Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest two.06l

ok boys this is Stace here

Enough whoring of my thread!! Lets talk about my beautiful car again, I was really enjoying it!

BTW adrian, I just saw an ad for "Power cruise" on the TV, and I'm quite concerned, dont really think it's my cup of tea! Or, then again maybe I should register for the jelly wrestling.

heres the torque graph

torque_graph.JPG

synergy 8000 and octane booster

new boost controller and race fuel tuning friday week

will post results.

Thanks for the reply, that's some awesome torque (800nm).

Well done, bring on the 500awkw with racing fuel.

:D:rant::):)

Car looks like a million bucks! *thumbs up*

I love the work and attention to detail, and I hope that after I pour money and time into mine that it will be as clean and tidy. :D

I see you've decided to make it look like a gst-t with a gtr body kit. Because as we all know, 98% of GTR's without the badge are actually hyped up 16 year old kids in their body kitted gts-t's. :rant:

Keep up the good work.

Finally TWO.06L is back in action, new look, new wheels, new paint, new brakes and with a new TRUST 4" exhaust and 405 awkw, a new attitude. Its been very hard to have her off the road but the final result is more than worth it. Hope you like it.  

9881gtr5.JPG

Congratulations S & P! Now that's gotta be one of the sexiest sights around:is there anything better than a iron fist wrapped in a velvet glove?! It's only my opinion(which I often get told to shove sideways somewhere dark :rofl: ),but I reckon that THIS is how a GT-R should look! I've had my baby up on blocks for 5 weeks,and I'm going slightly :looney: waiting for my suspension to come back-you must've been going absolutely :bananaman :crazy: :gaga: :freak: waiting for this to happen... Worth the wait,I say!! TWO.06L lives again!!

Guest two.06l
I see you've decided to make it look like a gst-t with a gtr body kit. Because as we all know, 98% of GTR's without the badge are actually hyped up 16 year old kids in their body kitted gts-t's. :rofl:

Making the car look like a 16yr olds gts-t was the last thing we wanted. It looks like a tough GTR minus the badging. Nothing more, nothing less.

Stace - looks good :(  I think the front ride height needs to come down a bit though (or mayby mine is just too low! :( ) I'm not sold on the clear indicators...

That is some pretty impressive power you are producing!

Car looks awsome!

incredible power

Wheels really set it off they looked a bit like TE37's because of the colour!

agree not a fan of those indicators reckon the standard look heaps better well on my grey gtr they do anyway

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...