Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Spewin I had to work. Would love to have seen Mick run...And myself to...

Um, just checked the track times for the Sprint Track... ARe those times correct for all the categories?

Cause I've ran a fastest of 1:07.02 "DRY" street trim with SC fitted & 1:19.48 "WET" street trim and NA.

All in my humble R31 GTS1.... Surley I can't be mixing it with the turbo cars with boost and mods etc etc....I realise the "hand clicking" timing to..

Heres a easier one to read for the wet weather ones

(Wet) TRACK: Qld Raceway Sprint

GTR Class:

1:08.30, R33, jlNewton

GTS Class:

1:14.29, R33, SirSkyline

1:15.41, R32, nf.

1:16.10, R32, predator

1:16.68, R33, Toy33

1:20.30, R33, JCMarshall_Law

1:21.99, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

***********

TRACK: Qld Raceway Clubman

GTR Class:

1:14.60, R33, jlNewton

GTS Class:

1:17.46, R33, SirSkyline

1:18.58, R32, nf.

1:20.55, R33, Toy33

1:20.66, R31, predator

1:23.13, R33, JCMarshall_Law

1:23.76, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

************

TRACK: Qld Raceway National Circuit

GTR Class:

************

GTS Class:

************

EVO Class:

************

Edited by SirSkyline
Spewin I had to work. Would love to have seen Mick run...And myself to...

Um, just checked the track times for the Sprint Track... ARe those times correct for all the categories?

Cause I've ran a fastest of 1:07.02 "DRY" street trim with SC fitted  & 1:19.48 "WET" street trim and NA.

All in my humble R31 GTS1.... Surley I can't be mixing it with the turbo cars with boost and mods etc etc....I realise the "hand clicking" timing to..

Thats about right. I ran consistant low 1:04s in my old GTST on the sprint layout with just a cat-back exhaust, pod filter, stock boost and Yokohama A539s 235/45 R17, in the dry of course.... Might bring the 33 sedan out for the next one too, see what it can do, That will keep me busy for the day :(

svd001: I think JCMarshall_Law meant real as in the guy hand clicking didn't make a mistake.

SirSkyline: Yea ok, you were after the result order rather than just the times. The reason I didn't do that is that "Wet" track can mean so many different things, like "constant rain" or "rained earlier but the line is drying" or "its raining so hard I cannot see".

Did all you guys collect your end of day time sheet before leaving ?

On the front page I've got Old Toy33 (GTS) and New Toy33 (GTR)

nf, if you mean the end of day sheet with all your laps, a graph of your performance and everyone else in rank order etc (the one jlnewton is referring too) , I printed them but not everyone collected them. If you want I'll post it out. Just PM me a mailing address.

Paul

  • 2 weeks later...

AzzurrA, sorry not trying to appear to have 'l337' group, its just our times are done electronically to 1/100th sec. Whereas the normal times at Sprints are timed by hand (see posts above for full details). So the times kept in this thread are accurate results.

Paul

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...