Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a r32 gtr, and it keeps ripping the std exhaust side engine mount, i am converting to a rb30 so it will be higher 38mm???, my turbo is already hitting the bonnet (custom manifold) t8834d how can i lower engine (it has a 10mm spacer already) with mounts, and create a stronger mounting setup in the process

any one made ther own mounts? or lowered there engine? from the 4 bolts on block? or via the mount itself

urethane?

other plastics?

alloy? (what are the side effects of a true solid mount)

and how much and a rb30 (4wd with 10mm adaptor) be lowered on a gtr 32 sub fram without contact, i may be able to angle engine on exh side to stop turbo hitting but relise there will be some bonnet mods required,

see pic, this gives you a idea how high already (with rb26 engine)

You're screwed. If you try to lower the engine 30 mm and then add a 10 mm adaptor for the 4wd, this means the sump is 40 mm lower, the gearbox is 40 mm lower, the front drive shafts are 40 mm lower etc etc.

About 5 years ago I built an RB30DET (RB30E/25DE) in an R32GTR and it cleared the standard bonnet easily. By enough to have a rather thick strut brace as well. So there is no basic problem wiht fitting an RB30 into an R32. I believe your ONLY answer is to lower the turbo. It is far less complex and less prone to introducing other problems.

As for engine mounts, I suggest an engine brace would be a good idea if you keep ripping LHS mounts. This is not unusual as RB's turn clockwise, consequnetly there are a number of brands of engine braces with shock aborders available . Nismo make rubber hardeness up engne mounts and Noltec have polyurethane mounts.

I have a couple of cars with solid mount engines (Super Tourers) and they vibrate horrendously, stuff is always falling off and cracking. Not something I would recommend.

Hope that helps:cheers:

Noltec have polyurethane mounts.   do they have a web site? yea i think ill just modify my bonnet, manifold looks to well done to hack up, racepro in nz make a bonnet with a vent right above where it hits,

www.noltec.com.au

I have had a closer look at your photo, the turbo doesn't look particularly high. Does it only hit on the bonnet when the engine is flexing? Or is it on it when at rest?:rofl:

You're screwed. If you try to lower the engine 30 mm and then add a 10 mm adaptor for the 4wd, this means the sump is 40 mm lower, the gearbox is 40 mm lower, the front drive shafts are 40 mm lower etc etc.

the gearbox and axel angle shouldnt mater that much, i am more worried about hitting the sub frame, what if i angle the engine more so exh side is lower and intake stays the same? that way only the front driv shafts should be affected, the gearbox will just twist on its mounts, this may give me a little height decrease

www.noltec.com.au

I have had a closer look at your photo, the turbo doesn't look particularly high.  Does it only hit on the bonnet when the engine is flexing? Or is it on it when at rest?:rofl:

idd say only when flexing, but monuts were ok when i removed the 26 engine on saturday, it has a small mark on top of turbo and a small mark on bonnet where they had been rubbing, nothin major, would a bonnet look gay with a hump where the turbo sits? it may look good with a hump and a reverse bonnet scoop tho?

i should of taken a picture side on before i reomved engine, here is a pic with brace insatlled

if you see the manifold picture is it to complex to re weld, if it was just the pictured filter that hit i wouldnt worrie, but since its the comp housing itself i sorta have to, i couls also rase the bonnet at the back for heat flow, this will help a litte , but not 38mm, 38mm is deck height increase with 26 to 30?

i should of taken a picture side on before i reomved engine, here is a pic with brace insatlled

if you see the manifold picture is it to complex to re weld, if it was just the pictured filter that hit i wouldnt worrie, but since its the comp housing itself  i sorta have to, i couls also rase the bonnet at the back for heat flow, this will help a litte , but not 38mm, 38mm is deck height increase with 26 to 30?

Ah, it's not the height of the turbo that is the only problem, it is mounted further forward than usual as well. This is where the bonnet droops down towards the front. Personally I would change the angle of the turbo mount flange on the exhaust manifold. Angle the turbo downwards at the front and rotate it 15 degrees clockwise. Not a particualry difficult job for a competant welder.

RB30 is 85 mm stroke and RB26 is 73.7mm stroke, so that's 11.3 mm longer stroke which = 5.65mm taller block to accommodate the extra stroke. In addition the RB30 conrods are ~30mm longer. Hence the usually accepted number is ~35mm taller.

:cheers:

Ah, it's not the height of the turbo that is the only problem, it is mounted further forward than usual as well.  This is where the bonnet droops down towards the front.  Personally I would change the angle of the turbo mount flange on the exhaust manifold.  Angle the turbo downwards at the front and rotate it 15 degrees clockwise.  Not a particualry difficult job for a competant welder.

although that will mean a new / refitted dump as well then

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
    • Pull codes via the self-diagnosis procedure. As far as I can tell this is just a sign of transmission issues but not a code unto itself.
×
×
  • Create New...