Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest two.06l
NXTIME, I remember now you've got the twin 2835 high mounts damn for someone that asks a lot of questions you don't reveal much about yourself hahaha or is it your checking out the competition first :(

What gearbox you runing mate?

Tell us the specs mate, we're all friends here

hey ya big potato..funny thing is, i know of a guy that pretty much copied our build sheet. Was chatting to him on the weekend and is wondering why they arent making the power with the same tuner and dyno..

to pinch a line from Toohey's limited....

"It's all good mate"

I just want to wait until the damn car is actually up and running. It's been over 2 years and alot of bad luck and $$$ spent. Hoping to have it ready by April 9th. ;)

It's a stock(ish) R32 GTS-t anyway...

well, that is what the sticker on the bootlid says. ;)

Mate don't talk to me about builds its twice as hard when you start from scratch :( 14 months and counting

Its ok though we'd still like the specs its sort of like I'll show you mine if you show me yours but your not playing :)

I just want to wait until the damn car is actually up and running. It's been over 2 years and alot of bad luck and $$$ spent. Hoping to have it ready by April 9th. :(

It's a stock(ish) R32 GTS-t anyway...

well, that is what the sticker on the bootlid says. :)

Funny thing about buying modded imports is that it's all well and good when they are running, but since they are often near their deathbeds they turn into hell expensive projects... or left motionless in the garage. But it still can work out cheaper than building it locally.

Quite hard to hide the flared GT-R guards and call it a GTS, I doubt many people will get away with it.

Good luck with it, I'm sure it will be somewhat competitive on the local scene.

Good luck with it, I'm sure it will be somewhat competitive on the local scene.

Not very hard considering the local scen fu(king SUCKS! AWD racing RWD is BULL$HIT!

Sports Compact Racing is garbage while:

RWD races AWD in the same series

and

DYO racing features minimum weights...

Adrian

Guest two.06l
Not very hard considering the local scen fu(king SUCKS!  AWD racing RWD is BULL$HIT!

Sports Compact Racing is garbage while:

RWD races AWD in the same series

and

DYO racing features minimum weights...

Adrian

Guess whos 20lb over the minimum for TWO power adders.....????

Funny thing about buying modded imports is that it's all well and good when they are running, but since they are often near their deathbeds they turn into hell expensive projects... or left motionless in the garage. But it still can work out cheaper than building it locally.

Quite hard to hide the flared GT-R guards and call it a GTS, I doubt many people will get away with it. 

Good luck with it, I'm sure it will be somewhat competitive on the local scene.

I know, I know. I added up the costs of building it from scratch and didn't like the idea of another mortgage.

At least it will still fool all the wankers who won't know the difference. Plus, too many GTS-T owners have GT-R'd their cars, so I am getting one back by GTS-t'ing mine :( I even considered fitting a GTS-t wing! lol But have just gone for the wingless rear.

Thanks, I hope I have some better luck in the coming weeks.

PS, I'll play - PM's sent.

Not very hard considering the local scen fu(king SUCKS!  AWD racing RWD is BULL$HIT!

Sports Compact Racing is garbage while:

RWD races AWD in the same series

and

DYO racing features minimum weights...

Adrian

Couldn't agree with you more. But untill there are much bigger numbers, the AWD v RWD categories are here to stay. DYO with minimum weights should be gone soon enough.

Not very hard considering the local scen fu(king SUCKS!  AWD racing RWD is BULL$HIT!

Sports Compact Racing is garbage while:

RWD races AWD in the same series

and

DYO racing features minimum weights...

Adrian

It's all irrelevant considering the whole Sport Compact rules are now DYO. There's no motivation to build a quick car conforming to the rulebook when a stock auto can sweep the podium.

Just looking at the American scene, where it is still a heads up series, Supras are quicker than 4WD competitors. The added weight and resistance of 4WD isn't as great an advantage as you would think.

On the street it's a different matter :(

DYO featuring minimum weights is irrelevant while S.C. racing is DYO? WTF? I don't care that there are no fast 4WD's in the USA - doesn't affect me.

Lets get a subscribed field of RWD cars and then bin these cheaterer fu(ks in GTR's !!! :( lol

Adrian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...