Jump to content
SAU Community

  

311 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi people,

Go read SPEED magz issue 12...

there is a contest between 4 cars, GTT vs Supra vs RX7 vs S15....

SUPRA came LASTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT....

Sorry to see it.. lol

It might be fast in straight line but GTT will out run it on corners anydays...

BTW... for those who wants to know the resaults.. RX7 came first..

GTT is a good everyday car.. (i know i have one, use it everyday)

S15 ... is king of drift..

Supra... not much to say abt it... lol

r34 GT-T definetely... lighter, better looking, same amount of power standard :rofl: only downside is that it has a less amount of torque due to the supra having an extra 500cc n havin twin turboz instead of single

yep just took delivery of my GTT and have clocked close to 2000k's in 3 days! I can't stop driving it, its a brilliant machine with a great all round package, even in the tip-tronic. My old R33 doesn't hold a candle to the 34's stiffer ride, running gear, traction control etc. etc. etc. Not the quickest car in a straight line but in the corners it makes me smile ear to ear. Can't vouch for the RZ's performance although I dont think I'd swap this thing for anything but an R34 GTR :rofl:

Where can I find out more about issue 12 of SPEED magazine?? can anyone turn it into PDF? is it the latest issue?

Hi people,

Go read SPEED magz issue 12...

there is a contest between 4 cars, GTT vs Supra vs RX7 vs S15....

SUPRA came LASTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT....  

Sorry to see it.. lol

It might be fast in straight line but GTT will out run it on corners anydays...

BTW... for those who wants to know the resaults..  RX7 came first..  

GTT is a good everyday car.. (i know i have one, use it everyday)

S15 ... is king of drift..

Supra... not much to say abt it... lol

Supra any day. A GTT isn't even in the same league imo.

Read some PRO's advice (SPEED) be4 u start to give stupid comments...

and what different league btw??

JDM vs JDM

FR vs FR

Tubro vs Turbo

both 14** kg vs 14** kg...

both 206kw stock????

WHAT different league???????????????? :headspin:

Read some PRO's advice (SPEED) be4 u start to give stupid comments...

and what different league btw??  

JDM vs JDM

FR vs FR

Tubro vs Turbo

both 14** kg vs 14** kg...

both 206kw stock????

WHAT different league???????????????? :headspin:

im quite sure RZ's have 225kw stock

Read some PRO's advice (SPEED) be4 u start to give stupid comments...

and what different league btw??  

JDM vs JDM

FR vs FR

Tubro vs Turbo

both 14** kg vs 14** kg...

both 206kw stock????

WHAT different league???????????????? :headspin:

Stupid comments? Let me clarify my post then.

By different league i meant that the Supra is a GTR competitor. Sure they're both JDM and FR platforms, but I wasn't saying that they are totally different cars.

The 343Nm of the GTT is quite a bit lower than the 451Nm of the Supra. That's almost 1/3 more torque. That's like comparing an RB20DET powered GTS-t and an RB26DETT powered R32 GTR.

BTW you really can't compare the power ratings as the Supra would have quite a bit more than 206kW.

EDIT: Changed the cars I was comparing

BTW I have read that Speed article, but it really is just an opinion piece. I can't see how they're "PRO's". Sure they've probably driven a lot of cars and are more qualified to judge the cars than me, but aren't they just fellow enthusiasts driving cars and then writing about them?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...