Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Would drilling and tapping slightly thicker cradle bolts make the rb30 cradle any stronger?

the tourqe that is avaliable from the rb30/26 as compared to the rb26 motor is that you will make torque and power earlier on in the rev range so there is no need for it to rev as hard as a rb26.

And the rb25 has less capacity and is a step down from the rb26/30 or rb26 all together in terms of the power that is possible with the stock crank and cradle support.

I am still a neewbie when it comes building motors,so take it easy. :P

That's an RB30 block with the standard cradle......

RB30_Block_1.JPG

:D

Saw you racing on TV at Wakefield. Pretty cool class by the looks of it. On the track you looked a bit radical though. What the hell's going on with your car?

Would drilling and tapping slightly thicker cradle bolts make the rb30 cradle any stronger?

the tourqe that is avaliable from the rb30/26 as compared to the rb26 motor is that you will make torque and power earlier on in the rev range so there is no need for it to rev as hard as a rb26.

And the rb25 has less capacity and is a step down from the rb26/30 or rb26 all together in terms of the power that is possible with the stock crank and cradle support.

I am still a neewbie when it comes building motors,so take it easy. :devil:

There is not enough width in the main bearing saddle to handle larger diameter bolts. We use ARP studs, stronger than bolts.:D

Hi guyz !!! Do you know wat's the best turbo setup for RB26/30 for achieving 800hp ?  

 

I am planning to get T04Z ball bearing... Any advise or recommendation ?

T04Z is the way to go

nd4spd is back ... twin t04z

50km old engine run in tune no timing or anything

799.9 rwhp!!

ALOT more to come from it

BK are you basing your opinions on solid facts or what you have read Martin Donnan believes in HPI???!!!!! I have developed a system to adapt the gtr sump to the rb30 motor that if anything would be stronger than the standard way it is done on an rb26. On my own engine I am also running vacuum pump, a custom made girdle strengthner( retaining the stock girdle) and ati are making me a custom billet steel 4 ring harmonic damper.

I hope to achieve out of my own build around 900hp at the engine rev it to about 8200rpm and do it for a while. Nizpro have made well over 1000hp on there rb30/36 but it threw a rod through the block so they only advertsied to what they believed was the highest level safely and that was around 1000hp!!! After having talked with JUN and Veilside believe me any RB making over 1000hp has its fair share of problems, while rb30s have a major harmonic vibration at around 7.500RPM the Rb26 has the same at 9.200RPM and the same factors have to be faced in overcoming this and holding the engine together bearing wise once you start to rev the thing to make power.... You have to remember a rb30 at 7.5K is equal to the volumetric displacement of air as a Rb26 at 9K.... The problems the japs have with making that much power out rb26's is the revs place unbelievable loads on the valvetrain, veilside rebuild everything in the head every time they give there cars with over a 1000hp a full power run....

Mate it can be done but without sound engineering and mechanical knowledge it is really going to cost you an arm and a leg and maybe more, the trick will be finding someone to do it....

This might be stupid and just obvious but with high power engines, if you don't drive them hard, won't they last almost as long as a stock motor?

How's this situation:

Say you're going on a long drive - just take it real easy....... granny driving it

The rest of the time, well..... like you usually do :) or should be doing.

Well after talk to Keir Wilson at drag combat in Perth about std component strength and other issues. The biggest problem you'll will face is block strength in either the std rb26 or rb30 as i would think them quiet similar in strength. The quote that KW told me was that the std rb26 will break about 800hp (and even suggested not to go over 750hp if you wanting it reliable) And before you guys jump up and down yes they might more hp for a while but the thread was about reliable 1000hp and i think KW opinion should hold a bit of weight due to his expirence with this sort of motor.

So if your serious about a reliable big hp motor you will want to look at either GTR N1 GT block (think walled) or maybe the OS Giken 3 litre small motor.

my 2c

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...