Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Took the new car to the local dyno workshop and had it tested for hp -psi- and fuel ratios and considering the car is near stock for engine mods I was most impressed it only has a HKs exhaust from the cat back and a panel filter so the average hp was 204hp atw and the air fuel rating was about .7 which is fairly rich and the car was running on stock psi of 7psi of boost, overal I am very pleased with the result...

Next step I would be guessing is to try and locate a HKs dump pipe from the turbo and a big flow cat convertor (having problems trying to locate the dump any ideas) and then some sort of air fuel controller most here seem to use the Apexi range bu I have since found out that there are 2 types to get not sure as to which one will be best suited for me I am only wanting to avhieve about 250hp also looking at fmic

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72527-near-stock-r33-204hp/
Share on other sites

250rwhp is well within reachable relms :P

Dump pipe....even an X-Force 1

Apexi SAFC

Boost controller..maybe run 10psi

& your there!

Even without the SAFC , you could run a few more psi safely as your on the rich side anyway. for about 220rwhp

You might want to have a real close look at an EMS stinger ecu laced in instead of SAFC , it is more cost but also gives you ignition control & would be handy for future mods :(

Cheers

Troy Rep.

Took the new car to the local dyno workshop and had it tested for hp -psi- and fuel ratios and considering the car is near stock for engine mods I was most impressed it only has a HKs exhaust from the cat back and a panel filter so the average hp was 204hp atw and the air fuel rating was about .7 which is fairly rich and the car was running on stock psi of 7psi of boost, overal I am very pleased with the result...

Next step I would be guessing is to try and locate a HKs dump pipe from the turbo and a big flow cat convertor (having problems trying to locate the dump any ideas) and then some sort of air fuel controller most here seem to use the Apexi range bu I have since found out that there are 2 types to get not sure as to which one will be best suited for me I am only wanting to avhieve about 250hp also looking at fmic

wat year is ur car bro? i got a 94 gtst and last time i dynoed it, all i had was 3in cat back, pod and bov and i got 223hp atw, running on standard boost. every1 thought it was pretty good for what it got. but since then got a huge fmic and will be boosted pretty soon, can't wait to get her on the dyno again...

I just went to my local Exhaust shop (proper guy, not a Midas etc) and said "I want a 3" front/dump/cat". The next day a custom front/dump (1 piece) and custom 3" Cat was fitted. It gave me around 13-15hp and drove so much better.

An Exhaust Cam Gear (about $170 delivered from Japan) will give you another 13-15hp and their you have your 250hp with no aftermarket management at all for just another $1,000 total.

The skyline is a late 1994

I thought about the EMS... but I think it is like a full on computor to replace the stock one which I am hesitant about at the moment also I am not sure as to specifics with the computors hardware eg. if the car stock ecu is a 16bit processor and a EMS is only a 8bit then there is no huge advantage... I have been down that track before with computors.. I think I need to be honest with myself as to how much h.p I am really wanting and how much I am prepared to pay for it ( and not just in $$).... I will probably end up just getting a air/fuel, but hey who knows they say a female is allowed to change her mind so I think I will just keep on reading and see what I like, the other thing I have to be mindfull of is having someone local that can tune the things as I have not got a clue...

George spoke to me about the dump that you are referring to and it sounds interesting just have to get rid of the crappy cassette player that is in the car at the moment so money will be spent there first then in about a months time will start modding the motor

For management, have a look at the Greddy E-manage, basic form does AFM intercept, same as SAFC, but for a little more you can get full ignition and injector control = full management.

205 is good, shows all is as it should be especially with 7 AFRs? this does seem a bit high, has it had the fuel pump done? should probably be getting more than 7psi boost too. Front/dump and cat are good ideas for next upgrade.

Oh, and if you are looking for 250rwkw, there is a guy selling a complete upgrade for $4k changeover with stock parts - FMIC, HKS turbo, injectors, fuel pump etc. Check the for sale, it would be an excellent cost effective way to make the car sing

Have previously used a GReddy E manage and was very good it helped out in increasing the Lancer power by 70% in N/A form but not sure if the GReddy and profec unit will be able to get rid of the speed limiter on the car were as the Power FC will be able to get that sorted

What I meant was with the piggy back style comps is that you have to match them up as you want them to work faster or at least the same speed as the factory unit as far as recieving air intake signals and processing them to the ignition/injection... if the factory unit is faster than the piggy back then processing delays means that you won't be getting the possible result .... but hey what would I know that is just my thoughts on after market comps ;)

the PFC is starting to look a winner so far as it will remove the 180klm speed limit, give better tuning/economy and can be tuned here local... now all I have to do is try and work out which model R33 it is that I have if it is a series 1, 1.5, it is deffinately not the 2...

which brings me to another interesting item on the rego papers the car says it is a 1995 model but on the plates inside the engine bay it says 11/94 but I think the bodyshape is very much like the S2 ?

I think I saw somewhere on the site were you can punch in model numbers and up will come details from the factory as to what your car is will try and find that to get more accurate details

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I can confirm the TPS is at 100%.... I can confirm when we installed the TB and setup the cable that the TB was indeed fully open at max pedal travel.. the same 'curve' (WRT MAP vs MAP) existed with the previous setup/TB/manifold as well... No, we did not do a run with no intake connected. I would love to go back in time to do such a run to rule out the intake. It would have also been good to do a run with the airbox lid off. There's a test there where increased IAT vs more available air could be a positive tradeoff. I remember taking the lid off my R34 Turbo setup back in the day and noticing a monster increase, even if IAT's did go up. Could be similar. Hard to test unless I find a very deserted road. 
    • That's actually encouraging to be honest. my motor was rebuild many years ago but it's probably done less than 30,000kms and fucc all limiter or drift, majority street / drag / roll racing. It'll be fine 💪🏼 I don't even have lines or a can for the cam breathers installed yet, there is zero oil residue or splatter on or around them, it drives beautifully so it seems healthy. Just a ticky lifter, yet they're almost brand new oem genuine Nissan and haven't done many kms at all...
    • Have you confirmed the throttle body goes to WOT (and stays there) during the run?
    • I'm having a problem. I think it was mentioned above somewhere but can't see it.  I'm stuck in the cycle of, sand, filler, low spot again, put filler, sand, low spot again, now i put filler again and a thicker portion which seems to have helped but I got low spots in other areas. In the image. Circled in red thats where the original low spot was and the shape is the same as the red out line. I've more or less fixed that (still low spot up the top but now I have low spots where the green circled part is.  Is likely the issue that I didn't start with a course sand paper? I sanded the filler with 240 to reduce the risk of not going to far but maybe the issue is that I'm only taking off enough material to remove some of the filler but not the high spots. I now started sanding with 120 and I think I'm seeing a difference. I did fix one dent the other 2 are f**ked and seems like I made another low spot which is indicated by the furthest green circle on the left handside. Any thoughts and solutions?   Also second image. All of these rock chips, can they be filled in with primer or do i need to fill them all with filler/putty? So many rock chips on mine lol.
    • Well, I had an Edward Lee's special edition odo windback car/motor with a RB25DET S2 and I put down 372kW with a good amount of track abuse for 1.5 years before the ring lands decided it didn't want to stick around anymore 🥲 But probably didn't help I kept on smashing try limiter on the track and a few skid pans.
×
×
  • Create New...