Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any skyline is part of a long line of family cars - they (for the most part) just happen to be very well equipped 'family' cars. I wouldn't be using the 'family car' theory as any part of a slanging match. It's a bit of a moot point anyway - it's an argument that doesn't go anywhere, or prove anything.

About all you can criticise the falcons for is weight (and build quality). 'Different' handling is a by-product of that weight - they certainly can get around the track fast enough, but won't have the 'feel' that many appreciate.

4L + big factory turbo will always = very impressive power. Luckily for the skyline boys, it seems that the xr6 can't get the power down to the ground particularly well (seems to be a common ford trait).

The biggest plus for the ford is that you can buy it easily at any ford dealership, brand spanking new, and with a worthwhile warranty (how often you need to use said warranty is another matter altogether...).

I wouldn't buy one, but I won't knock their abilities either.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wasn't knocking thier abilities, just commenting on each cars strengthes/purposes.

If your requirment for a car is to carry the kids and wife with a caravan on a holiday, then a falcon/commodore would be a good choice

If your requirment for a car is to squirt around a race track, then a GTR/skyline would be a good choice.

ah boy another can of worms.

All I can compare is the difference I had in the 33GTST with say my father in laws 2002 SS.

With the Skyline there is a feeling of being integrated with the car. The SS on the other hand kind of feels like a powerful sled or something the way it travels around bends and such feels like its sliding all the time.

Heh if i go for a drive now in a newish com or falc i start feeling sick due to the way those cars handle inertia etc - too used to sporty suspension. Guess I was just wondering if XR6t was similar in those respects.

PS I use Firefox and it crashed for the first time yesterday. Reinstall did the jobbie.

I wasn't knocking thier abilities, just commenting on each cars strengthes/purposes.

If your requirment for a car is to carry the kids and wife with a caravan on a holiday, then a falcon/commodore would be a good choice

If your requirment for a car is to squirt around a race track, then a GTR/skyline would be a good choice.

Ha ha ha - not knocking the GTR's, but look at how many have had fatal engine damage recently from a fang on the race track.... (remember, I own a GTR....)

Ha ha ha - not knocking the GTR's, but look at how many have had fatal engine damage recently from a fang on the race track....  (remember, I own a GTR....)

None down here in vic (yet) :rofl: *touch wood*

I wonder how an XR8/XR6T would go running similar lap times as the GTR's down here, would it last ?

You can get the Falcons to handle better by spending $3-$4K. But thats a lot of money compared to the fact that you dont need to spend much on a Skyline.

yeah, for 2.5 k my mates cars handles much better than stock, but that still doesn't make up for the weight penalty that the ford carries.

and tell me why the xr6t's have the airbox on the opposite side to the turbo??? Just leads to more piping...bad design

anyway, guys at work have the xr6t on a lease and they've all had the following problems:

1) intercooler hoses blowing off

2) Engine stalling when stopping suddenly

3) Tailshaft problems

4) Coolant leaks

5) Brake shudder

6) Steering rack issues

There are about 10 guys in my team and 4 of them have xr6t's and every single one of them experienced the above mentioned problems.

There was a comparison done on one of the latest Serious Performance? vids from memory, of a 4 dour gtst vs xr6t.

With Ian Luff involved in the xr6t and some other driver in the skyline.

First off they took a tiptronic R34 auto, it got whopped big time, not to mention the handling was like a boat of a 4 door.

Then they took out a modified 4 door with suspension upgrade and it kept up with the xr6t and handled better. (but the xr6t was still stock as a rock)

Im sure some of you have seen the segment?

and tell me why the xr6t's have the airbox on the opposite side to the turbo??? Just leads to more piping...bad design

anyway, guys at work have the xr6t on a lease and they've all had the following problems:

1) intercooler hoses blowing off

2) Engine stalling when stopping suddenly

3) Tailshaft problems

4) Coolant leaks

5) Brake shudder

6) Steering rack issues

There are about 10 guys in my team and 4 of them have xr6t's and every single one of them experienced the above mentioned problems.

didnt you read the special features part of your owners manual, you paid for all those problems, you and 90 percent of the other people foolish enough to buy a new falcon

just keep booking it back into your delearship and it will all get fixed under waranty sooner or later

There was a comparison done on one of the latest Serious Performance? vids from memory, of a 4 dour gtst vs xr6t.

 

 With Ian Luff involved in the xr6t and some other driver in the skyline.

 

 First off they took a tiptronic R34 auto, it got whopped big time, not to mention the handling was like a boat of a 4 door.

 

Then they took out a modified 4 door with suspension upgrade and it kept up with the xr6t and handled better. (but the xr6t was still stock as a rock)

 

 Im sure some of you have seen the segment?

So an R34 4 door handles like a boat? How is it different from a 2 door suspension wise?

I have stock suspension. Check my signature.

I was under the impression that the 4 door has softer suspension for the occupants, more of a people mover and looking at the footage on the video, it must be, never seen a 2 door go over on two wheels and stuff.

Ill find out what dvd it was, i borrowed them off a mate.

Its worth a look for sure, if you really want to see the xr6t vs 4 door skyline part.

Someone here must have seen it and can also comment?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...