Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got the rally one also from Scheizze, who is apparently Online Now and from Russia :confused: also with no posts!!!

"Last Activity: Today 01:11 PM

Private Messaging @ 01:11 PM " LOL

Subject: The Ultimate Rally - Summer 2006

I got the ultimate rally too

Today, 02:10 PM Warn ChandraHens · View ChandraHens's Warnings

ChandraHens

Registered User

Location: Germany

Join Date: Feb 2005

Trader Rating: (0)

The Ultimate Rally - Summer 2006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To the best drivers on earth:

The Ultimate Rally is the world championship of street racing.

7 days, 3000 miles, 200mph and US$ 2 million prize money.

If you are a fast driver with a powerful car & balls of steel

checkout our official website: http://www.ultimate-rally.com

The Ultimate Rally is limited to 100 cars and the entry fee

is US$ 30,000. See our terms & conditions and apply here:

http://www.ultimate-rally.com/application.html

Join our official Forums at http://board.ultimate-rally.com

and learn more about this next generation Cannonball Run.

Greetings,

Kimble

Founder of the Ultimate Rally.

www.kimble.org

Dunno about you, but that advertising worked on me!

I've wired my $30,000 entry fee into Kimble's Cayman Islands account and I'll be hiring a quad turbo Noble M12 for the race!

GO GO GO!!!!

Bulletin Message

Your administrator has disabled private messaging.

- does this mean, i cant even check my new Pm's :( Can mr admin please let me check em haha. i dont post here much at all.. Or tell me when its gonna be all fixed etc.

Thanks, Steve.

Hehe... believe it or not most of us can't read links directed to your Inbox :P

p.s. I got the spam as well... $30k entry... hmmm errrr not this financial year.

yeah I know mate - just testing the security out :)

actually I was just wanting to post the subject and cbf removing the link from it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...