Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, its finialy time where ive bitten the dust and decided its time to give up the old l20et and go with the rb20det.

I Would like to get a database together from all the information you guys have learnt yourselfs doing this swap. Which i will greatly need.

What is needed for the wiring system, i know the engine side of the loom is simple. But Ecu power. and Fuse box.... ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68739-rb20det-engine-conversion/
Share on other sites

i have changed over to an rb20det in my 66 prince skyline gt.... wot is the platform you are starting with( just the engine or complete package?) can take photos of wiring on mine and can give you general idea of wot to hook up if ya wont?/.... just let me know........

if ya wont to look at my cdonversion, half the photots are posted on my web page... addresss in my signature.....

its going to be going into a R30 coupe, its my daily driver. so wont be doing the swap just yet.

Ive currently only just got the motor, which is in parts. Going to rebuild it competly, new bearings ect.

Trying to find a GTS- GTS-t loom, and then a ecu. hopefully that would help me,

Im planing on using the l20et gear box, according to justec it bolts right onto a Rb bell housing.

Yes the L20 will bolt to the RB20 bell housing , you will need the larger countershaft bearing (std on N/A VL and Series 3 Bluebird) and the matching bearing cover/input shaft support . I think the L20 box has small style selector shafts so RB bellhousing may need to be bushed to support them .

  • 10 months later...

Can anyone tell me if bellhousings are easy to remove? Will the rb20det bellhousing fit straight onto the l20et gearbox?

What driveshaft needs to be used in a r30 that has had a rb20det and rb20det gearbox into it?

im running complete silvertop motor and box.... stronnger and will bolts straight up to orginal mount

and the L series tail shft yoke is the same spline as the rb box......

The RB Gearbox output shaft is different, hence rsx's tailshaft mod, a new yoke to suit the RB box is required, but Stewart Wilkins here in NSW is currently modifying an L series front housing for me, so that I can have an RB20DET box behind my L20/28ET ha ha.

The RB main bearing is much bigger than the L series, I'm not sure about the reverse, but RB boxes can be made to go on L6 engines relatively easily.

I'll stay tuned here as I'm very interested in pics of engine and gearbox mounts for RB's in R30's . Pics of the wiring would be great .

Cheers  A .

A,

Jaustech in Adelaide claim the L6 crossmember is used in R30's, with RB engine mounts, but the gearbox rear mount has to be extended backwards.

D

Hi all , don't want to lock swords with you Dennis but its the Turbo RB25 box that needs the different yoke because of its larger mainshaft and splines . Jacko and I found this out years ago when we were playing with Bluebird/DR30 and RB20DET boxes . The input and output shaft splines are the same both ends for all three as is the approximate length of these boxes . We know this because the last box he built me for the FJ Bluebird had a full set of RB20DET guts inside FJ DR30 casings which externally are same dimensions as L20B Bluebird box - except different bolt pattern for FJ block .

I will never do this again because there are many differences between early and late selector mechanisms which can be hybridised but the shift quality suffers .

To get an RB20DET box behind an L series is straightfoward , basically ditch the RB bellhousing and bore the lower or layshaft bearing hole in the L series bellhousing to suit the larger RB style bearing outer race . You need to use the RB's larger front bearing cover/input gear support because it suits the larger lower bearing . Now it will bolt together using std bits as per normal .

From what we can see the RB71C is the last and strongest evolution of the 71 series gearboxes . It has the wide gears , the larger syncro hubs/baulk rings ie 1-2 and 3-4 . It has the later shift mechanism and all large size selector shafts . Nissan would have gone beyond these to support higher torque loadings because there comes a time when the only way to strengthen a box is to use larger diametre gears/shafts/bearings hence the larger box used behind RB25/26 turbo and N/A/turbo VG30 four cam engines . The VL-T also has a variation with slightly wider ratios which is good because you can buy a yoke to suit these big boxes that uses rebuildable uni joints .

Cheers A .

Hi all , don't want to lock swords with you Dennis but its the Turbo RB25 box that needs the different yoke because of its larger mainshaft and splines . Jacko and I found this out years ago when we were playing with Bluebird/DR30 and RB20DET boxes . The input and output shaft splines are the same both ends for all three as is the approximate length of these boxes . We know this because the last box he built me for the FJ Bluebird had a full set of RB20DET guts inside FJ DR30 casings which externally are same dimensions as L20B Bluebird box - except different bolt pattern for FJ block .

I will never do this again because there are many differences between early and late selector mechanisms which can be hybridised but the shift quality suffers .

To get an RB20DET box behind an L series is straightfoward , basically ditch the RB bellhousing and bore the lower or layshaft bearing hole in the L series bellhousing to suit the larger RB style bearing outer race . You need to use the RB's larger front bearing cover/input gear support because it suits the larger lower bearing . Now it will bolt together using std bits as per normal .

From what we can see the RB71C is the last and strongest evolution of the 71 series gearboxes . It has the wide gears , the larger syncro hubs/baulk rings ie 1-2 and 3-4 . It has the later shift mechanism and all large size selector shafts . Nissan would have gone beyond these to support higher torque loadings because there comes a time when the only way to strengthen a box is to use larger diametre gears/shafts/bearings hence the larger box used behind RB25/26 turbo and N/A/turbo VG30 four cam engines . The VL-T also has a variation with slightly wider ratios which is good because you can buy a yoke to suit these big boxes that uses rebuildable uni joints .

Cheers  A .

AS usual your a wealth of information, and thanks, as ya just saved me a few bucks buying a yoke/tailshaft for mine when I swap the RB20DET box into my PNV.

The only thing I might have a problem with is the length, cause I am told the L20ET uses a stumpy short gearbox, as opposed to the RB being quite longish.

Cheers, D

So with this swap.. You can use a rb20det hear box on any l motor, with simple mods? What would become with the Driveshaft. ?

My l20et box is getting a bit "solid" in shifting, id like to go with a rb20det gear box

It sounds like the HR30's use a similar/same box as the MR30's . Could be a simple cheap fix if you found one for the right price .

Cheers A .

Forgot to add , if you change that lower front bearing to the smaller earlier type the "L" bellhousing should go straight on . I think my hybrid FJ/RB20 box was like that after its innitial build . It was in and out 2 or 3 times trying to get it right .

For the 130 KW you may not need the hassles of the big front bearing conversion , FJ20ET's made 143/147 Kw (early/late) and they did not get the big lower front bearing and don't seem to eat them in std or mild state of tune .

Bye .

For Dennis , there is a chance that the wide gear set with the big syncro hub/ring/fork 1-2 (basically FJT set) may fit the "stubbie box" , the main changes were the rear extention housing and mainshaft length (obviously) selector rods as well . Provided the mainshaft gear bearing journals are the same it may be possible to get tougher bits onto the "stubbie box" mainshaft and if she's worth it even the larger lower front bearing .

It would at least look original !

Cheers A .

For Dennis , there is a chance that the wide gear set with the big syncro hub/ring/fork 1-2 (basically FJT set) may fit the "stubbie box" , the main changes were the rear extention housing and mainshaft length (obviously) selector rods as well . Provided the mainshaft gear bearing journals are the same it may be possible to get tougher bits onto the "stubbie box" mainshaft and if she's worth it even the larger lower front bearing .

It would at least look original !

Cheers  A .

Thanks A,

I have a spare L20ET box now, picked one up at Newcastle off ebay for $125.00, plus I have the US T5 box and an R31 RB20DET box.

I might have some fun trying to destroy some gearboxes lol

SWR has my L series front housing doing the mods for it to bolt onto the RB box at present.

Cheers,

D

Ca18/Sr20 boxes can be used with a L series bellhousing aswell, same mods when doing the Rb20 box to L bellhousing (enlarged hole and bearing).

Ca/sr and possibly Rb20( not sure tho) are about 25mm longer than a long style datto box (Fj20 and z18et box's too).

I have a ca18det box on a L series bell here that i might sell due to not using it in my 1600.

Another tip when puttin a L bellhousing onto a other box, is too warch the selectors and make sure they dont move, if they do you will only be able to select certan gears, and this isnt much fun after youve put the box in the car...

(i know someone who did it).

Hope this is sorta on topic and can be usefull?\

Cheers...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
    • It's a place for non car talk. There's whoretown which is general shit talking. But also other threads coving all sorts of stuff(a lot still semi car related)
    • Looked it up. It sounds so expensive lmao I'd rather not. Awwwww but I just love that sound
    • If you want the screaming "weeeee" sound, just let the gasket between the exhaust manifold and the turbo break a little. It'll go "weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" everytime its on boost...
×
×
  • Create New...