Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Unless you have a CAI or a heatshield of some sort, installing ANY pod filter will more than likely decrease your power (due to the hot air generated by engine being sucked up by the pod).

So with that in mind, changing to a brand name pod will do nearly nothing to increase performance.

You can make your own with just some sheet metal. Just make sure you find a good way to secure it.

If you have a R33 there's a groupbuy for this heatshield+pod setup:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=47767

Or this airbox for R33/34:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=57642

thats what i was wondering, doesnt it get messy??

also dont use an oiled pod such as k and n to reduce risk of covering the AFM with oil. probably best to use a dry one such as an apexi.

if u have a dry one on there that looks like it filters ok just leave it or partition it.

hey..

If you in melbourne I believe its illegal to use the pod oiled type (k&n etc etc) unless its in a box..

Apparantly the Apexi ones (there non oil) are fine though.. because of the no-oil factor...

Get a k&n panel filter and stick that in the stock airbox.. thats the best way to go..... unless you do the CAI in the front bumper, if not you'll just be hearing the stupid sucking noise everytime you drive and wondering if its actualy doing anything good for your car :rofl:

cyas

Although my pod is in the guard, its not so low that there is a risk of sucking up water from puddles etc. Besides the fact that i dont really drive my car in the rain (its a second car) im not gonna drive thru cause ways etc; although one of my friends did this during a flood and hydrauliced his engine; blew a hole in his block. Also, i like the fact that its hidden ans with some cops its 'out of sight, out of mind'. Im using a MAP sensor too, so i dont have to worry about AFM's. Also, keep in mind that a tiny amount of water splashing in from rain wouldnt really hurt anything, as some people set up water injection into the engine to keep combustion temperatures low. Thats just my opinion; correct me if im wrong.

Shaun.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...