Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I have a found a skyline that I like but want to get a compression test done it before I get it. Can anyone tell me the readings that it should give back so I know if it is decent please?

The car is a 1995 Series 1.5 R33 GTST which is as far as I can see, standard.

Thanks in advance :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72305-compression-test/
Share on other sites

Hay dude not to sure what the compression ratios on the skyline are but i know that most normal cars. come out of factory at like between 150 to 160 psi depending on engine capacity etc.

I know with SR20 180sx anywhere over 140psi is good

but the important thing to take not on compression is that they are all similar.

e.g

140 139 140 142

its bad to have inconsitancy in cylinders

e.g

135 140 145 129

just as an example some one please correct me if iam wrong. :(

hope that helps you out ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72305-compression-test/#findComment-1336589
Share on other sites

140psi with a variance of less than 15% is considered good. consistency being more important than the compression value as the compression value does vary according to a number of factors (where it's done, altitude, air temp...). try to make sure the values are a close as possible. The closer they are the lower the risk of your engine blowing up or something.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72305-compression-test/#findComment-1336909
Share on other sites

Do both a compressiontest and a Leak down test. (also known as a wet and dry compression test)

The leakdown test will indicate the condition of the head (because the oil should help seal the rings) and the difference between the two will give an indication of the cylinder and rings.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72305-compression-test/#findComment-1338411
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. Just jumped online today. Currently in the UK and not had Internet access for a few days. I will make a note of those figures back in oz and take them to the test with me.

Many thanks for the replies though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72305-compression-test/#findComment-1343504
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...