Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Do you want to be able to estimate (for any car):

1) 60ft time

2) 200ft time

3) 1/4 mile time

4) 1/4 mile speed

5) Wheel spin / traction graphs

6) Most efficient shift points for best ET or best terminal speed.

7) Accleleration graphs

8) Distasnce v time

9) Gradient charts

10) and see what effect varying hundreds of vehicle parameters has on all the above.

and more...

Then take a look at the Excel dyno (excell file) that can be downloaded in the following location.

http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/exceldyno/

It is a really cool excell file based on visual basic macros that allows you to enter data about a car and accuratly estimate heaps of performance parameters. Inputs include, engine dyno data, car parameters (CD, weight..etc), tyre setup and more. It allows you to set shift points or have it calculate the most efficient points.

All credit for its creation goes to Wez, a mate form work. He is a mechanical engineer and has had a fair bit of experence playing around with cars - he also seems to have a lot of spare time :P He has set up a Yahoo group for all things Excel dyno, if your interested take a look.

It has been tested with a number of different cars and it has proven to return supprisingly accurate results.

Of most intrest to people on this forum would be the R32 GTR data that is already entered in the program - this data was based on another workmates car and gives very accurate results when tested at the drags. Just enter your dyno chart and car details and you can start dropping those 1/4 times.

You can always add any car that is not already in the program as long as you know all the parameters.

Here is a list of car/bike data that is already entered in the database:

93 MR2 Turbo

95 200SX SE-R

Ford Falcon AUIII

Ford Telstar 92,95

MX6 - Gen II V6

Subaru WRX

VW Baja

VW drag manx

R32 GTR

Suzuki DL650

Suzuki Hayabusa

It is all free but if you want to give Wez cash I'm sure he will not refuse:) just email him on the address at the website above.

Ray Hall also has a similar thing.....

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

:)

Except that is more a rule of thumb than any sort of remotely accurate calculation.

If people want to find car specs and send them to me then I will post a new version of the sheet with the new cars up on the net.

The cars that are in there are just a few that I had some good data for so entered to check the accuracy of everything. Finding the aero data is the hardest.

Hey Wez, did not take you long to find the thread!

Ray Hall also has a similar thing.....

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

Like Wez said, his program is in another ballpark.

I thought I'd post up the calculated best shift points for a R32 GTR, that should get things going:

For best km/h: (this gives 11.155 @ 202.7km/h)

RPM GEAR km/h

4000 stall speed 36

8500 first 77

8200 second 124.2

8010 third 179

8020 fourth 234

8500 fifth 330

For best ET: (this gives 11.144 @ 201.8 km/h)

RPM GEAR km/h

4000 stall speed 36

8500 (redline) first 77

8500 (redline) second 128.8

8500 (redline) third 190

8500 (redline) fourth 248

8500 (redline) fifth 330

Here is a bit of an explination of why the shift points are different when chasing high trap speeds or Low ET's (from the Excell dyno)

These shift points will give you the max terminal speed for the 1/4 mile. These points are essentially where the torque curves cross each other on the Traction chart. Note these points are not always exactly right as the wind slows the vehicle during gear shift making the best shift point estimation more difficult.

However, to achieve the best ET you generally need to change gears a little later. This is because shifting later means you are going faster for the during of the shift time. This means more distance will be covered. The optimum shift point is when the advantage of shifting later if offset by the loss of being too far past where the torque curves cross. These points are easily found by trial and error. Start with the best shift points for terminal speed and increase the shift rpm from there. For most engines the best ET will be achieved by revving to redline.

Well when the car had the 291HP dyno chart it ran the quarter and ran an 11.9. The Excel Dyno predicts that run perfectly.

With the extra 85 wheel hp it should easily push the car into the low 11's. I can't remember if he got a time slip before that engine spat the ceramic turbines through the engine.

I had a quick look - R32 GTR with 375RWHP running 11.1@125mph? i doubt it...

Does that mean you entered your car data? Is that what the excell sheet returned?

Well when the car had the 291HP dyno chart it ran the quarter and ran an 11.9. The Excel Dyno predicts that run perfectly.  

With the extra 85 wheel hp it should easily push the car into the low 11's. I can't remember if he got a time slip before that engine spat the ceramic turbines through the engine.

220rwkw (291rwhp) ran an 11.9? what mph? that must be a low dyno reading, what boost was he running?

Ferni,

That was my car. I'm pretty sure I have told you about it before.

When my car arrived from Japan it made 217 rwkw. That was on a dyno dynamics dyno (non shootout mode). I ran an 11.99 @ 115.4 mph at our drag strip here in Townsville.

I have been involved in the development of excel dyno and I can say that it is very accurate, as long as you give it accurate data. It's in a league of its own compared to most other programs out there.

I will write more later when I have more time...

Hey Gary,

Didn't know you had a 32 GTR last time I was up on site, prolly a good thing, I would have spent more time talking about cars than getting the full "QNI experence". I have to take a look next time I'm sent up there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
    • You sir, big win tonight. Precision never supplied compressor maps in the past and Idk when they started, but it seems they only offer for a few of the older gen2's which is exactly what I have. I punched in some numbers and seem to have gone with the wrong turbo. 600-700whp isn't in the most efficient area and is close to the choke line. 800whp is well off the map. Punching the numbers into a 68mm gen2 turbo map is bang on in the center. Here I was thinking going smaller would shift the power band down, but in reality it would just make it so much worst due to my rev limit. I would have never thought. 
    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
×
×
  • Create New...