Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dear friends

I need some advice regarding the HKS GT2530 turbo.

My current setup is as follows---

fuel system: Stock fuel pump

Stock injectors

Stock fuel pressure regulator

Splitfire coils

Platinum spark plugs regapped at 0.9mm

Induction: Stock afm

HKS airpod

600x300x100 FMIC

GFB bleed valve (at stock boost)

Drivetrain: Xtreme heavy duty clutch

exhaust system: HKS 3' dump pipe and front pipe

3' high flow cat

5Zigen 3' cat back with 5' muffler tip

Engine management: Stock ECU

I am currently on a tight budget. However, I previously bought a HKS 2530 kit with actuator and have it lying around in my room. I have been itching to bolt it on my car.

In about 3 months time when I will have the money, I am planning to install a Z32 afm, GTR fuel pump, Greddy Profec B spec 2 boost controller, Apexi Power FC.

The thing is......NOW, I want to install the turbo so i will not have it lying around and taking up space. i can then sell my stock turbo to make some cash. However, this turbo install will be done without the power FC ,Z32, boost control, fuel pump and fpr. I will then be running stock boost on the HKS turbo for 3 months till I can upgrade the rest.

Tell me what you think......will it work out.....Really need advice!

Cheers,

Your fren

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71119-need-help-with-mods/
Share on other sites

get the powerfc, z32, fuel pump, afm, boost controller (a real one) at the same time

it will cost you more to keep going back and getting it tuned and fitted each time

the gt2530 is pretty small and your paying for the hks brand label. you could get a bigger garrett for similar price. also stock clutch will be useless for a 2530, slip city. the stock clutch is average aroudn 200rwkw which you should crank with the 2530. the 2530 and the hks 25 series have been superceeded by the new hks pro range such as the hks gt-ss and hks gt-rs if you wanna stay with hks label. hks gt-rs on rb25 should net you around 260rwkw fuilly tuned. but youll need injectors as well. stock injectors start maxing out about 180rwkw. then it becomes unsafe. having said that answer your original question

>> However, as I am under tight financial constrains and still want to change my turbo badly!!!

turbo is generally the last thing to upgrade as all the stock components get maxed out as soon as you go over the stock turbo power levels

>> I was thinking of bolting on a T3 flanged HKS GT2530 onto my turboback zorst to replace the stock turbo.

what size exhaust is it? hiflow cat? do u have a 3" dump and front pipe? by turboback i hope you mean dump/front 3" hiflow cat 3" and then 3" from there onwards. 2530 will bolt on to your stock stuff and you can swap actuators so minimum boost is 0.50bar. however your fuel pump, afm, injectors, clutch etc will be at their max capcity.

>>I will then have enough money for a Power FC, Fuel pump, Z32 sfm and tuning.

you can do this, look into hks-gtrs or a garrest gt28 (thats what the gt-rs is but without the hks price and label attached).

get the powerfc, z32, fuel pump, afm, boost controller (a real one) at the same time

it will cost you more to keep going back and getting it tuned and fitted each time

the gt2530 is pretty small and your paying for the hks brand label. you could get a bigger garrett for similar price. also stock clutch will be useless for a 2530, slip city. the stock clutch is average aroudn 200rwkw which you should crank with the 2530. the 2530 and the hks 25 series have been superceeded by the new hks pro range such as the hks gt-ss and hks gt-rs if you wanna stay with hks label. hks gt-rs on rb25 should net you around 260rwkw fuilly tuned. but youll need injectors as well. stock injectors start maxing out about 180rwkw. then it becomes unsafe. having said that answer your original question

 

>> However, as I am under tight financial constrains and still want to change my turbo badly!!!

turbo is generally the last thing to upgrade as all the stock components get maxed out as soon as you go over the stock turbo power levels

 

>> I was thinking of bolting on a T3 flanged HKS GT2530 onto my turboback zorst to replace the stock turbo.  

what size exhaust is it? hiflow cat? do u have a 3" dump and front pipe? by turboback i hope you mean dump/front 3" hiflow cat 3" and then 3" from there onwards. 2530 will bolt on to your stock stuff and you can swap actuators so minimum boost is 0.50bar. however your fuel pump, afm, injectors, clutch etc will be at their max capcity.  

 

>>I will then have enough money for a Power FC, Fuel pump, Z32 sfm and tuning.

you can do this, look into hks-gtrs or a garrest gt28 (thats what the gt-rs is but without the hks price and label attached).

opps for got to mention....I do have an Xtreme heavy duty clutch. And Yes my exhaust is a 5Zigen 3 inch catback, with 3 inch high flow cat, 3inch HKS frontpipe and dump pipe and 5' muffler tip(for the look :D ) .

I have seen peopel on this forum managing 220 rwkw with the HKS 2530 with stock injectors. So i think it should be ok.

I actually have a GTR fuel pump and Z32 afm lying around in my room. However, i thought that these should only be used CONCURRENTLY with a power FC as the stock ECU will not be able to manage these.

Can someone please advice.

Cheers

Dan

Just upgrade your fuel pump and you could still pump out some decent figures even without z32 afm, injectors, or PFC. Your current setup plus fuel pump should get you over 230rwkw without any hassles.

Installing the fuel pump will be fine without needing management.

Just upgrade your fuel pump and you could still pump out some decent figures even without z32 afm, injectors, or PFC. Your current setup plus fuel pump should get you over 230rwkw without any hassles.  

Installing the fuel pump will be fine without needing management.

Are you saying I can go ahead with the turbo install?? But just install fuel pump as well??

Thanks

Dan

Hang on there.....That means installing a HKS 2530 with fuel pump and without the power FC???

U guys sure thats ok??

YES, 2530 + GTR fuel pump + Nismo bolt on fuel pressure regulator (Nengun $150) = OK.

BUT (there is always a but), check it carefully on the dyno, adjust the fuel pressure to keep the A/F ratios OK and listen for any knock. Adjust the boost and the base ignition timing (with the CAS) to achieve the best COMPROMISE.

DON'T bolt it on and go for a thrash.

Please post up the results, to prove it works.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...