Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's not like idle because it's got load. A bigger load. While I have no scientific basis I'm almost sure that the load caused by too highly gearing an engine and making it struggle is worse than using the car as it was designed to run.

PS. love the new part of your sig, looks sweet.

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok so how is this 'load' physically hurting the engine... name parts exactly...

Trying to ride a mountain bike up a hill in a higher gear doesn’t actually physically damage me, I'm simply not able to do the same thing 'pedal legs' as fast as if in a lower gear, no damage, just reduced speed / power / torque.  

So now we come back to an engine, how is an engine different at lower speed as it is at higher RPMs. *pistons, crankshaft, cams, all move the same still, just different speed depending on RPMs*.  Each piston ignites creating x amount of torque at the given RPM.  Now once the RPM is low enough & cannot create enough torque to move the car in the higher gear how is this actually damaging the engine.  Isn’t the engine really just doing the same thing as it is at idle RPM,  the internals are still all moving the same BUT the only difference at that same low RPM a lot more Air & Fuel is being injected to try & get the car to accelerate at that low RPM.  

This is my understanding of an engine & trying to get some explanation why low RPM in high gear is actually physically damaging / harmful to your engine, I heard someone say something about Oil before? Is oil the final factor? But at the moment with my limited understanding of engines I cannot see why an open full throttle at low RPMs is bad. Please correct / enlighten me.

I think the oil issue is oil starvation at high load and low rpm can cause the engine harm. And the car at idle doing 1400rpm and on load at 1400rpm are 2 very different things

I think the oil issue is oil starvation at high load and low rpm can cause the engine harm. And the car at idle doing 1400rpm and on load at 1400rpm are 2 very different things

Ok so lets name what's physically going on differently at 1400 RPM no load & 1400 RPM Full load.

1400 RPM *in Neutral*

Throttle slightly open *around 4%

Minimal fuel being injected

Minimal air being inducted

Exhaust note very quiet *because not much air being passed through engine & out exhaust valves.

*Oil, fill blank here, what’s going on with oil.

1400 RPM *in 5th gear*

Throttle wide open *80 - 100%*

Extra fuel being injected to create a more powerful bang

Extra air being mixed with fuel to create more powerful bang

Exhaust note louder / droned *because a much larger amount of air is being passed through engine out of a still slow 1400 RPM rotating exhaust cam.

*Oil, fill blank here, what’s going on with oil.

I think people are thinking because the engine gets such a low deep / drone exhaust note in that situation that it's gota be bad.

Now I don’t actually know much about how oil lubrication is applied inside an engine but if somebody would like to fill in the blanks for the two examples above I believe it should be the final factor determining whether driving at low RPM in high gear with high load is physically damaging your motor or not, so we're really just about to set this story straight, just need the final oil question answered.

I would have thought the same amount of oil would be being applied at 1400 RPM regardless of load, & that oil is applied at higher amounts in relation to RPM, & if it does apply more oil when the AFM detects more air going in then great. As lanc3 said, “Wouldn't it be common sense to know that forcing movement at a low force wouldn't do much”. Yes… regardless of air / fuel, at such a low RPM how could it be hurting the engine.

 

Throw it in the highest gear, if you are accelerating enough to labour (vibrate) the motor then select a lower gear.

Yep! the lowest rpm I'll do driving *with my car & engine* is about 1500 RPM... But if I had a real torque’y longer stroke diesel engine it'd probably be 1000 RPM. Hell my dads m8s had an SV300 5.7 V8. You could put that thing in 6th gear, foot off the pedal & it had so much low down torque it would cruze at 80km/h at its idle RPM. & I bet if you dropped the RPM lower than the idle RPM but you had Full throttle you'd still be able to drive along at say 70km/h but in reality you just wouldn’t bother because you’ve got no power left to accelerate, you'd just cruze at 2000 RPM in a lower gear with a slightly open throttle with room to accelerate.

bah, people worry too much. :rofl:

 

Throw it in the highest gear, if you are accelerating enough to labour (vibrate) the motor then select a lower gear.

The virbation happens when the engine is in an unbalanced state and for those that work with rotating mechanical equipment know vibration is not a good thing as it causes to stress to all linked components and damage.

geno8r

You will get your answers if you consult a thermo dynamics and fluid dynamics material.

The virbation happens when the engine is in an unbalanced state and for those that work with rotating mechanical equipment know vibration is not a good thing as it causes to stress to all linked components and damage.

geno8r

You will get your answers if you consult a thermo dynamics and fluid dynamics material.

Yeah I think we've solved this one anyway... *IMHO*

YES YOU CAN drive at low RPM in high gears & not do damage to your engine, BUT once your engine starts vibrating change gears because thats when you will start doing damage.

:rofl:

as some people have stated, i think the issue is more to do with the engine than the gearbox (just they might get the feedback from engine strain thru gearbox)

the main issue is that oil pressure is dependant on rpm - ull get roughly same oil pressure at 1400rpm with no load as u get with load. low load with low oil pressure isnt too much, but low oil pressure with high load and the engine may not be able to get sufficient oil to deal with the higher strain on certain parts of the engine

i think the biggest misconception that leads people to shift early is fuel consumption. what isnt as obvious is that if ur cruising, it doesnt make much difference to fuel consumption whether u are in 5 gear with 40% throttle, or 4th gear with 15% throttle - u have to have roughly the same power to keep u at a given speed. fuel consumption isnt just dependant on revs, but most obviously air flow - u might actually get worse fuel consumption given that the engine isnt at its optimal rpm (highest torque removing boost factors) - ur engine needs a bit more air/throttle to get a given amount of power in a higher gear than a lower gear as it isnt running as efficiently.

i can't believe so many of you drive in 5th at only 50 or 60kmh!! It just feels wrong!

i usually change at about 3000rpm and only use 5th when I get to 90-100kmh!

if i had to sit in an 80 zone for a while i'd probably whack it in 5th, but if that dropped to a 70 zone I'd have it back in 4th...

AMEN

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...