Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have read hundreds of threads about whether an rb25 turbo on an rb20 is a good upgrade or not.

I have an r32 and it seems relatively responsive, still on stock boost, but the midrange seems shit and just revs out with no real power. I need to get it tuned and i have a 3" front and dump pipe and hi flow cat to join onto my old 3" cat back system.

The other thing i read was that if you put on an rb25 turbo they get very fuelly, so i was wondering if you got it tuned after if it would fix this problem.

basically i want a daily that i can put my foot down on the odd occasion and feel it kick me back in my chair and beat commodore assholes ha ha!

any help would be good cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71750-rb25turbo-on-rb20-q/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I am not sure I understand the question, but I will have a go......

The RB25DET turbo produces 10% more airlfow at 7 psi, than the RB20DET turbo does at 10 psi. So if you bolt on an RB25DET turbo and use the RB25DET wastegate actuator you will get 7 psi and about 10% more power. However if you use the RB20DET wastegate actuator on the RB25DET turbo it will produce 10 psi and you will get 25% more power.

That is provided you have the support parts (intercooler and exhaust) in place to handle the increased airflow.

If you really want to get the best from the increased airflow you really need to tune it. R32GTST's have an easily chipable ECU. Either that or an SAFC (or equivalent) will do a reasonable job of removing the exccessive richness that the standard ECU provides whenever the airflow is increased over standard. There is another 15% more power to be had from simple tuning.

That's more than enough to give a 255kw Commondoor a thorough thrashing.

Hope that answered your question:cheers:

Hmmm, very impressive Ronin. We have same mods but the cam gears.

How much difference do they make on a RB20. Did you do a before and after power run?

You are running a bit lean there, the power must of came down a bit once the fuel pump was changed. I had 137 rwkw but was running flat 14 AFR and after the fuel pump change it went down to 130 but very rich. The car was still pretty stock then. :D

fark ...

my r32 with stock turbo only pulled 135.5 rwkw on standard boost .. with the only mods ..

hks filter,

hks full exhaust,

standard copper ngk plugs (non iridium)

............ now that i got the fmic and new bov ...will i get more power increase??

also i have the r33 stock turbs as well but not fitted yet and i dont know if this is worth the hassle of doing without causing strain on the engine ..???

also could i boost more if i used the r33 turbo but using the r32 actuator?? will it cause damage to the turbo / engine?? and how much boost could i run? and wot power figures should i expect?

cheers

With a fmic + bov + r33 turbo, id get it tuned then u cud run probably as much as u wanted, but id say to keep it safe keep it around 1bar for racing and just normal say 10psi for daily driving! Yes the r32 actuator goes onto the r33 turbo no problems aswell.

  • 2 weeks later...

Actuator regulates the boost level, (ie rb25 actuator = stock 7psi, rb20 actuator = stock 10psi)

rb25 turbo is just bigger than the rb20 turbo really.. series 1 r33 turbos are the strongest (but usually are older remember). Actuators generally come with the turbo, if not put ur rb20 actuator on there (or maybe do that anyway...)

rb25 turbo = $400 (+ install.. $100-200)

FMIC (inc install) = $700-1000

So your looking $1500ish for it all done, if your exhaust is done ull notice one hell of an improvement :)

Actually i wouldnt run too much boost with the rb25 turbos. S2's have a plastic compressor wheel, and both have ceramic exhaust wheels, so its possible to drop the wheels off still. I was running 16psi constantly with my S2. Before i had it tuned, and with a small boost leak which lost a lot of bottom end i still ran a 13.0 @105mph with a 2.1 60ft on crappy tyres. That was in a 180sx, but a R32 gts-t isnt that much heavier, so you can beat most commodores if thats what your worried about. One of the biggest differences was getting it tuned, top end was a little better, but the most noticable was normal driving and the mid-range... fuel ecomonmy was much better also. As someone said before, your clutch will go quickly, mine lasted about a week

Actuator regulates the boost level, (ie rb25 actuator = stock 7psi, rb20 actuator = stock 10psi)

rb25 turbo is just bigger than the rb20 turbo really.. series 1 r33 turbos are the strongest (but usually are older remember). Actuators generally come with the turbo, if not put ur rb20 actuator on there (or maybe do that anyway...)

rb25 turbo = $400 (+ install.. $100-200)

FMIC (inc install) = $700-1000

So your looking $1500ish for it all done, if your exhaust is done ull notice one hell of an improvement :)

Series 1 turbos are not really any stronger as both s1 and s2 have ceramic turbine wheels which is the weekest part of both turbos. The S2 has a plastic compressor wheel which gives better responce.

Is it possible to put a t28bb onto an rb20det?

If so, would it be better than the rb25turbo?

Sorry, i must be a dumbass.. i still dont really understand the role of the actuator.. i understand that it regulates boost.. but i dont understand how the rb25 one is better than the rb20 one. How do they differ?

Is it possible to put a t28bb onto an rb20det?

If so, would it be better than the rb25turbo?

Sorry, i must be a dumbass.. i still dont really understand the role of the actuator.. i understand that it regulates boost.. but i dont understand how the rb25 one is better than the rb20 one. How do they differ?

A t28 smaller than the turbo you have already got.

Its not a mater of one actuator being better than another. is all the actator does its push the wastgate open once a certain amount of boost is reached. An rb25 actator is designed to open when it sees 5psi where as a rb20 actuator will open when it sees 10psi.

cheers

Hmmm, very impressive Ronin. We have same mods but the cam gears.  

How much difference do they make on a RB20. Did you do a before and after power run?

You are running a bit lean there, the power must of came down a bit once the fuel pump was changed. I had 137 rwkw but was running flat 14 AFR and after the fuel pump change it went down to 130 but very rich. The car was still pretty stock then.    :O

I'm fairly sure you want to run a 12:1 AFR

putting a T28 from a S14-S15 on a RB20 would be useless exercise.

it will cost more to fabricate a new flange for your manifold and I'm not so sure if would actually be called an UPGRADE.

actuator.

the RB20's don't have a boost controler at all.

the factory boost setting of 10psi is set that way due to the spring that is in the actuators diaphram (that round part at the front)

that spring is hard enough to keep the wastegate closed enough to provide the engine with 10psi of boost.

The Rb25's have a solenoid that controls boost. this solenoid is controlled by the ECU.

so the actuator diaphram has a spring in it that is weaker than the RB20 one.

the spring alone can only hold 7psi.. and the ecu/solenoid combo work together to provide more if needed.

so when people upgrade their RB20 turbo to an RB25 turbo, because their stock engine doesn't have a boost controller, they use the RB20 actuator.

this means that they can still get 10psi with no other boost mods on the new bigger RB25 turbo.

as Sydney kid said earlier, the RB25 turbo will flow (meaning produce) 10% more at stock 7 psi than the RB20 turbo does at 10 psi.

so even if you use the Rb25 turbo and it's own actuator, at 7psi you will have more power than with the rb20 turbo at 10psi.

but use the rb20 actuator on the Rb25 turbo so you have 10 psi on that as well and you end up with a 25% increase in power/flow at same boost on the new turbo.

does that help?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...