for the next combustion cycle. The L-Jet system is much more common than the D-Jet and pretty much the main stay of EFI systems up until the mid 80's or so when full digital systems started to take off (L-Jet is still analogue). Later versions used oxy sensors and had a form of error code read out.

A bit of trivia - 'D' is the first letter of the German word for pressure, while 'L' is the first letter of the German word for air (I think).

Hope that helps and was what you were after (there are other detail differences) - if not, sorry to waste your time :)

just a couple of questions...

Whats the map sensor, and engine mapping eg how does it work... etc etc (i know it's a noob question but I haven't read about it anywhere):

Injectors are batch fired twice per engine cycle (ie once per engine rev) each firing giving half the amount of fuel for the next combustion cycle.

what do you mean by batch fired? I guess it dosn't have anything to do with the individual cylinders firing because if cylinders fire twice per engine cycle that would make them 2stroke engines right?

Whats the map sensor, and engine mapping eg how does it work... etc etc (i know it's a noob question but I haven't read about it anywhere):

MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure sensor. In simple terms it measures vaccuum or pressure (from the turbo) in the inlet manifold - it's a measure of engine load. From this the ECU works out how long to fire the injectors to give the correct air-fuel ratio (well along with some other stuff...eg engine temp).

what do you mean by batch fired?

It means the injector are all fired together.

Basically I have heard that the HKS Fconv pro ECU can be used with either D-Jetro or L-Jetro setups. I want to know the differences between the two in detail :D

Cheers

I have never heard that terminology used together, "Jetro" is a term used by Apexi and obviously the term "FCon" is HKS. A HKS FCon can be used for AFM or MAP, most I have seen use MAP. Most cars that arrive with Fcon have them removed as they are unknown here (except for one place in Sydney). Plus they need specialist software (and interface) to tune via a laptop. They don't have a Commander like Apexi Power FC.

If you intend to get the car tuned once and never make any other mods, then you could stick with the FCon. But it is risky, what happens if its tuned on a warm day and it doesn't run right on the first cold day, or in high humidity, or in traffic with aircon on a 40 degree day. What happens if BP or Shell come out with 100 octane? What happens if you have to change something because it fails? Or want to take advantage of that cheap pairs of cam you always wanted?

:)

Bosch Automotive Electrical / Electronic systems manual (5/87) states -

Bosch K-Jetronic . Pure mechanical continuous injection system .

Bosch KE-Jetronic with electronic controls for extra functions and flexibility .

Bosch LE-Jetronic . Multi point electronic solenoid port fuel injection with vane or

flap type airflow sensing .

Bosch LU-Jetronic . As above with Lamda closed loop control (oxygen sensor) for

countries with strict emissions legislation ie USA .

Bosch L3-Jetronic . As above with ECU on air fow sensor (reduces cost of looms

and no ECU in passenger compartment) . Digital .

Bosch LH-Jetronic . Similar to last 3 but with hot wire air mass meter which

measures air mass inducted by the engine . The result of

measurement is thus independent of the air density which is

dependant upon temperature and pressure .

Bosch Motronic . this system combines both ignition and injection systems and

controls both electronically .

This covers the early Bosch injection systems .

Many feel that EFI load sensing via a hotwire mass airflow sensor gives a more accurate idea as to how much air an engine is breathing . Some prefer Manifold Absolue Pressure sensing but its a measure of pressure rather than airflow . Doing it this way requires complex temperature corrections as air temperature is directly related to air density . The way I see it to achieve a set air fuel ratio say 14.7 to 1 we need to mix 14.7 units of air by mass to one unit of fuel by mass . Another drama is competition type induction systems with one throttle per cylinder such as the GTR or GTiR etc . Getting a suitable pressure signal at low revs and not much more than small throttle openings is difficult .

To air pressure , its easy to use atmospheric pressure as a base line but lucky for us its not zero . Air pressure is generally measured in PSI-A (absolute) or PSI-G (gauge) . PSI absolute means zero is a total vacuum and anything above is positive pressure regardless of atmospheric pressure . PSI gauge assumes atmospheric pressure at sea level is ZERO , most compound boost gauges read like this . So these gauges read above and below atmospheric pressure . I find it hard to see the logic in a negative or below zero pressure but obviously once upon a time the powers that be though otherwise .

Cheers A .

Just for laughs did a search on D-Jetronic , was developed in the early 1960's and the first form of OEM EFI using some Bendix technology . The speed density system it used was very different to the Delco ones in Vomit Doors and Camiras . It had a flip flop style switching system incorporated into its soft ball sized MAP unit and fired its injectors in groups of two . The distributor had a couple of sets of points in its base as well just to confuse things . It was used in some early Mercedes Benzes Porsches and Type Three Dack Dacks (V Dubs) and other things no doubt .

I doubt very much if AP Engineering copied anything off D-Jetronic to develop D-Jetro .

Cheers A .

I doubt very much if AP Engineering copied anything off D-Jetronic to develop D-Jetro

No-one is suggesting they did.....as I said it's not relevant.

If you want to be accurate about D-Jet, it was first used on experimental cars in 1959 but didn't see line production until 1967 when it appeared on VW Type III 1600 passenger cars manufactured for the US market. It was an attempt by VW to meet ever more stringent emission standards (yes, even back then). It actually exceeded expectations plus gave improved fuel consumption and driveability.

I have a copy of the research paper by the then Chieff Engineer of automotive products at Robert Bosch describing system development, etc

FWIW I fitted the D-Jet system from a Volvo 164E to a C210 Skyline running an L28 in the late seventies. It ran reliably and well for a few years until I got an R30. Certainly a vast improvement over the carb'd crap available at the time.

This is getting waaaay OT.

Sorry to gtr90 for hijacking the thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...