Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Having a conversation today about anti lag setups with a mate. Now from my basic understanding, anit lag set ups for launch control work on the principle of a rich mixture combined with retarded ignition timing with your right foot planted to bring the turbo up on boost.

Now this is just a theory only, so anybody with greater knowledge can pick the holes in it but take the RB25 engine with its stock ecu for example and its "rich and retard" strategy when the afm volts get close to 5.0v.

The electrical wizards would know how to implement this but lets say you could make the afm see 4.5-5.0 volts with a switch or button hence putting the ecu in its rich and retard mode, you could then press this button, plant right foot and see a few pounds of boost pressure while stationary.

Obviously, it would depend on how rich and retarded the ecu made things and how much is required for anti lag but couldnt this work?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/
Share on other sites

I've only ever heard of mechanical antilag systems where the turbo is actually driven mechanically like a supercharger to get it spinning decently before you sink your foot into the accelerator pedal.

What you are saying certainly sounds interesting though

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1317656
Share on other sites

I've only ever heard of mechanical antilag systems where the turbo is actually driven mechanically like a supercharger to get it spinning decently before you sink your foot into the accelerator pedal.

... and where did you hear that?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1318509
Share on other sites

"if u wanna completely shorten the life span of your turbo and your engine by dropping timing and dumping fuel into your engine to make the bang bigger........ go for it i'll help you pick up the pieces."

Thanks for that champ. I am well aware of the detrimental effects on manifolds, turbines and exhaust valves when used constantly but thats not what I asked.

Thanks for your input anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1318615
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

              Having a conversation today about anti lag setups with a mate. Now from my basic understanding, anit lag set ups for launch control work on the principle of a rich mixture combined with retarded ignition timing with your right foot planted to bring the turbo up on boost.

Now this is just a theory only, so anybody with greater knowledge can pick the holes in it but take the RB25 engine with its stock ecu for example and its "rich and retard" strategy when the afm volts get close to 5.0v.

The electrical wizards would know how to implement this but lets say you could make the afm see 4.5-5.0 volts with a switch or button hence putting the ecu in its rich and retard mode, you could then press this button, plant right foot and see a few pounds of boost pressure while stationary.

Obviously, it would depend on how rich and retarded the ecu made things and how much is required for anti lag but couldnt this work?

Very creative thinking, what were you drinking?

In R&R protection, the rich is ~10% and the retard ~5 degrees. For any decent anti lag you would need ~30% rich and ~25 degrees retard. That way you would have sufficient unburnt fuel and the exhaust valve would be open when the plug fires.

Launch Control and Anti Lag are 2 different things. Launch control is for limiting the wheelspin.

;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1319174
Share on other sites

While on this topic, does anyone actually run antilag on their skylines? Im seeing alot of WRX owners putting in Link ECU's with rotational idle/antilag setups and having very good reliability with them (granted, careful monitoring of the compulsary EGT gauge is required) with next to no mechanical failures after 10,000km of driving using antilag often.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1319323
Share on other sites

"Very creative thinking, what were you drinking?

In R&R protection, the rich is ~10% and the retard ~5 degrees. For any decent anti lag you would need ~30% rich and ~25 degrees retard. That way you would have sufficient unburnt fuel and the exhaust valve would be open when the plug fires.

Launch Control and Anti Lag are 2 different things. Launch control is for limiting the wheelspin."

Ha Ha, yes this was a turps enriched idea.

Thanks for the reply which shows the ecus strategy aint enough to do anything except make a horrible noise.

I understand the difference between launch control and anti lag. I guess for a cruder term I should have said "launch anti lag" as this theory wont work on the run so to speak.

Thanks for the input.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1319719
Share on other sites

"Very creative thinking, what were you drinking?

In R&R protection, the rich is ~10% and the retard ~5 degrees. For any decent anti lag you would need ~30% rich and ~25 degrees retard. That way you would have sufficient unburnt fuel and the exhaust valve would be open when the plug fires.

Launch Control and Anti Lag are 2 different things. Launch control is for limiting the wheelspin."

Ha Ha, yes this was a turps enriched idea.

Thanks for the reply which shows the ecus strategy aint enough to do anything except make a horrible noise.

I understand the difference between launch control and anti lag. I guess for a cruder term I should have said "launch anti lag" as this theory wont work on the run so to speak.

Thanks for the input.

i use launch control and antilag system on my gtr r32 and have had a very good run and result so far, i can get between 6 to 8 psi on launch. i do not have rotational idle though but can use that later on if using it for moretrack days, but i need to go single throttle body for that.

also as far as killing engines that depends more on the tuners ability, i have worked with many evo's and a few subie's running very aggressive anti lag settings and 40 percent throttle openings at idle (ecu misfires engine to bring it idle) and they will run a season with these engines.

there are quite a few ways you can have effective anti lag, rich unburnt fuel in the

manifold with hight exhaust temperatures and then adding oxygen creates great impellor drive. i was lucky enough to go for a drive in a wrc car in perth a few years ago and that car was producing 25 psi before dropping the clutch!!!

lots of good theories made whilst drinking, lol

cheers russell

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71455-could-this-work/#findComment-1319855
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...