Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car's idle has been pretty poor. Revs quite high when cold, and hunts continually when hot and when cold - even worse when the air con is switched on. It used to idle fine, this happened all of a sudden.

I have a power fc fitted, but it seems to be working properly. I thought it might be the O2 sensor as it doesn't have a constant voltage output, but ruled that out as the hunting will cause the O2 to fluctuate???

The car runs fine at cruise, and under power.

Has anyone had similar problems, or have any ideas as to what may be the cause.

PLEASE HELP

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/
Share on other sites

Steve,

The best way to diagnose the problem is on a dyno, I know it cost's money but compared to the hassle of going through all the possibilities it will be worth it.

Other than that it could be plugs, injectors, O2 sensor, temperature sensor, fuel pump etc. The list of possibilities is quite long, a dyno will narrow that down very quickly and then you can have a happy car again.

See'ya

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/#findComment-102447
Share on other sites

Thanks heaps for your replies:)

GTS-t VSPEC:

I will be dyno tuning the car again soon, just waiting for the Z32 AFM. Can you recommend anyone in Perth?

fatz:

don't have a lightened flywheel YET - thanks for the tip though as this is a future planned mod.

blind_elk:

What and where is the AAC valve, and is there a specific way to clean it?:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/#findComment-102722
Share on other sites

Steve,

There are quite a few good tuners in Perth, I tend to use either Steve at SST or Barry from Barries Dyno. How much is the Z32 AFM costing? I run a map sensor, therefore no restriction from the AFM, does the PowerFC have map sensor capability? There is also a VPC (vane pressure converter) from HKS or someone that provides the equivalent electrical signal without the restriction. It's just for the cost of the Z32 AFM I think there are better alternatives, but that's my opinion.

I would have thought the hunting is a fuel related problem. Good luck with the retune.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/#findComment-102729
Share on other sites

GTS-t VSPEC:

Thanks again, the Z32 is costing $270Aus which isn't a bad price. The reason I don't want to go map is that it seems to raise some problems with fuel usage at idle and cruise and from what I heard takes a bit to set up properly, with the added advantage that upgrading the turbo doesn't require a complete retune. I may be way off the mark, but I was under the impression that MAF is alot more street friendly than MAP. The Power FC has an option for a Z32, so its a pretty easy install and then a dyno tune, and I believe not compatible with MAP?

RAIDER:

Cheers for the input, I'll give it a go and see what happens. Fingers crossed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/#findComment-102938
Share on other sites

At that price for the Z32 you'd be crazy not to buy it. Yes in general I would agree with most of the fuel issues relating to the MAP, but most decent tuners can set it up no problems. It depends how far you want to go with your setup, as even the Z32 will run out of range with a decent turbo.

Seeing as the power fc takes the Z32 directly then it is a good choice, I hope it turns out well once you've had it retuned.

See'ya :burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6923-idle-problems/#findComment-103143
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...